Unraveling quad fever: Severe hyperthermia after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: There are many infectious and inflammatory causes for elevated core-body temperatures, though they rarely pass 40 â„ƒ (104 ℉). The term "quad fever" is used for extreme hyperpyrexia in the setting of acute cervical spinal cord injuries (SCIs). The traditional methods of treating hyperpyrexia are often ineffective and reported morbidity and mortality rates approach 100%. This study aims to identify the incidence of elevated temperatures in SCIs at our institution and assess the effectiveness of using a non-invasive dry water temperature management system as a treatment modality with mortality. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of acute SCI patients requiring surgical intensive care unit admission who experienced fevers ≥ 40 â„ƒ (104 ℉) were compared to patients with maximum temperatures < 40 â„ƒ. Patients ≥18 years old who sustained an acute traumatic SCI were included in this study. Patients who expired in the emergency department; had a SCI without radiologic abnormality; had neuropraxia; were admitted to any location other than the surgical intensive care unit; or had positive blood cultures were excluded. SAS 9.4 was used to conduct statistical analysis. RESULTS: Over the 9-year study period, 35 patients were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit with a verified SCI. Seven patients experienced maximum temperatures of ≥ 40 â„ƒ. Six of those patients were treated with the dry water temperature management system with an overall mortality of 57.1% in this subgroup. The mortality rate for the 28 patients who experienced a maximum temperature of ≤ 40 â„ƒ was 21.4% (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of quad fever should be considered in patients with cervical SCI in the presence of hyperthermia. In this study, there was no significant difference in mortality between quad fever patients treated with a dry water temperature management system versus SCI patients without quad fever. The early use of a dry water temperature management system appears to decrease the mortality rate of quad fever.

Management and Outcomes of Isolated Axillary Artery Injury: A Five-Year National Trauma Data Bank Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate recent national trends in the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with isolated axillary artery injuries. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried to identify records submitted from 2011 to 2015 that contained an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for an injury to axillary artery (903.01) and an external cause of injury code indicating blunt or penetrating trauma. Records that contained a diagnosis code for an injury to an additional blood vessel (900.00-903.00, 903.2-904.9), an injury to a nonupper extremity or unclassifiable body region, or whose operative management could not be discerned were excluded. The final study sample included 221 patients with isolated axillary artery injury. The patient's clinical management was the primary outcome of interest. The study sample was stratified by trauma type, and descriptive statistics were performed on all variables. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of patients received operative management. Patients with penetrating injury were 24% more likely to be managed operatively than bluntly injured patients (76.9% vs. 62.1%, P = 0.0178). In operatively managed patients, the open repair rate was 82.8% and endovascular repair rate was 10.2%. Graft repair was performed most often (28.0%), followed by placement of a temporary intravenous shunt (17.8%) and surgical occlusion (10.2%). Surgical vessel occlusion was significantly more likely to be performed on patients with penetrating injury than with blunt injury (14.6% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.0124). Patients with penetrating injury had significantly shorter median emergency department length of stay (87.0 min vs. 152.0 min, P < 0.0001), intensive care unit length of stay (2.0 days vs. 3.0 days, P < 0.0388), hospital length of stay (4.0 days vs. 5.0 days, P = 0.0026), and time-to-operative management (1.6 hr vs. 3.9 hr, P < 0.001) compared to bluntly injured patients. Patients with blunt injury had a higher reportable in-hospital complication rate (13.8% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.0477). The overall mortality rate was 3.1% for isolated axillary artery injuries and did not significantly differ by trauma type. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary artery injury is more often caused by penetrating trauma. Despite introduction of novel endovascular techniques, the majority of patients with isolated axillary artery injury are managed using open repair. Penetrating axillary artery injury is significantly more likely to be managed using open repair and by surgical occlusion. Patients with blunt injury have higher complication rates and longer hospital length of stays. The mortality rate is lower than previously published.

The Impact of an ICU "Bed Ahead" Policy on ED Length of Stay and Patient Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of preassigning a single bed in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) for the next trauma admission. BACKGROUND: Prolonged emergency department (ED) dwell time before admission to a critical care unit has an adverse effect on patient outcomes and is often due to the lack of an available bed in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A "Bed Ahead" policy was instituted at an urban level 1 Trauma Public Safety Net Teaching Hospital to preassign 1 SICU bed for the next trauma patient who warrants a critical care admission. A retrospective review of all trauma patients admitted to the SICU before and after implementation of this policy was performed to assess the impact on ED dwell time, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, complications, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: ED length of stay (ED-LOS); ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS); hospital length of stay (HLOS); complications; and in-hospital mortality were compared before (PRE) and after (POST)implementation of the Bed Ahead policy. Statistically significant improvements were seen in the POST period for ED-LOS, HLOS, complications, and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Preassigning 1 ICU for the yet to arrive next injured patient decreases ED dwell times, complications, HLOS, and in-hospital mortality.

Betwixt and between: a surgical post-acute treatment unit (SPA) for the optimal care of elderly patients with isolated hip fractures.

BACKGROUND: A performance improved project identified elderly trauma patients to have a disproportionate incidence of complications. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a small specialty care unit to decrease complications in patients who no longer warrant care in an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A surgical post-acute treatment unit (SPA) was developed with focused attention to cognition, nutrition, respiration, and mobilization needs of patients who no longer had physiologic need for an intensive care unit environment, but were still in need of increased attention at the bedside. RESULTS: While ICU and hospital lengths of stay were unchanged, patients placed in the SPA experienced less complications and required less unplanned ICU re-admissions. DISCUSSION: Geriatric patients, especially the elderly, are not simply old adults. They have unique needs as a consequence of the aging process, which can be encompassed by four pillars of intercession: cognition, nutrition, respiration, and mobilization. CONCLUSIONS: By adapting a physical environment supported by bedside attention to address the interwoven needs of geriatric and elderly patients who no longer care in an ICU, complications and unplanned return admissions to the ICU can be decreased. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Improved outcomes following implementation of a multidisciplinary care pathway for elderly hip fractures.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures in patients 65 years and older are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. With the steady increase in the elderly population, we implemented an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the management of hip fractures to optimize patient care and surgical outcomes. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of a multidisciplinary hip fracture care pathway on patient outcomes in the care of elderly patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the differences in outcomes prior to (January-October 2014) and after (November 2014-April 2016) implementation of a hip fracture care pathway at a regional Level I trauma center was performed. RESULTS: There were 80 patients in the pre-pathway group and 191 patients in the post-pathway group with an average age of 83.18 ± 8.24 years. The analysis demonstrated that the post-pathway group had a lower incidence of in-hospital complications (9.95 vs 30.00%; p ≤ 0.001), shorter emergency room length of stay (3.76 ± 2.43 vs 6.78 ± 2.88 h; p ≤ 0.0001), and shorter overall hospital length of stay (5.03 ± 3.46 vs 7.44 ± 6.66 days; p = 0.0028). The in-hospital mortality rate was similar between groups (4.71 vs 6.25%; p = 0.6018). DISCUSSION: The development of a multidisciplinary approach to the care of elderly patients with hip fractures improved morbidity and showed a downward trend in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with hip fractures treated at our trauma center had improved clinical outcomes after the implementation of a multidisciplinary care pathway.

The cervical spine can be cleared without MRI after blunt trauma:A retrospective review of a single level 1 trauma center experience over 8 years.

BACKGROUND: The newest CT scanners provide resolution comparable to MRIs leading many to question when and whether cervical spine MRIs are warranted. METHODS: An 8 year retrospective review identified 241 patients who underwent CT scan and MRI of the cervical spine. The initial clinical examination, cervical spine CT scan, and cervical spine MRI were compared to identify cervical spine injuries that would have been missed had the MRI not been performed. RESULTS: The CT scans were normal in 153 patients, and abnormal in 88. Of the 88 abnormal CT scans, the MRIs were abnormal in 65, and normal in the other 23. The indications for MRI in patients with normal CT scans were neck pain, an abnormal neurologic examination, and/or altered mental status. Of the 13 patients with abnormal MRIs, none were pain free with a normal clinical examination. CONCLUSION: In the absence of focal signs of neurologic injury, the cervical spine can be cleared without a clinical exam or MRI if the cervical CT scan does not demonstrate injury or abnormality.