A phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (Caelyx) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine as second-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

The purpose of this study was to determine the recommended phase II dose of liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx ; Doxil in the United States) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine for previously treated patients with good performance status with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer. Twenty-one eligible patients were enrolled between November 1999 and September 2001 and received liposomal doxorubicin 25-40 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750-1000 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 intravenously (I.V.) every 21 days. At doses of liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 I.V., 1 of 6 patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and fever in cycle 2 and 2 of 6 developed grade 3 hand-foot syndrome during cycle 3. Therefore, the recommended phase II doses are liposomal doxorubicin 35 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 I.V. every 21 days. Antitumor activity was seen at all dose levels. This combination is well tolerated and has evidence of antitumor activity. A phase II evaluation is ongoing.

Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy added to tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with node-positive estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer: a report of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Breast Cancer Site Group.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: By the mid 1980s, tamoxifen alone was considered standard adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with node-positive, estrogen receptor (ER)- or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive breast cancer. From 1984 through 1990, 705 eligible postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER- or PgR-positive breast cancer were randomized to a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) study that compared tamoxifen 30 mg by mouth daily for 2 years (TAM) versus TAM plus chemotherapy with all-intravenous cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 given every 21 days for eight cycles (CMF). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, or distant recurrence-free survival between the two treatment arms. However, there was significantly greater severe toxicity, which included leukopenia (P < .0001), nausea and vomiting (P < .0001), and thromboembolic events (P < .0001), as well as significantly more mild or greater toxicity, which included thrombocytopenia (P = .04), anemia (P = .02), infection (P = .0004), mucositis (P = .0001), diarrhea (P = .0001), and neurologic toxicity (P = .006), in women who received TAM plus CMF. CONCLUSION: The addition of CMF to TAM adds no benefit and considerable toxicity in this group of women.

Phase I-II study of high-dose epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase I multicenter trial was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin, given on 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks to previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After appropriate staging and a baseline multiple-gated angiogram (MUGA) scan, at least four patients were entered at each dose level, starting at 35 mg/m2 of epirubicin given intravenously (IV) daily for 3 days (105 mg/m2) and escalating by 5 mg/m2 per injection in each dose level (15 mg/m2 per course). Epirubicin was administered up to a maximum dose of 60 mg/m2/d for 3 days (180 mg/m2). The MTD was determined to be 55 mg/m2/d for 3 days (165 mg/m2) after treating a total of 35 (33 assessable) patients. Nadir granulocyte counts and associated febrile episodes comprised the dose-limiting toxicity, but there were no treatment-related deaths. A phase II trial was performed using a dose of 50 mg/m2/d for 3 days (150 mg/m2) every 3 weeks with no dose escalation, but with dose reduction for toxicity as required. A total of 30 patients were entered onto this phase of the study. RESULTS: The major toxicity, as in the phase I trial, was neutropenia with five febrile episodes, again with no treatment-related deaths. An overall response rate of 12 of 63 (19%) was noted in the combined patient population of the phase I-II trial, with 95% confidence intervals of 10% to 31%. When the response rate was analyzed by histology, only one of 17 (6%) patients with squamous histology, as compared with 11 of 46 (24%) with non-squamous histology, responded, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose epirubicin is tolerable and is an active single agent in NSCLC. It should be combined with relatively nonmyelosuppressive agents such as cisplatin to try to obtain higher response rates and extend the survival in this disease.

Phase II study of acivicin as a 72-hr continuous infusion in patients with untreated colorectal cancer. A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study.

The National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Clinical Trials Group has carried out a phase II study of acivicin given as a 72-hour continuous infusion in previously untreated patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Toxicity in 24 patients was mild to moderate and consisted primarily of GI symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or CNS changes including drowsiness, lethargy, dizziness. No responses were seen in 23 evaluable patients. We did not find acivicin given as described to be effective in colorectal carcinoma.