Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27690064

RESUMO

The United Nations "25 × 25 Strategy" of decreasing non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer and chronic respiratory diseases, by 25% by 2025 does not appear to take into account all causes of NCDs. Its focus is on a few diseases, which are often linked with life-style factors with "voluntary" "modifiable behavioral risk factors" causes tending towards an over-simplification of the issues. We propose to add some aspects of our built environment related to hazardous building materials, and detailed form of the construction of infrastructure and buildings, which we think are some of the missing causes of NCDs. Some of these could be termed "involuntary causes", as they relate to factors that are beyond the control of the general public.

2.
J Public Health Policy ; 33(1): 89-104, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22012068

RESUMO

Experience shows that regulatory intervention can lead to substantial improvement in population health. The history of regulatory intervention in public health suggests that 'tipping points' necessary to catalyse regulatory change may be identified. We examine three areas in which governments have legislated to protect public health: sanitation, building standards, and vehicle emissions. We apply the lessons to regulatory reform addressing obesity and the chronic disease it causes.


Assuntos
Códigos de Obras/história , Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Saúde Pública/história , Saneamento/história , Emissões de Veículos , Códigos de Obras/legislação & jurisprudência , História do Século XV , História do Século XVII , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Saneamento/legislação & jurisprudência
3.
Am J Public Health ; 101(12): 2222-5, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22021286

RESUMO

Increased use of fluorescent lighting as a climate change mitigation strategy may increase eye disease. The safe range of light to avoid exposing the eye to potentially damaging ultraviolet (UV) radiation is 2000 to 3500K and greater than 500 nanometers. Some fluorescent lights fall outside this safe range. Fluorescent lighting may increase UV-related eye diseases by up to 12% and, according to our calculations, may cause an additional 3000 cases of cataracts and 7500 cases of pterygia annually in Australia. Greater control of UV exposure from fluorescent lights is required. This may be of particular concern for aging populations in developed countries and countries in northern latitudes where there is a greater dependence on artificial lighting.


Assuntos
Conservação de Recursos Energéticos , Oftalmopatias/etiologia , Olho/efeitos da radiação , Iluminação/efeitos adversos , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Austrália , Catarata/etiologia , Humanos , Pterígio/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...