Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Microorganisms ; 11(6)2023 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37375003

RESUMO

It is known that alcoholic beverages alter the human gut microbiome. This study focused on the potential impact of non-ethanolic ingredients in whisky on the gut bacteriome. A pilot study was carried out on 15 whisky drinkers, 5 rice beer drinkers, and 9 non-drinkers to determine the effect of alcoholic beverages on the host microbiome and metabolome. Additionally, a mouse model was used to assess the differential impact of three whisky brands (each with an equal ethanol concentration). The results indicate that the non-ethanolic components have an impact on the gut microbiome, as well as on the metabolites in blood and feces. The amount of Prevotella copri, a typical core Indian gut bacterium, decreased in both the human and mouse groups of whisky type 1, but an increase in abundance of Helicobacteriaceae (p = 0.01) was noticed in both groups. Additionally, the alcohol-treated cohorts had lower levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), specifically butyric acid, and higher amounts of lipids and stress marker IL1-ß than the untreated groups (p = 0.04-0.01). Furthermore, two compounds, ethanal/acetaldehyde (found in all the whisky samples) and arabitol (unique to whisky type 1), were tested in the mice. Similar to the human subjects, the whisky type 1 treated mouse cohort and the arabitol-treated group showed decreased levels of Prevotella copri (p = 0.01) in their gut. The results showed that non-ethanolic compounds have a significant impact on host gut bacterial diversity and metabolite composition, which has a further vital impact on host health. Our work further emphasizes the need to study the impact of non-ethanolic ingredients of alcoholic beverages on host health.

2.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 43: 58-65, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36371334

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Seroepidemiology and genomic surveillance are valuable tools to investigate infection transmission during a pandemic. North East (NE) India is a strategically important region being the gateway connecting the country with Southeast Asia. Here, we examined the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in NE India during the first and second waves of COVID-19 using serological and whole genome sequencing approaches. METHODS: qRT-PCR analysis was performed on a selected population (n â€‹= â€‹16,295) from June 2020 to July 2021, and metadata was collected. Immunoassays were studied (n â€‹= â€‹2026) at three-time points (August 2020, February 2021, and June 2021) and in a cohort (n â€‹= â€‹35) for a year. SARS-CoV-2 whole genomes (n â€‹= â€‹914) were sequenced and analyzed with those obtained from the databases. RESULTS: Test positivity rates (TPR) in the first and second waves were 6.34% and 6.64% in Assam, respectively, and a similar pattern was observed in other NE states. Seropositivity in the three time points was 10.63%, 40.3%, and 46.33%, respectively, and neutralizing antibody prevalence was 90.91%, 52.14%, and 69.30%, respectively. Persistence of pan-IgG-N SARS-CoV-2 antibody for over a year was observed among three subjects in the cohort group. Normal variants dominated the first wave, while B.1.617.2 and AY-sublineages dominated the second wave in the region. The prevalence of the variants co-related well with high TPR and seropositivity rate in the region and identified mostly among vaccinated individuals. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 first wave in the region witnessed low transmission with the evolution of diverse variants. Seropositivity increased during the study period with over half of the individuals carrying neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. High infection and seroprevalence in NE India during the second wave were associated with the dominant emergence of variants of concern.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Genômica , Índia/epidemiologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes
3.
Prateek Singh; Rajat Ujjainiya; Satyartha Prakash; Salwa Naushin; Viren Sardana; Nitin Bhatheja; Ajay Pratap Singh; Joydeb Barman; Kartik Kumar; Raju Khan; Karthik Bharadwaj Tallapaka; Mahesh Anumalla; Amit Lahiri; Susanta Kar; Vivek Bhosale; Mrigank Srivastava; Madhav Nilakanth Mugale; C.P Pandey; Shaziya Khan; Shivani Katiyar; Desh Raj; Sharmeen Ishteyaque; Sonu Khanka; Ankita Rani; Promila; Jyotsna Sharma; Anuradha Seth; Mukul Dutta; Nishant Saurabh; Murugan Veerapandian; Ganesh Venkatachalam; Deepak Bansal; Dinesh Gupta; Prakash M Halami; Muthukumar Serva Peddha; Gopinath M Sundaram; Ravindra P Veeranna; Anirban Pal; Ranvijay Kumar Singh; Suresh Kumar Anandasadagopan; Parimala Karuppanan; Syed Nasar Rahman; Gopika Selvakumar; Subramanian Venkatesan; MalayKumar Karmakar; Harish Kumar Sardana; Animika Kothari; DevendraSingh Parihar; Anupma Thakur; Anas Saifi; Naman Gupta; Yogita Singh; Ritu Reddu; Rizul Gautam; Anuj Mishra; Avinash Mishra; Iranna Gogeri; Geethavani Rayasam; Yogendra Padwad; Vikram Patial; Vipin Hallan; Damanpreet Singh; Narendra Tirpude; Partha Chakrabarti; Sujay Krishna Maity; Dipyaman Ganguly; Ramakrishna Sistla; Narender Kumar Balthu; Kiran Kumar A; Siva Ranjith; Vijay B Kumar; Piyush Singh Jamwal; Anshu Wali; Sajad Ahmed; Rekha Chouhan; Sumit G Gandhi; Nancy Sharma; Garima Rai; Faisal Irshad; Vijay Lakshmi Jamwal; MasroorAhmad Paddar; Sameer Ullah Khan; Fayaz Malik; Debashish Ghosh; Ghanshyam Thakkar; Saroj K Barik; Prabhanshu Tripathi; Yatendra Kumar Satija; Sneha Mohanty; Md. Tauseef Khan; Umakanta Subudhi; Pradip Sen; Rashmi Kumar; Anshu Bhardwaj; Pawan Gupta; Deepak Sharma; Amit Tuli; Saumya Ray Chaudhuri; Srinivasan Krishnamurthi; Prakash L; Ch V Rao; B N Singh; Arvindkumar Chaurasiya; Meera Chaurasiyar; Mayuri Bhadange; Bhagyashree Likhitkar; Sharada Mohite; Yogita Patil; Mahesh Kulkarni; Rakesh Joshi; Vaibhav Pandya; Amita Patil; Rachel Samson; Tejas Vare; Mahesh Dharne; Ashok Giri; Shilpa Paranjape; G. Narahari Sastry; Jatin Kalita; Tridip Phukan; Prasenjit Manna; Wahengbam Romi; Pankaj Bharali; Dibyajyoti Ozah; Ravi Kumar Sahu; Prachurjya Dutta; Moirangthem Goutam Singh; Gayatri Gogoi; Yasmin Begam Tapadar; Elapavalooru VSSK Babu; Rajeev K Sukumaran; Aishwarya R Nair; Anoop Puthiyamadam; PrajeeshKooloth Valappil; Adrash Velayudhan Pillai Prasannakumari; Kalpana Chodankar; Samir Damare; Ved Varun Agrawal; Kumardeep Chaudhary; Anurag Agrawal; Shantanu Sengupta; Debasis Dash.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21267889

RESUMO

Data science has been an invaluable part of the COVID-19 pandemic response with multiple applications, ranging from tracking viral evolution to understanding the effectiveness of interventions. Asymptomatic breakthrough infections have been a major problem during the ongoing surge of Delta variant globally. Serological discrimination of vaccine response from infection has so far been limited to Spike protein vaccines used in the higher-income regions. Here, we show for the first time how statistical and machine learning (ML) approaches can discriminate SARS-CoV-2 infection from immune response to an inactivated whole virion vaccine (BBV152, Covaxin, India), thereby permitting real-world vaccine effectiveness assessments from cohort-based serosurveys in Asia and Africa where such vaccines are commonly used. Briefly, we accessed serial data on Anti-S and Anti-NC antibody concentration values, along with age, sex, number of doses, and number of days since the last vaccine dose for 1823 Covaxin recipients. An ensemble ML model, incorporating a consensus clustering approach alongside the support vector machine (SVM) model, was built on 1063 samples where reliable qualifying data existed, and then applied to the entire dataset. Of 1448 self-reported negative subjects, 724 were classified as infected. Since the vaccine contains wild-type virus and the antibodies induced will neutralize wild type much better than Delta variant, we determined the relative ability of a random subset of such samples to neutralize Delta versus wild type strain. In 100 of 156 samples, where ML prediction differed from self-reported uninfected status, Delta variant, was neutralized more effectively than the wild type, which cannot happen without infection. The fraction rose to 71.8% (28 of 39) in subjects predicted to be infected during the surge, which is concordant with the percentage of sequences classified as Delta (75.6%-80.2%) over the same period.

4.
Salwa Naushin; Viren Sardana; Rajat Ujjainiya; Nitin Bhatheja; Rintu Kutum; Akash Kumar Bhaskar; Shalini Pradhan; Satyartha Prakash; Raju Khan; Birendra Singh Rawat; Giriraj Ratan Chandak; Karthik Bharadwaj Tallapaka; Mahesh Anumalla; Amit Lahiri; Susanta Kar; Shrikant Ramesh Mulay; Madhav Nilakanth Mugale; Mrigank Srivastava; Shaziya Khan; Anjali Srivastava; Bhawna Tomar; Murugan Veerapandian; Ganesh Venkatachalam; Selvamani Raja Vijayakumar; Ajay Agarwal; Dinesh Gupta; Prakash M Halami; Muthukumar Serva Peddha; Gopinath M; Ravindra P Veeranna; Anirban Pal; Vinay Kumar Agarwal; Anil Ku Maurya; Ranvijay Kumar Singh; Ashok Kumar Raman; Suresh Kumar Anandasadagopan; Parimala Karupannan; Subramanian Venkatesan; Harish Kumar Sardana; Anamika Kothari; Rishabh Jain; Anupma Thakur; Devendra Singh Parihar; Anas Saifi; Jasleen Kaur; Virendra Kumar; Avinash Mishra; Iranna Gogeri; Geetha Vani Rayasam; Praveen Singh; Rahul Chakraborty; Gaura Chaturvedi; Pinreddy Karunakar; Rohit Yadav; Sunanda Singhmar; Dayanidhi Singh; Sharmistha Sarkar; Purbasha Bhattacharya; Sundaram Acharya; Vandana Singh; Shweta Verma; Drishti Soni; Surabhi Seth; Firdaus Fatima; Shakshi Vashisht; Sarita Thakran; Akash Pratap Singh; Akanksha Sharma; Babita Sharma; Manikandan Subramanian; Yogendra Padwad; Vipin Hallan; Vikram Patial; Damanpreet Singh; Narendra Vijay Tirpude; Partha Chakrabarti; Sujay Krishna Maity; Dipyaman Ganguly; Jit Sarkar; Sistla Ramakrishna; Balthu Narender Kumar; Kiran A Kumar; Sumit G. Gandhi; Piyush Singh Jamwal; Rekha Chouhan; Vijay Lakshmi Jamwal; Nitika Kapoor; Debashish Ghosh; Ghanshyam Thakkar; Umakanta Subudhi; Pradip Sen; Saumya Raychaudhri; Amit Tuli; Pawan Gupta; Rashmi Kumar; Deepak Sharma; Rajesh P. Ringe; Amarnarayan D; Mahesh Kulkarni; Dhanasekaran Shanmugam; Mahesh Dharne; Syed G Dastager; Rakesh Joshi; Amita P. Patil; Sachin N Mahajan; Abu Junaid Khan; Vasudev Wagh; Rakeshkumar Yadav; Ajinkya Khilari; Mayuri Bhadange; Arvindkumar H. Chaurasiya; Shabda E Kulsange; Krishna khairnar; Shilpa Paranjape; Jatin Kalita; G.Narahari Sastry; Tridip Phukan; Prasenjit Manna; Wahengbam Romi; Pankaj Bharali; Dibyajyoti Ozah; Ravi Kumar Sahu; Elapaval VSSK Babu; Rajeev K Sukumaran; Aishwarya R Nair; Anoop Puthiyamadam; Prajeesh Kooloth Valappil; Adarsh Velayudhanpillai; Kalpana Chodankar; Samir Damare; Yennapu Madhavi; Ved Varun Agrawal; Sumit Dahiya; Anurag Agrawal; Debasis Dash; Shantanu Sengupta.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21249713

RESUMO

To understand the spread of SARS-CoV2, in August and September 2020, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (India), conducted a sero-survey across its constituent laboratories and centers across India. Of 10,427 volunteers, 1058 (10.14%) tested positive for SARS CoV2 anti-nucleocapsid (anti-NC) antibodies; 95% with surrogate neutralization activity. Three-fourth recalled no symptoms. Repeat serology tests at 3 (n=346) and 6 (n=35) months confirmed stability of antibody response and neutralization potential. Local sero-positivity was higher in densely populated cities and was inversely correlated with a 30 day change in regional test positivity rates (TPR). Regional seropositivity above 10% was associated with declining TPR. Personal factors associated with higher odds of sero-positivity were high-exposure work (Odds Ratio, 95% CI, p value; 2{middle dot}23, 1{middle dot}92-2{middle dot}59, 6{middle dot}5E-26), use of public transport (1{middle dot}79, 1{middle dot}43-2{middle dot}24, 2{middle dot}8E-06), not smoking (1{middle dot}52, 1{middle dot}16-1{middle dot}99, 0{middle dot}02), non-vegetarian diet (1{middle dot}67, 1{middle dot}41-1{middle dot}99, 3{middle dot}0E-08), and B blood group (1{middle dot}36,1{middle dot}15-1{middle dot}61, 0{middle dot}001). Impact StatementWidespread asymptomatic and undetected SARS-CoV2 infection affected more than a 100 million Indians by September 2020. Declining new cases thereafter may be due to persisting humoral immunity amongst sub-communities with high exposure. FundingCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India (CSIR)

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...