Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Immunol ; 7(4): 327-32, 1987 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3611299

RESUMO

In order to compare the antibody response in serum and secretions from healthy young subjects and the elderly (greater than 60 years), volunteers were immunized with the commercial inactivated influenza virus vaccine, by the usual (parenteral) route or orally. Also, young and old mice (mean age, 20 months) were orally immunized with live influenza virus. The older mice responded with a very slight rise in their serum and respiratory tract antibody levels compared with the young mice but showed no diminution in protection against lethal viral challenge. Elderly volunteers showed only slight serum antibody responses after parenteral immunization compared with the young. Neither group demonstrated a rise in serum antibody following oral immunization. With respect to the secretory IgA (SIgA) antibody response, certain differences were noted between the young and the elderly: the preimmunization levels of antibody to influenza virus were significantly greater in nasal secretions and saliva in the elderly as compared to the young volunteers, and the salivary antibody response was diminished in the elderly. This lack of a salivary antibody response in the elderly was explicable by the inverse relationship between the preimmunization SIgA antibody titers and the response to immunization. Oral immunization led to no more side effects than observed in the placebo control group.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/biossíntese , Vacinas contra Influenza/farmacologia , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A Secretora/biossíntese , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Nasal/imunologia , Saliva/imunologia
2.
Am J Med Sci ; 292(6): 367-71, 1986 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3541604

RESUMO

Secretory IgA antibody may be important in protection against respiratory viral infections, and the concept of a common mucosal immune system offers the theoretical basis for the convenient stimulation of this antibody. Therefore, the oral route was compared with intramuscular injection in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in young healthy volunteers. A killed influenza vaccine, given in enteric-coated capsules (total of 98 ug hemagglutinin of A/Bangkok) led to significant salivary and nasal IgA antibody rises in a 4-week period. The preimmunization titers in secretions were inversely correlated with the antibody rise after immunization. The orally administered vaccine was associated with no more side effects than placebo, in contradistinction to reactions following the intramuscular route. The latter route also was without significant effect in regard to a stimulation of secretory antibodies. The observed simultaneous induction of antibodies in saliva and nasal secretions following oral administration of killed vaccine gives further evidence of a common mucosal immune system and its possible clinical use.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/metabolismo , Imunização , Imunoglobulina A Secretora/biossíntese , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adulto , Cápsulas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Distribuição Aleatória
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...