[Quality assurance in breast reconstruction - Establishment of a prospective national online registry for microsurgical breast reconstructions]. / Qualitätssicherung in der Brustrekonstruktion ­ Etablierung eines prospektiven nationalen Onlineregisters für mikrochirurgische Brustrekonstruktionen.

BACKGROUND: The loss of a breast, and thus of the female body shape, is often extremely traumatising for women affected. Although free flap grafts have become the gold standard in reconstructive breast surgery, it has not been possible to date to unequivocally document their superiority over conventional alternative techniques. To date, there are no data on the care situation in Germany. Neither the number of reconstructions nor the proportion of the individual techniques is known. A prospective online registry has been set up in order to systematically collect and transparently present the structure and quality of care. The long-term goals are to record the existing quality of care, improve deficits and to certify centres with the appropriate expertise to establish a high level of care nationwide. METHODS: For this purpose, the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC) has set up an internet-based database in which treatment data are recorded anonymously. As part of a certification process, auditors checked structure quality, compliance with specifications, and the stringency of the data entered in comparison with the hospital's internal documentation. If the evaluation is positive, the DGPRÄC quality seal is awarded. RESULTS: Since its introduction in 2012, the database has provided validated information. Initially, only a few departments were prepared to present their results transparently. However, the number has grown steadily in recent years. As a result, the quality recording assumed a pioneering function nationwide and can now be used as a reliable source of information by patients and doctors. The DGPRÄC website features a map of the centres, which are colour-coded according to their respective qualifications. It is thus possible to find a qualified plastic surgeon with comprehensive expertise in acceptable proximity to every oncological breast centre. CONCLUSION: The database provides an overview of the quality of the various surgical techniques and thus the possibility of serious self monitoring and scientific analysis. The systematic collection of data has contributed to strengthening the position of plastic surgery in the field of reconstructive breast surgery. However, the financial and personnel resources required to establish the database were clearly underestimated.

[Quo vadis DGPRÄC: associated members' goals for the future]. / Quo vadis DGPRÄC ­ wo wollen die assoziierten Mitglieder hin?

Plastic surgery is extremely diverse and offers various fields of work. To provide optimal support for plastic surgeons in training, it is therefore paramount to know their mid- and long-term goals. To that end, we conducted a web-based survey among the 462 associated members of the German Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC). Besides asking questions about the current status, we specifically inquired about the pursued setting and main area of work. 84 completed questionnaires were evaluated. Most respondents saw their future in a private practice setting. Reconstructive surgery and aesthetic surgery were by far the most sought-after fields, while only a few of the associated members pursued a career in hand surgery, and none of them wished to work in burn care. At the same time, they felt that aesthetic surgery was the field where training was most insufficient. Therefore, measures need to be taken to improve the training in aesthetic surgery. Also, it is paramount to increase the attractiveness of both the fields of hand surgery and burn care to assure highly qualified care in the future.