Catheter Directed Thrombectomy and Other Deep Venous Interventions in Cancer Patients.

Treating cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis/venous thromboembolism (DVT/VTE) can be challenging as patients are frequently unable to receive the standard therapy of anticoagulation due to the increased risk of bleeding complications seen in this population. Similarly, the hesitation of interventionalists to use thrombolytic agents due to bleeding risks limits percutaneous intervention options as well. Further, outcome data and guidelines do not exist for oncologic patients and often treatment is tailored to patient-specific factors after multidisciplinary discussion. This article reviews specific factors to consider when planning percutaneous treatment of cancer patients with DVT/VTE, focusing on the iliocaval system.

Predictors for Nonhome Patient Discharge following Lower Extremity Arterial Interventions.

PURPOSE: To identify the variables associated with patient discharge disposition to optimize postprocedural care and discharge planning following lower extremity arterial interventions for peripheral artery disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2014-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried using current procedural terminology codes for endovascular infrainguinal interventions for PAD. The main outcome variable of interest was nonhome discharge. Covariates included patient sociodemographic variables, age quartile (upper quartile, ≥77 years), comorbidities (diabetes, renal disease, bleeding disorder, congestive heart failure [CHF], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), presence of an open wound before a procedure, type of procedure, operative time, symptom severity, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and baseline functional status. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed on Stata/SE 15.1. RESULTS: A total of 3,190 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 664 (20.8%) had nonhome discharge. Multivariate regression revealed that age (odds ratio [OR], 1.9 for the upper age quartile [>77 years]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-2.50), operative time (OR, 1.2 per increase in quartile; 95% CI, 1.09-1.30), preoperative wound (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.24-1.90), renal failure (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.30-2.14), CHF (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.51-3.24), symptom severity (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.46-1.98), and independent functional status (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.92; P = .007) were associated with nonhome discharge. All P values were ≤.001 unless otherwise stated. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged procedural time, the presence of preprocedural wound and patient comorbidities, symptomatology, and baseline functional status may be used to identify patients who will require a nonhome discharge and early discharge planning.

Insulin-Dependent Status Influences Post-Procedural Outcomes in Diabetic Patients Following Lower Extremity Endovascular Intervention for Peripheral Arterial Disease.

PURPOSE: Diabetic patients are at increased risk of developing lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) requiring revascularization. This study assessed the effect of insulin dependence in diabetics on post-procedural outcomes following infra-inguinal endovascular intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify 8022 patients undergoing infra-inguinal endovascular interventions between 2014 and 2017. Thirty-day post-procedural outcomes for patients without diabetes, with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) were compared. RESULTS: At presentation, IDDM patients were more likely to present with critical limb ischemia compared to NIDDM and non-diabetic patients. In propensity score-weighted logistic regression analysis, IDDM status was an independent predictor for increased renal complication (odds ratio [OR] = 3.08, confidence interval [CI] = 1.44-6.65), sepsis (OR = 1.68, CI = 1.13-2.48), wound complication (OR = 1.57, CI = 1.09-2.25, p = 0.006), UTI (OR = 2.07, CI = 1.09-3.94, p = 0.03), and readmission (OR = 1.21, CI = 1.03-1.42). NIDDM status was an independent predictor for increased risk of renal complications (OR = 2.80, CI = 1.18-6.63). CONCLUSIONS: IDDM status is an independent predictor for increased risk of 30-day post-procedural complications and readmission compared to both NIDDM and non-diabetic status in patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular interventions for PAD.

Endobronchial forceps-assisted complex retrieval of inferior vena cava filters.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of endobronchial forceps-assisted retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters when standard retrieval techniques fail. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved single-center retrospective review during a 6-year period identified 60 consecutive patients (23 men and 37 women; mean age, 49.3 years; range, 19-77 years) in whom rigid endobronchial forceps were required for IVC filter retrieval after standard techniques failed. Factors affecting retrieval success, including an embedded or tilted filter, overall dwell time, filter fracture, and caval penetration, were recorded, as were success rates, procedural details, and complications. RESULTS: Mean dwell time between filter placement and removal was 565 days (range, 15-7366 days). Various IVC filters were encountered: 33 Option (Argon Medical, Frisco, Tex), 8 Celect (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind), 9 Günther Tulip (Cook Medical), 4 G2 and 3 Eclipse (Bard, Murray Hill, NJ), 2 OptEase (Cordis, Bridgewater, NJ), and 1 Simon Nitinol (Bard). Imaging before retrieval showed grade 1 (3/60), grade 2 (44/60), and grade 3 (13/60) filter interaction with IVC wall. The degree of secondary tilt as assessed on images acquired before attempted retrieval was <10 degrees (n = 22; 36.7%), 10 to 20 degrees (n = 26; 43.3%), and >20 degrees (n = 12; 20%), with an average tilt of 13.8 degrees (range, 0-48.9 degrees). Of the 60 filters, 58 were retrieved successfully (96.7%). Two of these required a second attempt (one because of migration into the right atrium and the other because of extreme discomfort of the patient requiring subsequent general anesthesia). Five of 60 procedures were forceps-assisted loop snare retrievals in which the forceps were used to dissect the embedded hook free from surrounding hyperplastic caval venous endothelium. Mean fluoroscopy retrieval time was 33.2 minutes (range, 10-76.9 minutes). Intraprocedural inconsequential filter fracture was observed in 10 patients. There were four complications: one retroperitoneal hemorrhage, one IVC dissection flap, and two filter fractures with subsequent migration of filter components to the right side of the heart and to the right pulmonary artery. The first two complications required hospital admission and conservative management; in the last two, the fractured and migrated filter limbs were retrieved successfully using a snare device. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid endobronchial forceps can be safely and reliably used to remove embedded, fractured, or tilted retrievable IVC filters from patients in whom standard retrieval techniques are unsuccessful. There is a high success rate and minimal complications. We propose that the degree of filter tilt, caval penetration, and filter fracture are predictive of the need for the use of forceps as a first-line retrieval technique.

Complications of endovascular aneurysm repair of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: evaluation and management.

In recent decades, endovascular aneurysm repair or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become an acceptable alternative to open surgery for the treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms and other aortic pathologies such as the acute aortic syndromes (e.g., penetrating aortic ulcer, intramural hematoma, dissection). Available data suggest that endovascular repair is associated with lower perioperative 30-day all-cause mortality as well as a significant reduction in perioperative morbidity when compared to open surgery. Additionally, EVAR leads to decreased blood loss, eliminates the need for cross-clamping the aorta and has shorter recovery periods than traditional surgery. It is currently the preferred mode of treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms in a subset of patients who meet certain anatomic criteria conducive to endovascular repair. The main disadvantage of EVAR procedures is the high rate of post-procedural complications that often require secondary re-intervention. As a result, most authorities recommend lifelong imaging surveillance following repair. Available surveillance modalities include conventional radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography, ultrasonography, nuclear imaging and conventional angiography, with computed tomography currently considered to be the gold standard for surveillance by most experts. Following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, the rate of complications is estimated to range between 16% and 30%. The complication rate is higher following thoracic EVAR (TEVAR) and is estimated to be as high as 38%. Common complications include both those related to the endograft device and systemic complications. Device-related complications include endoleaks, endograft migration or collapse, kinking and/or stenosis of an endograft limb and graft infection. Post-procedural systemic complications include end-organ ischemia, cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events and post-implantation syndrome. Secondary re-interventions are required in approximately 19% to 24% of cases following endovascular abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysm repair respectively. Typically, most secondary reinterventions involve the use of percutaneous techniques such as placement of cuff extension devices, additional endograft components or stents, enhancement of endograft fixation, treatment of certain endoleaks using various embolization techniques and embolic agents and thrombolysis of occluded endograft components. Less commonly, surgical conversion and/or open surgical modification are required. In this article, we provide an overview of the most common complications that may occur following endovascular repair of thoracic and AAAs. We also summarize the current surveillance recommendations for detecting and evaluating these complications and discuss various current secondary re-intervention approaches that may typically be employed for treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Catheter-Directed Therapies as a Supplement to Surgical Decompression in Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of endovascular therapy in the management of venous thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), with an emphasis on its role after surgical decompression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective review identified all patients who underwent conventional contrast-enhanced venography as a component of the imaging evaluation of clinically suspected venous TOS from January 2004 through September 2015. Eighty-one patients were identified, with a mean (± SD) age of 33 ± 12 years, of whom 59% (48/81) were women. After imaging confirmation of venous TOS, a standardized treatment protocol combining surgical and endovascular intervention was used for management. RESULTS: Of the 81 patients included in the study, 73 (90%) had angiographic evidence of venous TOS; 41 of these 73 patients (56%) underwent endovascular venous intervention (e.g., thrombolysis or angioplasty before surgical) decompression. A total of 67 patients (67/73; 92%) with venous TOS underwent surgical decompression, with 56 of these (56/73; 77%) undergoing postoperative venography. Of these 56 patients who underwent postoperative venography, 48 (86%) required venoplasty, four had normal-appearing subclavian veins (7%) and had no intervention, and four of 48 (8%) had chronic total venous occlusions that could not be recanalized. Only four of the 48 of the patients (8%) who underwent postdecompression venoplasty required subsequent repeat venography and intervention for management of persistent or recurrent symptoms, whereas all others (44/48; 92%) remained symptom free on clinical follow-up. No complications were identified that were related to the endovascular interventions. CONCLUSION: Combining venography and endovascular venous intervention with surgical decompression in managing patients with clinically suspected venous TOS is safe and effective. Postdecompression venoplasty appears to be highly effective, with a low rate of symptom recurrence.

Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee.

PURPOSE: To develop a new adverse event (AE) classification for the interventional radiology (IR) procedures and evaluate its clinical, research, and educational value compared with the existing Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification via an SIR member survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new AE classification was developed by members of the Standards of Practice Committee of the SIR. Subsequently, a survey was created by a group of 18 members from the SIR Standards of Practice Committee and Service Lines. Twelve clinical AE case scenarios were generated that encompassed a broad spectrum of IR procedures and potential AEs. Survey questions were designed to evaluate the following domains: educational and research values, accountability for intraprocedural challenges, consistency of AE reporting, unambiguity, and potential for incorporation into existing quality-assurance framework. For each AE scenario, the survey participants were instructed to answer questions about the proposed and existing SIR classifications. SIR members were invited via online survey links, and 68 members participated among 140 surveyed. Answers on new and existing classifications were evaluated and compared statistically. Overall comparison between the two surveys was performed by generalized linear modeling. RESULTS: The proposed AE classification received superior evaluations in terms of consistency of reporting (P < .05) and potential for incorporation into existing quality-assurance framework (P < .05). Respondents gave a higher overall rating to the educational and research value of the new compared with the existing classification (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study proposed an AE classification system that outperformed the existing SIR classification in the studied domains.

Long term follow-up of endo-vascular recanalization of chronic inferior vena cava occlusion secondary to inferior vena cava filters.

BACKGROUND: The long term efficacy of endovascular recanalization for chronic iliocaval occlusion secondary to inferior vena cava (IVC) filters is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of endovascular recanalization and stent placement across the filter in patients with filter-associated chronic iliocaval occlusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients (mean age 56 ± 15 yrs; seven males) with symptomatic chronic iliocaval occlusion and occluded IVC filter were included. Immediate technical success rate, long term clinical effectiveness of endovascular recanalization and patency rate of the stents were assessed. RESULTS: In all patients, the endovascular treatment consisted of percutaneous venous access, recanalization of the occluded iliac veins and the IVC, transluminal angioplasty and stenting of the infrarenal inferior vena cava and iliac veins with self-expanding stents. The IVC filter was not removed, but rather the stents were extended across the filter. In four of seven patients (57 %), adjunctive pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis was performed. All patients received anticoagulation post procedure. The mean clinical follow-up was 51.1 ± 27 months. Technical success rate was 100 %. Clinical success rate with symptomatic improvement was 85.7 %; one patient developed post-thrombotic syndrome on long term follow-up despite initial symptomatic improvement. Poststenting, the primary patency rate was 85.7 % (six of seven patients) and the secondary patency rate was 100 % (seven of seven patients). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular recanalization with balloon angioplasty and placement of a self-expanding stent across a chronically occluded IVC filer can be performed safely and effectively for patients with symptomatic iliocaval thrombosis. An adjunctive pharmacologic-mechanical thrombolysis may be considered for selected patients.

Novel and Advanced Techniques for Complex IVC Filter Retrieval.

OPINION STATEMENT: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement is indicated for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with a contraindication to or a failure of anticoagulation. With the advent of retrievable IVC filters and their ease of placement, an increasing number of such filters are being inserted for prophylaxis in patients at high risk for VTE. Available data show that only a small number of these filters are retrieved within the recommended period, if at all, prompting the FDA to issue a statement on the need for their timely removal. With prolonged dwell times, advanced techniques may be needed for filter retrieval in up to 60% of the cases. In this article, we review standard and advanced IVC filter retrieval techniques including single-access, dual-access, and dissection techniques. Complicated filter retrievals carry a non-negligible risk for complications such as filter fragmentation and resultant embolization of filter components, venous pseudoaneurysms or stenoses, and breach of the integrity of the caval wall. Careful pre-retrieval assessment of IVC filter position, any significant degree of filter tilting or of hook, and/or strut epithelialization and caval wall penetration by filter components should be considered using dedicated cross-sectional imaging for procedural planning. In complex cases, the risk for retrieval complications should be carefully weighed against the risks of leaving the filter permanently indwelling. The decision to remove an embedded IVC filter using advanced techniques should be individualized to each patient and made with caution, based on the patient's age and existing comorbidities.

Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling: experience in 327 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe findings and outcomes of 331 bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) procedures performed in 327 patients evaluated for Cushing disease (CD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiology department's electronic database was searched to identify all BIPSS procedures (1990-2013). Electronic medical records were used to identify demographics, laboratory, procedural, surgical and pathologic findings. RESULTS: A total of 331 BIPSS procedures were performed in 327 patients (254 F, 73 M), mean age 41 (range 7-81) years. The overall technical success rate was 88% for bilateral cannulation, though nearly two-thirds of the technical failures had unilateral sampling that diagnosed CD. Of the 331 BIPSS procedures, 40 were performed without, and 291 with stimulation by Acthrel or desmopressin. Sensitivity was 89-94% for unstimulated BIPSS, 96% for stimulated BIPSS, and 77% for MRI. BIPSS lateralization was accurate in about half of patients, compared with 75% accuracy for MRI. Mean inferior petrosal sinus (IPS):peripheral adrenocorticotropic hormone ratio was 17.3 (SE 1.8) at baseline, and 99.2 (SE 14.8) at 3 min, with decreasing values over time. All patients with follow-up after surgical resection for centralizing BIPSS were reported to be cured, with cortisol levels significantly decreased from 19 to 4 µg/dL (p<0.0001). Complications from BIPSS were rare, including groin hematoma (2.5%), but no thromboembolic complications were seen. CONCLUSIONS: BIPSS remains the 'gold standard' for diagnosing CD. Stimulation with Acthrel or desmopressin is key to increasing specificity. When only one IPS can be successfully cannulated, results may still be diagnostic. BIPSS findings cannot be used to accurately lateralize lesions within the pituitary.