Evaluating the Base Excision Repair Inhibitor TRC102 and Temozolomide for patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma in the Phase 2 Adult Brain Tumor Consortium Trial BERT.

PURPOSE: Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a dismal prognosis. While DNA alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) is mainstay of chemotherapy, therapeutic resistance develops rapidly in patients. Base excision repair inhibitor TRC102 (methoxyamine) reverses TMZ resistance in preclinical glioma models. We sought to investigate efficacy and safety of oral TRC102+TMZ for recurrent GBM (rGBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pre-registered (NCT02395692), non-randomized, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial (BERT) was planned and conducted through the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC-1402). Arm 1 included bevacizumab-naïve GBM patients at first recurrence, with primary endpoint of response rates. If sufficient activity was identified, a second arm was planned in bevacizumab-refractory patients. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS at six months (PFS-6), and toxicity. RESULTS: Arm 1 enrolled 19 patients with median of two treatment cycles. Objective responses were not observed, hence, arm 2 did not open. Median OS was 11.1 months (95%CI 8.2-17.9). Median PFS was 1.9 months (95%CI 1.8-3.7). PFS-6 was 10.5% (95%CI 1.3-33.1%). Most toxicities were Grade 1-2, with two Grade 3 lymphopenias and one Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Two patients with PFS ≥17 months and OS >32 months were deemed 'extended survivors'. RNA sequencing of tumor tissue, obtained at diagnosis, demonstrated significantly enriched signatures of DNA damage response (DDR), chromosomal instability (CIN70, CIN25), and cellular proliferation (PCNA25) in 'extended survivors'. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm safety and feasibility of TRC102+TMZ for rGBM patients. They also warrant further evaluation of combination therapy in biomarker-enriched trials enrolling GBM patients with baseline hyperactivated DDR pathways.

Discontinuation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Tumors.

Patients with brain tumors will experience seizures during their disease course. While providers can use antiseizure medications to control these events, patients with brain tumors can experience side effects, ranging from mild to severe, from these medications. Providers in subspecialties such as neurology, neuro-oncology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology often work with patients with brain tumor to balance seizure control and the adverse toxicity of antiseizure medications. In this study, we sought to explore the problem of brain tumor-related seizures/epilepsy in the context of how and when to consider antiseizure medication discontinuation. Moreover, we thoroughly evaluate the literature on antiseizure medication discontinuation for adult and pediatric patients and highlight recommendations relevant to patients with both brain tumors and seizures.

Detection of diagnostic and prognostic methylation-based signatures in liquid biopsy specimens from patients with meningiomas.

Recurrence of meningiomas is unpredictable by current invasive methods based on surgically removed specimens. Identification of patients likely to recur using noninvasive approaches could inform treatment strategy, whether intervention or monitoring. In this study, we analyze the DNA methylation levels in blood (serum and plasma) and tissue samples from 155 meningioma patients, compared to other central nervous system tumor and non-tumor entities. We discover DNA methylation markers unique to meningiomas and use artificial intelligence to create accurate and universal models for identifying and predicting meningioma recurrence, using either blood or tissue samples. Here we show that liquid biopsy is a potential noninvasive and reliable tool for diagnosing and predicting outcomes in meningioma patients. This approach can improve personalized management strategies for these patients.

Depression and anxiety in glioma patients.

AbstractGlioma patients carry the burden of having both a progressive neurological disease and cancer, and may face a variety of symptoms, including depression and anxiety. These symptoms are highly prevalent in glioma patients (median point prevalence ranging from 16-41% for depression and 24-48% for anxiety when assessed by self-report questionnaires) and have a major impact on health-related quality of life and even overall survival time. A worse overall survival time for glioma patients with depressive symptoms might be due to tumor progression and/or its supportive treatment causing depressive symptoms, an increased risk of suicide or other (unknown) factors. Much is still unclear about the etiology of depressive and anxiety symptoms in glioma. These psychiatric symptoms often find their cause in a combination of neurophysiological and psychological factors, such as the tumor and/or its treatment. Although these patients have a particular idiosyncrasy, standard treatment guidelines for depressive and anxiety disorders apply, generally recommending psychological and pharmacological treatment. Only a few nonpharmacological trials have been conducted evaluating the efficacy of psychological treatments (eg, a reminiscence therapy-based care program) in this population, which significantly reduced depressive and anxiety symptoms. No pharmacological trials have been conducted in glioma patients specifically. More well-designed trials evaluating the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments for depressive and anxiety disorders in glioma are urgently needed to successfully treat psychiatric symptoms in brain tumor patients and to improve (health-related) quality of life.

Clinical management of seizures in patients with meningiomas: Efficacy of surgical resection for seizure control and patient-tailored postoperative anti-epileptic drug management.

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor. They are slow growing and often incidentally found tumors that arise from the arachnoid villi. As they grow, they have a greater likelihood of becoming symptomatic with seizures being one of the most clinically significant symptoms. Seizures are more likely to present as a symptom of larger meningiomas and meningiomas that compress cortical areas particularly those in non-skull base locations. These seizures are often managed medically, utilizing the same anti-seizure medications that are used to treat other causes of epilepsy. We discuss common anti-seizure medications used including valproate, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam and topiramate and their common adverse effects. The goal of pharmacotherapy for seizure control is to maximize seizure control while minimizing the adverse effects of the medication. The decision to provide medical management is dependent on individual seizure history and plans for surgical treatment. Patients who did not require seizure prophylaxis before surgery are commonly prescribed seizure prophylaxis postoperatively. Symptomatic meningiomas not controlled by medical management alone are commonly evaluated for surgical resection. The efficacy of surgical resection in providing seizure freedom is dependent on several features of the tumor including tumor size, the extent of the peritumoral edema, the number of tumors, sinus infiltration and the degree of resection.

Palliative care in brain tumors.

The diagnosis of a brain tumor is a life-changing event for patients and families. High-grade gliomas (especially glioblastomas) are incurable, and long-term survival is limited. Metastatic brain lesions comprise the majority of intracranial neoplasms and are a significant source of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic cancer. Response to treatment, prognosis, and survival depends not only on the underlying pathology, but more importantly on recently defined molecular features. Other crucial predictors of survival include age and performance status. Among patients with primary brain tumors, neurologic decline and psychological distress contribute to a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life (QoL) throughout the disease trajectory. While many symptoms in central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS cancers overlap, others predominate in the brain tumor population, including seizures, headaches, depression, fatigue, and treatment-induced toxicity, all of which can be addressed with palliative interventions. Patients, families, and caregivers also report disproportionately high supportive care needs, which frequently differ from those of other systemic cancers. In addition, progressive neurologic decline often results in impaired communication and decision-making capacity at the end of life. Early palliative care (PC) integration has become more common in systemic cancers, but remains limited in neuro-oncology. These factors combined contribute to a uniquely challenging disease course that may benefit from a multidisciplinary approach with early involvement of specialized (PC) to address tumor-related symptoms and improve QoL. We review how to approach patients with brain tumors and address prognosis, symptom management, and advance care planning with the goal of improving QoL for patients, families, and caregivers.

Olutasidenib (FT-2102) in patients with relapsed or refractory IDH1-mutant glioma: A multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II trial.

BACKGROUND: Olutasidenib (FT-2102) is a highly potent, orally bioavailable, brain-penetrant and selective inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). The aim of the study was to determine the safety and clinical activity of olutasidenib in patients with relapsed/refractory gliomas harboring an IDH1R132X mutation. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, phase Ib/II clinical trial. Eligible patients (≥18 years) had histologically confirmed IDH1R132X-mutated glioma that relapsed or progressed on or following standard therapy and had measurable disease. Patients received olutasidenib, 150 mg orally twice daily (BID) in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (cycle 1) and safety in phase I and objective response rate using the Modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria in phase II. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled and followed for a median 15.1 months (7.3‒19.4). No DLTs were observed in the single-agent glioma cohort and the pharmacokinetic relationship supported olutasidenib 150 mg BID as the recommended phase II dose. In the response-evaluable population, disease control rate (objective response plus stable disease) was 48%. Two (8%) patients demonstrated a best response of partial response and eight (32%) had stable disease for at least 4 months. Grade 3‒4 adverse events (≥10%) included alanine aminotransferase increased and aspartate aminotransferase increased (three [12%], each). CONCLUSIONS: Olutasidenib 150 mg BID was well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory gliomas harboring an IDH1R132X mutation and demonstrated preliminary evidence of clinical activity in this heavily pretreated population.

Association of Autologous Tumor Lysate-Loaded Dendritic Cell Vaccination With Extension of Survival Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Phase 3 Prospective Externally Controlled Cohort Trial.

Importance: Glioblastoma is the most lethal primary brain cancer. Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor, and new treatments are needed. Objective: To investigate whether adding autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax-L) to standard of care (SOC) extends survival among patients with glioblastoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, prospective, externally controlled nonrandomized trial compared overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM) and recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) treated with DCVax-L plus SOC vs contemporaneous matched external control patients treated with SOC. This international, multicenter trial was conducted at 94 sites in 4 countries from August 2007 to November 2015. Data analysis was conducted from October 2020 to September 2021. Interventions: The active treatment was DCVax-L plus SOC temozolomide. The nGBM external control patients received SOC temozolomide and placebo; the rGBM external controls received approved rGBM therapies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary and secondary end points compared overall survival (OS) in nGBM and rGBM, respectively, with contemporaneous matched external control populations from the control groups of other formal randomized clinical trials. Results: A total of 331 patients were enrolled in the trial, with 232 randomized to the DCVax-L group and 99 to the placebo group. Median OS (mOS) for the 232 patients with nGBM receiving DCVax-L was 19.3 (95% CI, 17.5-21.3) months from randomization (22.4 months from surgery) vs 16.5 (95% CI, 16.0-17.5) months from randomization in control patients (HR = 0.80; 98% CI, 0.00-0.94; P = .002). Survival at 48 months from randomization was 15.7% vs 9.9%, and at 60 months, it was 13.0% vs 5.7%. For 64 patients with rGBM receiving DCVax-L, mOS was 13.2 (95% CI, 9.7-16.8) months from relapse vs 7.8 (95% CI, 7.2-8.2) months among control patients (HR, 0.58; 98% CI, 0.00-0.76; P < .001). Survival at 24 and 30 months after recurrence was 20.7% vs 9.6% and 11.1% vs 5.1%, respectively. Survival was improved in patients with nGBM with methylated MGMT receiving DCVax-L compared with external control patients (HR, 0.74; 98% CI, 0.55-1.00; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, adding DCVax-L to SOC resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant extension of survival for patients with both nGBM and rGBM compared with contemporaneous, matched external controls who received SOC alone. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00045968.

Palliative care and end-of-life care in adults with malignant brain tumors.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review provides updated insights, from the published literature in the past 5 years, based on the 2017 European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for palliative care in adults with malignant brain tumors. It provides an overview of palliative care options, including during the end-of-life phase for patients with malignant brain tumors. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted from 2016 to 2021 focusing on four main topics: (1) symptom management, (2) caregiver needs, (3) early palliative care, and (4) care in the end-of-life phase. An international panel of palliative care experts in neuro-oncology synthesized the literature and reported the most relevant updates. A total of 140 articles were included. RESULTS: New insights include that: Hippocampal avoidance and stereotactic radiosurgery results in a lower risk of neurocognitive decline in patients with brain metastases; levetiracetam is more efficacious in reducing seizures than valproic acid as first-line monotherapy antiseizure drug (ASD) in glioma patients; lacosamide and perampanel seem well-tolerated and efficacious add-on ASDs; and a comprehensive framework of palliative and supportive care for high-grade glioma patients and their caregivers was proposed. No pharmacological agents have been shown in randomized controlled trials to significantly improve fatigue or neurocognition. CONCLUSIONS: Since the 2017 EANO palliative care guidelines, new insights have been reported regarding symptom management and end-of-life care, however, most recommendations remain unchanged. Early palliative care interventions are essential to define goals of care and minimize symptom burden in a timely fashion. Interventional studies that address pain, fatigue, and psychiatric symptoms as well as (the timing of) early palliative care are urgently needed.

Coping with glioblastoma: prognostic communication and prognostic understanding among patients with recurrent glioblastoma, caregivers, and oncologists.

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating neuro-oncologic disease with invariably poor prognosis. Despite this, research shows patients have unrealistic perceptions of their prognosis, which may relate in part to communication patterns between patients, caregivers and oncologists. The purpose of this study was to examine communication processes and goals among patients, caregivers, and oncologists to elucidate drivers of prognostic understanding (PU) in the context of recurrent GBM. METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-center study enrolling adult patients with GBM, caregivers, and oncologists, who independently reported the content of a specific discussion involving the disclosure of GBM recurrence. Communication processes and goals were characterized for each participant, and concordance between all dyads and patient-caregiver-oncologist triads were calculated. RESULTS: Seventeen patient, caregiver, and oncologist triads were analyzed. At the individual level, three (17.6%) patients and 8 (47.1%) caregivers reported having discussed prognosis during the clinical encounter, as compared to ten oncologists (58.8%). Seven patients (41.2%) and 5 caregivers (29.4%), versus thirteen oncologists (76.5%) reported ever discussing prognosis or life expectancy at previous appointments. Generally, patient-caregiver concordance (i.e., both answered the same) regarding communication goals and processes was low. Triads showed limited concordant responses in discussing curability (n = 5), prognosis (n = 4), end-of-life treatment goals (n = 4), and ever discussing prognosis (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Patients, caregivers and oncologists had discordant views regarding communication processes and prognostic goals, even when recalling a single discussion. This study highlights the importance of clear and frequent communication about prognosis, and the need for further research on communication and PU in the neuro-oncology setting.

Detection of tumor-specific DNA methylation markers in the blood of patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: DNA methylation abnormalities are pervasive in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). The feasibility to detect methylome alterations in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been reported for several central nervous system (CNS) tumors but not across PitNETs. The aim of the study was to use the liquid biopsy (LB) approach to detect PitNET-specific methylation signatures to differentiate these tumors from other sellar diseases. METHODS: We profiled the cfDNA methylome (EPIC array) of 59 serum and 41 plasma LB specimens from patients with PitNETs and other CNS diseases (sellar tumors and other pituitary non-neoplastic diseases, lower-grade gliomas, and skull-base meningiomas) or nontumor conditions, grouped as non-PitNET. RESULTS: Our results indicated that despite quantitative and qualitative differences between serum and plasma cfDNA composition, both sources of LB showed that patients with PitNETs presented a distinct methylome landscape compared to non-PitNETs. In addition, LB methylomes captured epigenetic features reported in PitNET tissue and provided information about cell-type composition. Using LB-derived PitNETs-specific signatures as input to develop machine-learning predictive models, we generated scores that distinguished PitNETs from non-PitNETs conditions, including sellar tumor and non-neoplastic pituitary diseases, with accuracies above ~93% in independent cohort sets. CONCLUSIONS: Our results underpin the potential application of methylation-based LB profiling as a noninvasive approach to identify clinically relevant epigenetic markers to diagnose and potentially impact the prognostication and management of patients with PitNETs.

Neuro-oncology and supportive care: the role of the neurologist.

The diagnosis of a brain tumor is a life-changing event for patients and their families. Despite numerous treatment advances, malignant brain tumors are universally incurable and long-term survival is limited. Treatment response, prognosis, and survival depend on underlying histopathology and recently defined molecular features. Patients suffer from a disproportionately high symptom burden throughout the disease trajectory and at the end of life. Pronounced neurologic decline and psychological distress significantly impair quality of life (QoL) and impose high supportive care needs relative to other systemic cancers. Palliative interventions addressing brain tumor-specific symptoms, such as seizures, cognitive dysfunction, and headaches, are paramount to maintaining QoL. In the terminal phase of illness, most brain tumor patients lose the ability to communicate and participate in end-of-life decision-making. The benefits of advance care planning and early integration of specialized palliative care are well-established in other systemic cancers and have received wider recognition in neuro-oncology. We review how to approach neurological symptoms in brain tumor patients, as well as address prognosis and advance care planning with the goal of improving QoL for patients and caregivers.

Health-related quality of life in meningioma.

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults. Although frequently histologically benign, the clinical severity of a lesion may range from being asymptomatic to causing severe impairment of global function and well-being. The diversity of intracranial locations and clinical phenotypes poses a challenge when studying functional impairments, however, more recent attention to patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have helped to improve our understanding of how meningioma may impact a patient's life. METHODS: Treatment strategies such as observation, surgery, radiation, or a combination thereof have been examined to ascertain their contributions to symptoms, physical and cognitive functioning, disability, and general aspects of daily functioning. RESULTS: This review explores the multidimensional nature of HRQOL and how patients may be influenced by meningiomas and their treatment. CONCLUSION: Overall, treatment of symptomatic meningiomas is associated with improved HRQOL, cognitive functioning, and seizure control while tumor size, location, histologic grade, and epileptic burden are associated with worse HRQOL.

Systematic review on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in brain tumor studies: part of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Patient-Reported Outcome (RANO-PRO) initiative.

BACKGROUND: The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Patient-Reported Outcome (RANO-PRO) working group aims to provide guidance on the use of PROs in brain tumor patients. PRO measures should be of high quality, both in terms of relevance and other measurement properties. This systematic review aimed to identify PRO measures that have been used in brain tumor studies to date. METHODS: A systematic literature search for articles published up to June 25, 2020 was conducted in several electronic databases. Pre-specified inclusion criteria were used to identify studies using PRO measures assessing symptoms, (instrumental) activities of daily living [(I)ADL] or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult patients with glioma, meningioma, primary central nervous system lymphoma, or brain metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 215 different PRO measures were identified in 571 published and 194 unpublished studies. The identified PRO measures include brain tumor-specific, cancer-specific, and generic instruments, as well as instruments designed for other indications or multi- or single-item study-specific questionnaires. The most frequently used instruments were the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 (n = 286 and n = 247), and the FACT-Br (n = 167), however, the majority of the instruments were used only once or twice (150/215). CONCLUSION: Many different PRO measures assessing symptoms, (I)ADL or HRQoL have been used in brain tumor studies to date. Future research should clarify whether these instruments or their scales/items exhibit good content validity and other measurement properties for use in brain tumor patients.

SNO and EANO practice guideline update: Anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2000 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice parameter on anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. METHODS: Following the 2017 AAN methodologies, a systematic literature review utilizing PubMed, EMBASE Library, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was performed. The studies were rated based on the AAN therapeutic or causation classification of evidence (class I-IV). RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles were selected for final analysis. There were limited high-level, class I studies and mostly class II and III studies. The AAN affirmed the value of these guidelines. RECOMMENDATIONS: In patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors who have not had a seizure, clinicians should not prescribe antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to reduce the risk of seizures (level A). In brain tumor patients undergoing surgery, there is insufficient evidence to recommend prescribing AEDs to reduce the risk of seizures in the peri- or postoperative period (level C). There is insufficient evidence to support prescribing valproic acid or levetiracetam with the intent to prolong progression-free or overall survival (level C). Physicians may consider the use of levetiracetam over older AEDs to reduce side effects (level C). There is insufficient evidence to support using tumor location, histology, grade, molecular/imaging features when deciding whether or not to prescribe prophylactic AEDs (level U).

Caregiver perceptions of end-of-life care in patients with high-grade glioma.

BACKGROUND: Patients dying from high-grade gliomas (HGG) suffer from high symptom burden in the end-of-life (EoL) phase. Family caregivers are most informed about the patient's symptoms and disease course. The aim of this study is to assess caregiver perception on quality of EoL care of HGG patients. METHODS: Caregivers prospectively participated in the Toolkit After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview, part of the Toolkit of Instruments to Measure End-of-Life Care (TIME survey). This validated survey assesses EoL care in areas such as physical comfort and emotional support, advance care planning, focus on the individual, attention to family, and coordination of care. The quality of EoL care was measured by domain scores (0 = care was always optimal, 1 = care was always suboptimal) or with a 0-10 scale. RESULTS: Of the 55 enrolled family caregivers, 44 completed the interview and rated the overall care high (8.90 ± 1.36/10), perceived that patients' wishes were respected (9.46 ± 0.95) and that they died in dignity (9.65 ± 0.98). Caregivers perceived high satisfaction with information and decision-making (0.18), advance care planning (0.19), focus on the individual (0.16), and care coordination (0.11). Attention to family (0.25) needed improvement. Only 41% of caregivers were confident that they knew what to do at the time of death and 46% felt that the healthcare team did not provide them with someone to turn to in distress. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers reported high overall satisfaction with EoL HGG care, though attention to family and communication needed improvement. Focus should therefore be on improved caregiver communication to improve EoL care, caregiver burnout, and bereavement in HGG populations.