RESUMO
The increasing complexity of web applications and systems, driven by ongoing digitalization, has made software security testing a necessary and critical activity in the software development lifecycle. This article compares the performance of open-source tools for conducting static code analysis for security purposes. Eleven different tools were evaluated in this study, scanning 16 vulnerable web applications. The selected vulnerable web applications were chosen for having the best possible documentation regarding their security vulnerabilities for obtaining reliable results. In reality, the static code analysis tools used in this paper can also be applied to other types of applications, such as embedded systems. Based on the results obtained and the conducted analysis, recommendations for the use of these types of solutions were proposed, to achieve the best possible results. The analysis of the tested tools revealed that there is no perfect tool. For example, Semgrep performed better considering applications developed using JavaScript technology but had worse results regarding applications developed using PHP technology.
RESUMO
COVID-19 forced a number of changes in many areas of life, which resulted in an increase in human activity in cyberspace. Furthermore, the number of cyberattacks has increased. In such circumstances, detection, accurate prioritisation, and timely removal of critical vulnerabilities is of key importance for ensuring the security of various organisations. One of the most-commonly used vulnerability assessment standards is the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), which allows for assessing the degree of vulnerability criticality on a scale from 0 to 10. Unfortunately, not all detected vulnerabilities have defined CVSS base scores, or if they do, they are not always expressed using the latest standard (CVSS 3.x). In this work, we propose using machine learning algorithms to convert the CVSS vector from Version 2.0 to 3.x. We discuss in detail the individual steps of the conversion procedure, starting from data acquisition using vulnerability databases and Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithms, to the vector mapping process based on the optimisation of ML algorithm parameters, and finally, the application of machine learning to calculate the CVSS 3.x vector components. The calculated example results showed the effectiveness of the proposed method for the conversion of the CVSS 2.0 vector to the CVSS 3.x standard.
