Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of neoadjuvant celecoxib in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: evaluation of drug-specific biomarkers.

PURPOSE: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is a potential pharmacologic target for the prevention of various malignancies, including prostate cancer. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to examine the effect of celecoxib on drug-specific biomarkers from prostate tissue obtained at prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with localized prostate cancer and Gleason sum > or = 7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > or = 15 ng/mL, clinical stage T2b or greater, or any combination with greater than 45% risk of capsular penetration were randomly assigned to celecoxib 400 mg by mouth twice daily or placebo for 4 to 6 weeks before prostatectomy. The primary end point was the difference in prostatic prostaglandin levels between the two groups. Secondary end points were differences in COX-1 and -2 expressions; oxidized DNA bases; and markers of proliferation, apoptosis and angiogenesis. Tissue celecoxib concentrations also were measured. Tertiary end points were drug safety and compliance. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients consented, and 64 were randomly assigned and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. There were no treatment differences in any of the primary or secondary outcomes. Multivariable regression revealed that tumor tissue had significantly lower COX-2 expression than benign prostatic tissue (P = .01) and significantly higher levels of the proliferation marker Ki-67 (P < .0001). Celecoxib was measurable in prostate tissue of patients on treatment, demonstrating that celecoxib reached its target. Celecoxib was safe and resulted in only grade 1 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 4 to 6 weeks of celecoxib had no effect on intermediate biomarkers of prostate carcinogenesis, despite the achievement of measurable tissue levels. We caution against using celecoxib 400 mg twice daily as a preventive agent for prostate cancer in additional studies.

Prostate cancer: a practical approach to current management of recurrent disease.

Prostate cancer is the leading cause of cancer in men in the United States, with 234,460 men expected to be diagnosed as having the disease in 2006 (33% of cancers in men), and the third leading cause of cancer deaths in men, with 27,350 men expected to die of the disease (9% of cancer deaths). Through early detection and improved local therapies, including surgery or radiation therapy, a large number of men will be cured, but unfortunately, a significant number of men will still experience relapse of disease and require continued surveillance and ongoing therapy. This article discusses approaches to treatment of men who have recurrent disease, including active surveillance, androgen ablation therapy, secondary hormone therapy, chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, radiation therapy, and future directions.

A phase II trial of temozolomide and IFN-alpha in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

The combination of temozolomide (TEM) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) previously demonstrated a 30% response rate in metastatic melanoma. A single institution, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of TEM/IFN in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was conducted. Safety and tumor response were the main outcomes. Eligible patients received 200 mg/m(2)/day TEM orally on days 1-5 every 28 days, with IFN 2.5 million U/m(2)/day subcutaneously (s.c.) three alternate days/week for days 1-15 first cycle, then 5 million U/m(2)/day s.c. 3 alternate days/week throughout each 28-day cycle. Efficacy was evaluated every 8 weeks, and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were treated with dose reductions of the culprit drug. Sixteen patients (ages 37-67) were initially enrolled. Of the 14 evaluable patients, there was one minor response. Best response was stable disease, with 7 patients remaining on study for > or =6 months. Five were alive for more than 2 years, and 2 remain alive at 45 and 50 months after enrollment. DLTs included TEM-induced myelosuppression and IFN-induced fever/chills. Other toxicities were mild to moderate (grades 1-3). The combination of TEM/IFN proved quite tolerable. This regimen appears inactive in terms of response in this population with poor prognosis, but the patients with stable disease > or =6 months remain of interest.

Phase 3 randomized trial evaluating second-line hormonal therapy versus docetaxel-estramustine combination chemotherapy on progression-free survival in asymptomatic patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen level after hormonal therapy for prostate cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1899), Intergroup/Clinical Trials Support Unit study.

Despite improvements in early detection of prostate cancer when it is clinically localized--and therefore most amenable to curative local therapies-- approximately 33% of men with early prostate cancer will develop biochemical failure with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) during follow-up. The early use of androgen suppression in this group of men has changed the clinical picture of androgen-independent disease. Now, there are men on androgen suppression who will develop biochemical failure and remain free of clinical or radiographic evidence of metastatic disease for a period of time. There is no standard approach to this group of men, who have a rising PSA on androgen deprivation, because there are little or no data about strategies that may improve survival, delay time to progression, or improve quality of life. Therefore, current management of this population remains controversial. In an effort to determine which of these 2 approaches--second-line hormone therapy or chemotherapy--is optimal in delaying the time to progression, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) developed protocol E1899. Although both approaches offer the potential for response (reduction in PSA and prolonging the time to clinical progression), they have very different toxicity profiles, making impact on quality of life another important end point. This randomized trial evaluating second-line hormonal therapy using ketoconazole and hydrocortisone versus docetaxel and estramustine combination chemotherapy on progression-free survival in asymptomatic men with a rising PSA on androgen ablation for prostate cancer is the subject of this article.

Pharmacological treatments for prostate cancer.

Recently, chemotherapy for prostate cancer has been primarily reserved for the palliation of symptoms secondary to prostate cancer. Chemotherapy regimens and new approaches are being developed that offer new hope of response and improved survival to men with prostate cancer. This paper discusses pharmacological strategies that are under investigation: cytotoxic agents and biological or targeted therapies, including the microtubule inhibitors (taxane/taxoids, vinorelbine) alone and in novel combinations with other experimental agents such calcitriol, thalidomide or flavopiridol (cell-cycle inhibitor) and treatment with epothilone analogues; endothelin receptor antagonists; other novel strategies such as vaccine therapy (GVAX; Cell Genesys) and prostate-specific membrane antibodies; and bisphosphonates.