Effect of age on ankle biomechanics and tibial compression during stair descent.

BACKGROUND: Stress fracture is a concern among older adults, as age-related decrements in ankle neuromuscular function may impair their ability to attenuate tibial compressive forces experienced during daily locomotor tasks, such as stair descent. Yet, it is unknown if older adults exhibit greater tibial compression than their younger counterparts when descending stairs. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do older adults exhibit differences in ankle biomechanics that alter their tibial compression during stair descent compared to young adults, and is there a relation between tibial compression and specific changes in ankle biomechanics? METHODS: Thirteen young (18-25 years) and 13 older (> 65 years) adults had ankle joint biomechanics and tibial compression quantified during a stair descent. Discrete ankle biomechanics (peak joint angle and moment, and joint stiffness) and tibial compression (maximum and impulse) measures were submitted to an independent t-test, while ankle joint angle and moment, and tibial compression waveforms were submitted to an independent statistical parametric mapping t-test to determine group differences. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) determined the relation between discrete ankle biomechanics and tibial compression measures for all participants, and each group. RESULTS: Older adults exhibited smaller maximum tibial compression (p = 0.004) from decreases in peak ankle joint angle and moment between 17 % and 34 % (p = 0.035), and 20-31 % of stance (p < 0.001) than young adults. Ankle biomechanics exhibited a negligible to weak correlation with tibial compression for all participants, with peak ankle joint moment and maximum tibial compression (r = -0.48 ±â€¯0.32) relation the strongest. Older adults typically exhibited a stronger relation between ankle biomechanics and tibial compression (e.g., r = -0.48 ±â€¯0.47 vs r = -0.27 ±â€¯0.52 between peak ankle joint moment and maximum tibial compression). SIGNIFICANCE: Older adults altered ankle biomechanics and decreased maximum tibial compression to safely execute the stair descent. Yet, specific alterations in ankle biomechanics could not be identified as a predictor of changes in tibial compression.

Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting "hub and hub" model.

Objective: To examine referral pattern, the timing of diagnostic/staging processes, and treatment initiation for new head and neck cancer patients in a community setting. Methods: Patients with a newly diagnosed previously untreated diagnosis of head neck cancer managed at Asplundh Cancer Pavilion/Abington Memorial Hospital from October 2018 to March 2020. Source of referral and preceding workup were examined as well as intervals between initial head and neck consult and various timepoints of treatment initiation. Results: One hundred and five patients were included in the study. The primary referral sources were external general otolaryngology (56.3%). Oral surgery and dermatology obtained tissue biopsy approximately 80% of the time before referral. The average time from the ordering of initial staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography to finalized results was 14 days (range: 10-25 days). Patients referred from dermatology and oral surgery were more likely to require single modality care, namely definitive surgical management. Time to treatment initiation average was 37 days (range: 29-41 days). Patients with longer treatment times noted significantly higher times to both radiation and medical oncology consults (48.42 vs. 18.13 days; P < 0.001). Conclusions: No notable differences in treatment initiation times were identified based on referral source or extent of workup performed before head/neck surgery consult. It appears the largest opportunities for improvement in terms of reducing overall treatment length exist in the optimization of radiation initiation time.

Tibial compression during sustained walking with body borne load.

This study determined if sustained walking with body borne load increases tibial compression, and whether increases in tibial compression are related to vertical GRFs. Thirteen participants had tibial compression and vertical GRF measures quantified while walking at 1.3 m/s for 60 min with body borne load. Each tibial compression (maximum and impulse) and GRF measure (peak, impulse, impact peak and loading rate) were submitted to a RM ANOVA to test the main effect and interaction between load (0, 15, and 30 kg) and time (minute 0, 30 and 60), and correlation analyses determined the relation between tibial compression and vertical GRF measures for each load and time. Each tibial compression and GRF measure increased with the addition of body borne load (all: p < 0.001). Time impacted impact peak (p = 0.034) and loading rate (p = 0.017), but no other GRF or tibial compression measure (p > 0.05). Although both tibial compression and vertical GRFs increased with load, vertical GRF measures exhibited negligible to weak (r: -0.37 to 0.35), and weak to moderate (r: -0.62 to 0.59) relation with maximum and impulse of tibial compression with each body borne load. At each time point, GRF measures exhibited negligible to weak (r: -0.39 to 0.27), and weak to moderate (r: -0.53 to 0.65) relation with maximum and impulse of tibial compression, respectively. Walking with body borne load increased tibial compression, and may place compressive forces on the tibia that lead to stress fracture. But, increases in tibial compression may not stem from concurrent increases in vertical GRFs.