Minced Cartilage Is a One-Step Cartilage Repair Procedure for Small Defects in the Knee-A Systematic-Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Approximately 60% of patients undergoing arthroscopy of the knee present with chondral defects. If left untreated, osteochondral lesions can trigger an early onset of osteoarthritis. Many cartilage repair techniques are mainly differentiated in techniques aiming for bone marrow stimulation, or cell-based methods. Cartilage repair can also be categorized in one- and two-stage procedures. Some two-stage procedures come with a high cost for scaffolds, extensive cell-processing, strict regulatory requirements, and limited logistical availability. Minced cartilage, however, is a one-stage procedure delivering promising results in short term follow-up, as noted in recent investigations. However, there is no available literature summarizing or synthesizing clinical data. The purpose of this study was to analyze and synthesize data from the latest literature in a meta-analysis of outcomes after the minced cartilage procedure and to compare its effectiveness to standard repair techniques. Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching the Cochrane, PubMed, and Ovid databases. Inclusion criteria were the modified Coleman methodology Score (mCMS) >60, cartilaginous knee-joint defects, and adult patients. Patient age < 18 years, biomechanical and animal studies were excluded. Relevant articles were reviewed independently by referring to title and abstract. In a systematic review, we compared three studies and 52 patients with a total of 63 lesions. Results: Analysis of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sub scores at 12 and 24 months showed a significant score increase in every sub score. Highest mean difference was seen in KOOS sport, lowest in KOOS symptoms (12 month: KOOS sport (Mean difference: 35.35 [28.16, 42.53]; p < 0.0001), lowest in KOOS symptoms (Mean difference: 20.12 [15.43, 24.80]; p < 0.0001)). A comparison of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC ) scores visualized a significant score increase for both time points too ((12 month: pooled total mean: 73.00 ± 14.65; Mean difference: 34.33 [26.84, 41.82]; p < 0.00001) (24 month: pooled total mean: 77.64 ± 14.46; mean difference: 35.20 [39.49, 40.92]; p < 0.00001)). Conclusion: Due to no need for separate cell-processing, and thanks to being a one-step procedure, minced cartilage is a promising method for cartilage repair in small defect sizes (mean 2.77 cm2, range 1.3−4.7 cm2). However, the most recent evidence is scarce, and takes only results two years post-surgery into account. Summarized, minced cartilage presents nearly equal short-term improvement of clinical scores (IKDC, KOOS) compared to standard cartilage repair techniques.

Lag screw osteosynthesis of simple olecranon fractures: A biomechanical comparative study.

Olecranon fractures are most frequently stabilized by tension band wiring (TBW), which unfortunately leads to relevant implant removal rates due to K-wire migration and soft tissue irritation. As lag screw osteosynthesis (LSO) might be a gentle and effective alternative in simple fracture patterns, the goal of the present study was to biomechanically compare LSO with TBW in simple olecranon fractures at a cadaver model. A simple olecranon fracture (Mayo type IIA) was created in eight pairs of human cadaver elbows, which were pairwise fixed by either TBW or two transcortical 4.0 mm lag screws. Biomechanical testing was conducted as a pulling force, applied to the triceps tendon in a 90° position. First, cyclic loading between 10 and 300 N was performed for 50,000 cycles. Afterward, maximum load was raised by 0.02 N/cycle until construct failure, what was defined as displacement >2 mm. Besides fracture displacement, failure cycle and failure load, the modes of failure were analyzed. Within the first five cycles, there was no significant difference in displacement (median TBW: 0.2 mm; LSO: 0.5 mm; p = 0.091). Both after 2000 (median TBW: 0.2 mm; LSO: 0.6 mm; p = 0.042) and after 20,000 cycles (median TBW: 0.4 mm; LSO: 0.9 mm; p = 0.027), the difference was significant. Failure cycle (median TBW: 72,639 cycles; LSO: 43,429 cycles; p = 0.017) and failure load (median TBW: 702 N; LSO: 303 N; p = 0.025) differed significantly as well. TBW mostly (6/8) failed at the lock of the cerclage wire, whereas most LSO constructs (5/8) failed as a pullout of the proximal fragment. In conclusion, to our biomechanical findings at human cadaver specimens, simple olecranon fractures treated by LSO show higher dislocation rates and lower failure loads compared to conventional TBW and mostly fail by pullout of the proximal fragment.

Autologous Minced Cartilage Implantation for Arthroscopic One-Stage Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow.

This Technical Note describes the full arthroscopic one-stage treatment of high-grade osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum of the elbow joint by means of minced cartilage implantation.

Low-profile double plating of unstable osteoporotic olecranon fractures: a biomechanical comparative study.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of unstable olecranon fractures, anatomically preshaped locking plates exhibit superior biomechanical results compared with tension band wiring. However, posterior plating (PP) still is accompanied by high rates of plate removal because of soft-tissue irritation and discomfort. Meanwhile, low-profile plates precontoured for collateral double plating (DP) are available and enable muscular soft-tissue coverage combined with angular-stable fixation. The goal of this study was to biomechanically compare PP with collateral DP for osteosynthesis of unstable osteoporotic fractures. METHODS: A comminuted displaced Mayo type IIB fracture was created in 8 osteoporotic pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows. Pair-wise angular stable fixation was performed by either collateral DP or PP. Biomechanical testing was conducted as a pulling force to the triceps tendon in 90° of elbow flexion. Cyclical load changes between 10 and 300 N were applied at 4 Hz for 50,000 cycles. Afterward, the maximum load was raised by 0.02 N/cycle until construct failure, which was defined as displacement > 2 mm. Besides failure cycles and failure loads, modes of failure were analyzed. RESULTS: Following DP, a median endurance of 65,370 cycles (range, 2-83,121 cycles) was recorded, which showed no significant difference compared with PP, with 69,311 cycles (range, 150-81,938 cycles) (P = .263). Failure load showed comparable results as well, with 601 N (range, 300-949 N) after DP and 663 N (range, 300-933 N) after PP (P = .237). All PP constructs and 3 of 8 DP constructs failed by proximal fragment cutout, whereas 5 of 8 DP constructs failed by bony triceps avulsion. CONCLUSION: Angular-stable DP showed comparable biomechanical stability to PP in unstable osteoporotic olecranon fractures under high-cycle loading conditions. Failure due to bony triceps avulsion following DP requires further clinical and biomechanical investigation, for example, on suture augmentation or different screw configurations.

Biodegradable magnesium vs. polylactide pins for radial head fracture stabilization: a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Biodegradable implants have gained increasing importance for the fixation of simple displaced radial head fractures to supersede implant removal and to minimize cartilage destruction. Commonly used polylactide pins still lead to higher rates of secondary loss of reduction compared with metal implants. Alternatively, implants made from a magnesium alloy meanwhile are available in a pin design that hypothetically could perform better than polylactide pins. Because biomechanical data of clinical applications are lacking, the goal of the present study was to biomechanically compare magnesium pins to polylactide pins using a Mason type II radial head fracture model. METHODS: Fourteen pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaver radii with a standardized Mason type II radial head fracture were stabilized either by two 2.0-mm polylactide pins (PPs) or two 2.0-mm magnesium pins (MPs). Biomechanical in vitro testing was conducted as 10 cycles of static loading at 0.1 Hz axially and transversally between 10 and 50 N. Afterward, loosening was tested by dynamic load changes at 4 Hz up to 100,000 cycles. Early fracture displacement was measured after 10,000 cycles. Afterward, maximum loads were raised every 10,000 cycles by 15 N until construct failure, which was defined as fracture displacement ≥2 mm. RESULTS: MP osteosynthesis showed a tendency toward higher primary stability on both axial (MP: 0.19 kN/mm, PP: 0.11 kN/mm; P = .068) and transversal loading (MP: 0.11 kN/mm, PP: 0.10 kN/mm; P = .068). Early fracture displacement was significantly higher following PP osteosynthesis (MP: 0.3 mm, PP: 0.7 mm; P = .030). The superiority of MP was also significant during cyclic loading, represented in a higher failure cycle (MP: 30,684, PP: 5113; P = .009) and in higher failure loads (MP: 95 N, PP: 50 N; P = .024). CONCLUSION: According to our findings, in simple radial head fractures, osteosynthesis with magnesium pins show superior biomechanical properties compared with fractures treated by polylactide pins. Prospective investigations should follow to evaluate clinical outcomes and resorption behavior.

Biomechanical comparison of biodegradable magnesium screws and titanium screws for operative stabilization of displaced capitellar fractures.

BACKGROUND: Displaced fractures of the humeral capitellum are commonly treated operatively and fixed by titanium screws (TSs) either directly or indirectly. In the case of direct transcartilaginous fixation, biodegradable screws with the ability to be countersunk can be favorable regarding implant impingement and cartilage destruction. Hence, the goal of this study was to biomechanically compare headless compression screws made from titanium with a biodegradable equivalent made from a magnesium alloy. METHODS: This biomechanical in vitro study was conducted on 13 pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric humeri, in which a standardized Bryan-Morrey type I fracture was fixed using 2 magnesium screws (MSs) or 2 TSs. First, construct stiffness was measured during 10 cycles of static loading between 10 and 50 N. Second, continuous loading was applied at 4 Hz between 10 and 50 N, increasing the maximum load every 10,000 cycles by 25 N until construct failure occurred. This was defined by fragment displacement >3 mm. RESULTS: Comparison of the 2 screw types showed no differences related to construct stiffness (0.50 ± 0.25 kN/mm in MS group and 0.47 ± 0.13 kN/mm in TS group, P = .701), failure cycle (43,944 ± 21,625 and 41,202 ± 16,457, respectively; P = .701), and load to failure (152 ± 53 N and 150 ± 42 N, respectively; P = .915). CONCLUSION: Biomechanical comparison showed that simple capitellar fractures are equally stabilized by headless compression screws made from titanium or a biodegradable magnesium alloy. Therefore, in view of the advantages of biodegradable implants for transcartilaginous fracture stabilization, their clinical application should be considered and evaluated.

Biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm anterior locking plate to cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring in comminuted patellar fractures.

PURPOSE: To date, surgically treated multifragmentary patellar fractures are still associated with high rates of complications, such as i.e. secondary fracture displacement. Osteosynthesis is most frequently performed with screws and cerclages. To increase primary stability, locking plates have been introduced. However, there is still a lack of biomechanical data supporting the superiority of plate fixation compared to screw fixation with cerclages in these cases. The goal of the present study was to conduct biomechanical comparison of these two techniques under dynamic loading conditions. METHODS: A standardized 34-C3 fracture was created in eight pairs of human cadaveric knee joints. Following a randomization protocol, they were fixed with a 3.5 mm anterior locking plate (LP) or cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring (hybrid osteosynthesis, HO).Subsequently, all constructs were tested for 100 cycles from 90° of knee-flexion to full extension by applying a pulling force to the quadriceps tendon. Outcome parameters were fracture displacement after one cycle, after 100 cycles and implant loosening. Failure was defined as fracture displacement > 2 mm. RESULTS: Biomechanical testing showed significantly less fracture displacement following LP compared to HO both after the first (p = 0.042) and after 100 cycles (p = 0.025). The difference in loosening was significant as well (p = 0.017). Following HO, 5/8 constructs failed during cyclic loading. There was no failure in the LP group. In the HO group, loosening correlated with bone mineral density (R = - 0.857) which was not observed in the LP group (R = - 0.429). CONCLUSION: Anterior locking plate osteosynthesis of comminuted patellar fractures biomechanically provides better primary stability compared to cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring.

Biomechanical dynamic comparison of biodegradable pins and titanium screws for operative stabilization of displaced radial head fractures.

For radial head osteosynthesis, biodegradable implants are gaining in importance to minimize cartilage destruction and implant impingement and to supersede implant removal. Since loss of reduction and pseudarthrosis remain challenging complications, new implants should at least provide comparable biomechanical properties as commonly used metal implants. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment by polylactide pins to titanium screws and to quantify the produced cartilage defects. Eight pairs of human cadaver radii with a standardized Mason type II fracture were stabilized either by two 2.0-mm polylactide pins or titanium screws. The produced cartilage defects were quantified using an image analyzing software. Quasi-static loading was performed axially and transversally for 10 cycles each between 10 and 50 N. Afterward, implant loosening was tested by axial loading up to 10,000 cycles, followed by load to failure testing. Polylactide pins showed less construct stiffness under axial (p = 0.017) and transversal (p = 0.012) loading, and one polylactide pins construct failed after two cycles of transversal loading. At axial loading, a high correlation between bone mineral density and construct stiffness was observed among polylactide pins (R = 0.667; p = 0.071), which was not seen among titanium screws (R = 0.262; p = 0.531). No difference in implant loosening was recorded after 10,000 cycles (p = 0.237); however, one polylactide pins construct failed after 30 cycles and failure loads were higher for titanium screws (p=0.017). Polylactide pin produced smaller cartilage defects (p=0.012). In conclusion, simple radial head fractures treated by polylactide pins show less biomechanical stability than treated by titanium screws, particularly in osteoporotic bone which might lead to secondary loss of reduction. Due to smaller cartilage defects and equal properties under continuous loading, polylactide pins might represent a gentle alternative in patients with good bone quality making subsequent implant removal redundant.

Age- and severity-adjusted treatment of proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents-A systematical review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the proximal humerus in patients under the age of 18 years show a low incidence; existing clinical studies only comprise small patient numbers. Different treatment methods are mentioned in the literature but a comparison of the outcome of these methods is rarely made. Up to now, no evidence-based algorithm for conservative and operative treatment is available. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was therefore to gather the best evidence of different treatment methods and their associated functional outcome, complication rates, rates of limb length discrepancies and radiological outcome. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The OVID database was systematically searched on September 30th in 2016 in order to find all published clinical studies on the subject of proximal humerus fractures of patients ≤18 years. Exclusion criteria were previously defined. The Coleman Methodology Score was used to evaluate the quality of the single studies. 886 studies have been identified by the search strategy. 19 studies with a total of 643 children (mean age: 11.8 years) were included into the meta-analysis with a mean Coleman Methodology Score of 71 ± 7.4 points. 18 of the 19 studies eligible for inclusion were retrospective ones, of the best quality available (mean follow-up ≥ 1 year, mean follow-up rate ≥ 65%). 56% of the patients were male. Proximal humerus fractures were treated conservatively in 41% and surgically in 59% of the cases (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN): 31%; K-wires: 20%; 8% other methods, e.g. plate osteosynthesis, olecranon traction). The overall success rate (good/excellent outcome) for all treatment methods was 93%. The success rate of ESIN (98%) and of K- wire fixation (95%) was significantly higher (p = 0.01) than the success rate of conservative treatment options (91%). A subgroup analysis of severely displaced fractures (Neer grade III/IV, angulation ≥ 20°) resulted in a change of success rates, to the disadvantage of conservative treatment methods (conservative treatment 82%, ESIN 98%, K-wires 95%; p < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ to a significant extent. 9% of the complications occurred in the patients treated by K-wire fixation, 8% if a conservative treatment option was chosen and 7% in the fractures that were stabilized by ESIN. A change from a one-nail technique to a two-nail technique reduced the complication rate of ESIN significantly. Follow-up X- rays without residual deformity could be found in 96% of the patients treated by ESIN, a rate which was higher than in the patients treated conservatively (93%) or by K-wire fixation (88%). The rate of arm length discrepancies at final follow- up was lower if the fractures were stabilized by ESIN (4%) than if they were treated conservatively (9%) or by K-wires (19%). An evaluation of age-dependent treatment options was performed. CONCLUSIONS: By performing this meta-analysis an evidence-based treatment algorithm could be introduced to treat the fractures according to the severity of displacement and according to the patient's age. For severely displaced fractures ESIN is the method of choice, with the best clinical and radiological outcome.

Biomechanical comparison of different external fixator configurations for stabilization of supracondylar humerus fractures in children.

BACKGROUND: Currently, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning are considered the treatment of choice for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. However, indications exist for the use of external fixation with Schanz screws. In this in vitro study, we evaluate the biomechanical properties of a new variation for external fixation and compare them to an established construct. METHODS: Twenty distal cadaver humeri (10 pairs) were allocated to 2 groups. The humeri of the first group were fixed by an external fixator consisting of Schanz screws and an oblique K-wire inserted from the distal radial cortex of the humerus, those of the second group were fixed by a new variation with the oblique K-wire inserted from the distal ulnar cortex of the humerus. Displacement and stiffness in static loading in internal and external rotation, as well as in extension and flexion were evaluated and compared. FINDINGS: The variation of the external fixator of the second group proved to be statistically significantly superior to the variation of the first group in internal rotation loading (p>0.05). In sagittal loading conditions and external rotation loading, the variations were equally stable (p>0.05). There was no significant effect of the samples' bone density on displacement and stiffness values in any direction of loading. INTERPRETATION: In cases of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures when an external fixator is used for osteosynthesis, the insertion of an additional ulnarly inserted anti-rotation K-wire should be preferred to a radially inserted one as it reduces secondary displacement of the distal fragment.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new technique for external fixation of unstable supracondylar humerus fractures in children.

BACKGROUND: Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is regarded as the treatment of choice for unstable supracondylar humerus fractures, but there are cases in which the use of external fixation is preferable. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the method of external fixation could be considered as a stable alternative to percutaneous pinning and whether there was a difference in stability between two different external fixator constructs. METHODS: Eighteen synthetic humeri were allocated to three groups of six bones each. The specimens of group 1 were fixed by crossed pinning, those of group 2 by a new variation of an external fixator and the specimens of group 3 by an established variation of it. Osteotomy displacement was measured under static loading in internal and external rotation, as well as in extension and flexion. RESULTS: The external fixators proved to be significantly more stable than crossed pinning in sagittal loading. In internal rotation loading the new variation of the external fixator showed the best results. CONCLUSIONS: In case of fractures that can't be replaced by closed reduction the new variation of external fixator should be preferred to the established variation or open reduction and crossed pinning.

Biomechanical testing of an innovative fixation procedure to stabilize olecranon osteotomy.

UNLABELLED: For the treatment of distal humerus an approach involving olecranon osteotomy is frequently preferred as it offers a clearer view, especially in cases of complex intraarticular fractures. It is however associated with the high risk of osteotomy-related complications such as nonunion, delayed healing, implant failure and migration of wires. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stability of different new procedures that stabilize olecranon osteotomy compared with conventional tension band wiring. We hypothesize that the new implants provide equivalent stability as the conventional tension band wiring. To test the hypothesis 27 biomechanically evaluated synthetic ulnae were osteotomized and stabilized with either the application of tension band wiring, the Olecranon Hook LCP (Synthes, Switzerland), or the Olecranon Osteotomy nail (Synthes, Switzerland). Loading was performed providing a tensile load to simulate the tensile force applied by the triceps muscle. Cyclic force-controlled loading was performed at 300 alternating forces between 10N and 500N at a speed of 200N/sec. An ultrasound-based system measured displacement to an accuracy of 0.1 mm. Statistical analysis showed significantly less displacement in the Olecranon Hook LCP and Olecranon Osteotomy nail groups compared with tension banding. Comparison of plate and nail yielded no differences in stability. Biomechanical testing did however show significantly higher stability for newer fixation methods for olecranon osteotomies compared with the frequently applied technique of tension band wiring. Whether the use of these implants will also lower complication rates remains to be evaluated in future clinical studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study, Biomechanical Study.