Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 37(1): 145-53, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19695889

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Mosaic bioprosthesis is a third-generation stented porcine bioprosthesis combining physiologic fixation and alpha-amino oleic acid (AOA) antimineralisation treatment to improve haemodynamic performance and durability. This single-centre study reports the clinical results, including haemodynamic performance, of the Mosaic bioprosthesis after implant in aortic or mitral position. METHODS: Between February 1994 and October 1999, 255 patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR; mean age: 67 years, range: 23-82 years) and 47 patients with mitral valve replacement (MVR; mean age: 67 years, range: 41-84 years) were enrolled in this prospective non-randomised clinical trial. Follow-up visits were performed 30 days and 6 months after implant and annually thereafter. The cumulative follow-up was 1976.2 patient-years (pt-yrs) after AVR (median: 8.3 years, maximum: 14.0 years) and 336.9 pt-yrs after mitral valve replacement (MVR) (median: 8.2 years, maximum: 13.3 years). RESULTS: After AVR, mean systolic gradient and effective orifice area at 4, 8 and 13 years follow-up were 13.3+/-5.6, 15.5+/-7.7 and 16.0+/-7.2 mmHg and 1.8+/-0.5, 1.8+/-0.5 and 1.7+/-0.4 cm(2). After MVR, respective data were 4.7+/-2.1, 4.3+/-1.2 and 5.0 mmHg (only one recording) and 2.2+/-0.7, 2.3+/-0.6 and 1.8 cm(2). Transvalvular regurgitation at 13-year follow-up was mild or less in both the AVR and MVR patients. Thirteen-year survival was 63.1+/-4.5% in the AVR group and 51.2+/-13.6% in the MVR group. Early mortality after AVR and MVR was 1.2% and 0.0%, respectively; late mortality was 3.2%pt-yr(-1) and 3.3%pt-yr(-1), including a valve-related/unexplained mortality of 1.1%pt-yr(-1) and 0.9%pt-yr(-1). Freedom from adverse events in the AVR and MVR group was permanent neurological event: 97.4+/-1.2% and 96.0+/-3.9%; valvular thrombosis: 97.8+/-1.1% and 100%; structural valve deterioration: 84.8+/-7.8% and 93.8+/-6.1%; explant: 73.3+/-7.3% and 89.3+/-6.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The Mosaic bioprosthesis demonstrates excellent clinical performance and safety after 13 years of follow-up. Continued follow-up will determine whether this new design will provide increased durability.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Bioprótese , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Desenho de Prótese , Falha de Prótese , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 83(4): 1310-8, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17383332

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Mosaic bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) is a third-generation stented porcine bioprosthesis combining physiologic fixation and amino oleic acid antimineralization treatment to improve hemodynamic performance and durability. The findings of this single-center experience with this valve were evaluated to determine the clinical and hemodynamic performance. METHODS: Between February 1994 and October 1999, we enrolled 255 patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a mean age of 67 years (range, 23 to 82 years) and 47 patients with mitral valve replacement (MVR) with a mean age of 67 years (range, 41 to 84 years) in this post-United States Food and Drug Administration approval prospective and nonrandomized clinical trial. Patients were followed-up, including serial echocardiographic assessment, within 30 days, at 6 months, and annually thereafter. The cumulative follow-up was 1540 patient-years for AVR (mean, 6.1 years; maximum, 10 years) and 250 patient-years for MVR (mean, 5.4 years, maximum; 10 years). RESULTS: Early mortality after AVR (<30 days) was 0.8%; late mortality per patient-year was 3.5%, including a valve-related/unexplained mortality of 1.1%. Early mortality after MVR (<30 days) was 0.0%; late mortality per patient-year was 2.8%, including a valve-related/unexplained mortality of 1.2%. Median postoperative gradient and effective orifice area for all valves after AVR were (early, n = 252; 5 years, n = 161; 9 years, n = 43) 13.7, 12.3, and 11.7 mm Hg and 1.9, 1.8, and 1.8 cm2 at early, 5 years, and 9 years, respectively. With MVR respective data were (early, n = 46; 5 years, n = 25; 7 years, n = 13) 4.6, 4.1, and 3.9 mm Hg and 1.8, 2.2, and 2.3 cm2. At 10 years, freedom from adverse events in the AVR group and MVR group was, respectively, thromboembolism, 86.6% +/- 6.6% and 86.3% +/- 9.8%; permanent neurologic event, 91.2% +/- 6.8% and 90.9% +/- 8.7%; valve thrombosis, 98.2% +/- 0.8% and 100%; structural valve deterioration, 87.1% +/- 6.7% and 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Our midterm results demonstrate clinical safety and good performance of the Mosaic bioprosthesis. Continued follow-up will determine if this new design will provide increased durability.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Bioprótese , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/mortalidade , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Ecocardiografia Doppler , Feminino , Seguimentos , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagem , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Probabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Falha de Prótese , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Taxa de Sobrevida , Suínos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...