The effect of transdermal testosterone on mammographic density in postmenopausal women not receiving systemic estrogen therapy.

CONTEXT: Greater mammographic density is associated with increased breast cancer risk and reduced diagnostic mammographic sensitivity and may be seen with estrogen/progestin therapy (EPT). The effects of testosterone therapy on mammographic density in postmenopausal women not on EPT are not known. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare effects of two doses of the testosterone transdermal patch (TTP) with placebo in postmenopausal women without concomitant EPT on mammographic density over 52 wk. DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational trial. PATIENTS: Patients included 279 postmenopausal women participating in a testosterone and sexual function study with paired mammograms for baseline and 52 wk/exit. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to placebo, TTP 150 microg/d, or TTP 300 microg/d, stratified by menopause type (natural or surgical). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change from baseline to wk 52 in the percentage of dense tissue (PD) on digital mammograms. RESULTS: A total of 250 women with paired mammograms for study baseline and wk 52 were included in the primary analysis. Mean age was 54.6 yr, baseline body mass index was 27.5 kg/m(2), and 78% were naturally menopausal. There were no baseline differences between groups. Mean changes from baseline (+/-SEM) in PD for placebo, TTP 150 microg/d and TTP 300 microg/d were small (0.05 +/- 0.16, 0.06 +/- 0.19, and 0.21 +/- 0.17%) and not significantly different. There were no statistically significant differences from placebo for total dense or nondense area and no significant relationships between hormone levels and PD after adjustment for body mass index. CONCLUSION: TTP therapy over 52 wk appears to have no significant effect on digitally quantified absolute or percent dense mammographic area in postmenopausal women not using EPT.

Esophageal transit and in vivo disintegration of branded risedronate sodium tablets and two generic formulations of alendronic acid tablets: a single-center, single-blind, six-period crossover study in healthy female subjects.

BACKGROUND: Delayed esophageal transit or disintegration of oral bisphosphonate tablets before they enter the stomach may be of concern with respect to iatrogenic complications among patients receiving longterm treatment. Different formulations of generic bisphosphonate tablets meeting regulatory requirements may have substantial differences in pharmaceutical attributes from the branded product that may result in different characteristics during esophageal transit. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and compare esophageal transit times and in vivo disintegration of 3 bisphosphonate formulations, one branded and the others generic, that are commercially available in Canada and the United Kingdom. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, singleblind, 6-period crossover study in healthy postmenopausal women aged >50 years. Each subject received a single oral dose of a branded risedronate sodium 35-mg tablet and 2 generic formulations of alendronic acid 70-mg tablets (Novopharm Limited, Toronto, Canada, and Teva UK Limited, Morley, United Kingdom) in both the erect and semisupine (45 degrees ) positions. Although the products are labeled to be taken in the erect position, the semisupine position was included to simulate dosing in bedridden patients. Subjects took tablets with 30 mL of water in the morning after an overnight fast. The tablets were radiolabeled with technetium-99m ion-exchange resins to enable visualization and measurement of esophageal transit time and disintegration using a gamma camera. Dynamic scintigraphic images were obtained for a total of 10 minutes: 2 images per second for the first 30 seconds and 1 image every 15 seconds for 9.5 minutes. This was a mechanistic study and tolerability was not assessed. RESULTS: The study was conducted in 20 healthy white female subjects with a mean age of 62 years (range, 51-77 years). The effect of body position was statistically significant (P = 0.043), with the estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.74 indicating longer transit time in the semisupine position relative to the erect position. There was a statistically significant difference in transit time among the 3 types of tablets (P = 0.007), with the Novopharm tablet (HR = 0.59; P < 0.001) and Teva tablet (HR = 0.71; P = 0.042) having longer transit times compared with the risedronate tablet. In 4 instances, the Novopharm tablet disintegrated and dispersed in the esophagus, once in the erect position and 3 times in the semisupine position. CONCLUSIONS: In these healthy female subjects, esophageal transit was delayed when the tablets were given in the semisupine position. The branded risedronate tablet had a significantly faster transit time than the 2 generic formulations of alendronate tested.