The simplest method to classify CAM lesions.

CAM lesions are now seen as a significant pathology that could cause osteoarthritis of the hip joint. Currently there is no gold standard for classifying these lesions. We aim to show a simple method for classifying these lesions based on shape and position. Using CT 3D reconstruction, 91 preoperative CT scans from patients who had undergone hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, were reconstructed to produce 3D images. Two senior hip surgeons have devised a simple four type classification system from previous experience. The system highlights the position and shape of different CAM lesions present in patients. The two senior surgeons and one junior surgeon reviewed the scans individually to assess whether the system could be used at all levels of surgical experience. The two senior surgeons agreed on which type of CAM lesion was present in all 91 cases. Intra observer reliability scores for the senior surgeons were 0.90 and 0.91. The junior surgeon reviewed the scans and disagreed on eight cases. This gave a Kappa co-efficient score of 0.87, which confirms a reliable system. We believe this classification system is simple and reproducible. It will aid surgeons in pre and intra-operative management of CAM lesions. Surgeons will be able to select the optimal portal placement and resect less capsule depending on the exact CAM lesion identified. This will potentially reduce complications and improve outcomes in junior hip arthroscopy surgeons.

Improving the care of patients with a hip fracture: a quality improvement report.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality and their incidence is set to increase. The National Hip Fracture Database and the Best Practice Tariff were introduced with the aim of improving patient care. This complete audit cycle charts the substantial clinical improvements that were achieved in a busy district general hospital. METHODS: The first audit cycle comprised 379 patients who were admitted between May 2012 and April 2013. The primary audit criterion was operative intervention within 36 h of admission. Variation according to the day of the week of admission was assessed to evaluate specific deficiencies in local service provision. The principle audit intervention was the introduction of two additional morning trauma lists. A re-audit of 162 patients was conducted prospectively between January 2014 and June 2014. RESULTS: Mean time to theatre was 49±39 h during the first audit cycle compared with 27±19 h (p<0.0001) during the second. Consequently, the proportion of patients undergoing operative intervention within 36 h of admission improved from 41% to 78% (p<0.0001). Overall achievement of Best Practice Tariff was significantly higher during the second cycle: 28% vs 73% (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in the quality of hip fracture care were achieved following this audit. These were accomplished by rigorously analysing the variation in Best Practice Tariff achievement according to the day of the week on which patients were admitted. Targeted interventions could therefore be introduced that addressed specific problems in local service provision.

Results of the learning curve for interventional hip arthroscopy: a prospective study.

This prospective study aims to explore hip arthroscopy, outcome and the effect of the learning curve. Using the non-arthritic hip score preoperatively and postoperatively in 120 patients with an average 23-month follow-up, a median improvement of 16 points was seen at 6 months (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon's signed ranks) remaining at 2 years (15, p < 0.05). Dividing patients into consecutive chronological groups of 40, the learning curve was explored. At six-months scores improved by 12 (p < 0.05) in first 40, 15 (p < 0.0001) in second and 20 (p < 0.0001) in third. A reduction in THR (22.5%, 5%, 2.5%) and revision rates (10%, 7.5%, 0) was seen. An increase in cumulative percentage satisfaction (defined as minimum 10 points increase) was seen from 20th (45%) to 100th procedure (65%). Results significantly improve as experience increases, possibly due to improved surgical skill, preoperative workup or improved understanding of operative indications.

The presentation of rickets to orthopaedic clinics: return of the English disease.

Rickets is a potentially treatable disease of the bone that is most commonly due to deficiency of vitamin D and is increasing in incidence in developed countries. Risk factors include dietary factors, the practice of covering up and darker skin pigmentation. This small retrospective case study set out to examine all cases of rickets presenting to the Paediatric Orthopaedic clinic over a 15-month period. Rickets presented in a bimodal fashion in the 6 cases identified: in males and females aged 3 or less and female adolescents aged 10 and above. This is in keeping with what is known regarding the rapid phases of growth during development. Five cases were from ethnic minority groups. Both female adolescents presented with genu valgum. Rickets can present primarily to Orthopaedic clinics with vague musculoskeletal symptoms. We recommend that biochemical screening be performed on patients from ethnic minorities who may be 'at risk'.