The noncervical lateral transverse foramina.

The lateral vertebral foramen (LVF) is an osseous feature found in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of some artiodactyls and perissodactyls. To learn more about the distribution and characteristics of the LVF, we examined museum specimens from the Smithsonian mammal collection and teaching specimens from the Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine. We identified five anatomically different types of LVF and noted their occurrence in 60 species. The LVF varies from a deep lateral groove at the cranial intervertebral notch, to as many as three distinct foramina located bilaterally in the caudal half of each vertebra. A nomenclature was developed to describe these five distinctly different LVF forms. The interspecific distribution of the LVF varies from examples such as the gazelle Gazella spekei, where the LVF occurs only in the thoracic region, to others such as the Siberian musk deer Moschus berezovski, where the LVF is predominant only in the lumbar region. Others, such as the Bos (cows), have large LVF along most of both the thoracic and lumbar regions of the vertebral column. Some did not have any form of LVF, such as the Giraffidae (giraffes) and Cetacea (whales). No LVF were found in 15 species representing nine families of the outgroup Carnivora, thus the LVF appears to be a characteristic specific to the artiodactyls and perissodactyls.

Intraocular pressure fluctuations of growing chick eyes are suppressed in constant light conditions.

We report measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) in growing domestic chicks at 12 h intervals, with three different lighting conditions. One group of chicks was raised in 12 h light and 12 h darkness (N), another in constant light (CL), and the third group was initially exposed to CL for three weeks then returned to N for either one week or four weeks (CLN). Pressures were measured in the middle of the light and dark periods (noon and midnight) for N and CLN birds, and at corresponding 12 h intervals for CL birds (also noon and midnight). The IOP of N chicks fluctuated from a light period average value of 25 mm Hg ( ±1.3 SD), to a dark period average value of 17.5 mm Hg ( ±1.1 SD mm Hg; P < 0.0001). These pressures were established by 4 days of age. At 7 weeks, (N) IOP continued to fluctuate: light values were 21.7 mm Hg (±1.2 SD), and dark values were 18.3 mm Hg ( ±0.7 SD). The IOP of CL birds did not fluctuate, remaining steady at 17 mm Hg ( ±1.4 SD). Chicks exposed to CL for 3 weeks required more than one week in N to re-establish (N) IOP values. We conclude that IOP fluctuates in hatchling chicks under N light conditions, that fluctuation is suppressed in CL light conditions, and that IOP recovery from 3 weeks suppression in CL requires more than one week in N light conditions.

Plasticity in the growth of the chick eye: emmetropization achieved by alternate morphologies.

Both refractive properties of the eyes and ambient light conditions affect emmetropization during growth. Exposure to constant light flattens the cornea making chicks hyperopic. To discover whether and how growing chick eyes restore emmetropia after exposure to constant light (CL) for 3, 7, or 11weeks, we returned chicks to normal (N) conditions with 12h. of light alternating with 12h. of darkness (designated the "R", or recovery, condition) for total periods of 4, 7, 11, or 17weeks. The two control groups were raised in CL conditions or raised in N conditions for the same length of time. We measured anterior chamber depths and lens thicknesses with an A-scan ultrasound machine. We measured corneal curvatures with an eight-axis keratometer, and refractions with conventional retinoscopy. We estimated differences in optical powers of CL, R and N chicks of identical age by constructing ray-tracing models using the above measurements and age-adjusted normal lens curvatures. We also computed the sensitivity of focus for small perturbations of the above optical parameters. Full refractive recovery from CL effects always occurred. Hyperopic refractive errors were absent when R chicks were returned to N for as little as 1week after 3weeks CL treatment. In R chicks exposed to CL for 11weeks and returned to N, axial lengths, vitreous chamber depths and radii of corneal curvatures did not return to normal, although their refractions did. While R chicks can usually recover emmetropia, after long periods of exposure to CL, they cannot recover normal ocular morphology. Emmetropization following CL exposure is achieved primarily by adjusting the relationship between corneal curvature and axial length, resulting in normal refractions.

The effects of light regimes and hormones on corneal growth in vivo and in organ culture.

When chicks are exposed to constant light (CL) during growth, their corneas become flatter and lighter in weight, and their anterior segments become shallower than those of chicks exposed to cyclical periods of light and dark. These effects have been correlated with CL suppression of cyclical changes in melatonin levels. The question of whether light directly influences corneal growth (e.g. via cryptochromes in the cornea) or acts remotely via the suppression of the melatonin rhythm has not yet been answered. Retinoic acid (RA), an ubiquitous morphogen, also causes non-functional flattening during corneal growth, but its effect in vivo has not been correlated with light regimes. We wished to characterize and distinguish between hormonal and light effects on corneal growth. We used organ culture to study the direct effects of light regimes, melatonin, and RA, and compared these results with those of parallel in vivo experiments. In this study, eye drops containing melatonin or RA were applied to corneas exposed to CL in vivo or in organ culture, and effects on corneal mass and hydration were measured. We applied a melatonin blocker, luzindole, to chick corneas in normal light/dark conditions to confirm that the observed melatonin effects are mediated at the cell membrane. Anterior chamber depth and refraction in vivo were measured. We found that, during CL exposure, combined application of melatonin and RA eye drops increased the depth of the anterior segment in vivo, (P = 0.003) and interestingly, both also reduced the hyperopia of CL exposure after 2 weeks (P = 0.002), thus partially reversing the effects of CL. RA increased corneal hydration in vivo (P = 0.030) but not in organ culture. Melatonin had no effect on corneal hydration in vivo, but in organ culture, melatonin significantly decreased hydration (P < 0.001). We found no evidence for a direct effect of light on corneal hydration in growing chick corneas in culture. Melatonin is required for normal corneal growth in vivo, and together melatonin and RA, or RA alone, affects the regulation of water content within the chick cornea. Melatonin also affects corneal hydration in vitro, but RA does not.

Morphometrics of corneal growth in chicks raised in constant light.

In this study we wish to augment our understanding of the effect of environment on corneal growth and morphology. To understand how corneal development of chicks raised in constant light differs from that of 'normal' eyes exposed to cyclic periods of light and dark, white Leghorn chicks were raised under either constant light (approximately 700 lux at cage top) or in 12 h light/12 h dark conditions for up to 12 weeks after hatching. To determine whether corneal expansion is uniform, some birds from each group received corneal tattoos for periodic photographic assessment. By 16 days of age, constant light corneas weighed less than light/dark regimen corneas [7.39 +/- 0.35 mg (SE) vs. 8.47 mg +/- 0.26 mg SE wet weight, P < or = 0.05], and corresponding differences were seen in corneal dry weights. Spatial expansion of the corneal surface was uniform in both groups, but the rate of expansion was slower in constant light chicks [0.0327 +/- 0.009 (SE) vs. 0.144 +/- 0.018 (SE) mm(2) day(-1) for normal chicks, P < or = 0.001]. At 1 day of age, there were 422 +/- 12.5 (SE) stromal cells 0.01 mm(-2) in the central cornea and 393 +/- 21.5 (SE) stromal cells 0.01 mm(-2 )peripherally. Although this difference is not statistically significant, the cell densities in the central cornea were always larger than those of the peripheral cornea in all eight measurements over a 10.5-week period, and this difference is significant (P < or = 0.008, binomial test). Light/dark regimen birds show no such consistent difference in cell densities between central and peripheral corneas. Thus, the density distribution of corneal stromal cells of chicks grown in constant light differs from that of normal chicks. Taken together, all these observations suggest that diurnal cycles of light and darkness are necessary for normal corneal growth.