Drug Transporters and Na+/H+ Exchange Regulatory Factor PSD-95/Drosophila Discs Large/ZO-1 Proteins.

Drug transporters govern the absorption, distribution, and elimination of pharmacologically active compounds. Members of the solute carrier and ATP binding-cassette drug transporter family mediate cellular drug uptake and efflux processes, thereby coordinating the vectorial movement of drugs across epithelial barriers. To exert their physiologic and pharmacological function in polarized epithelia, drug transporters must be targeted and stabilized to appropriate regions of the cell membrane (i.e., apical versus basolateral). Despite the critical importance of drug transporter membrane targeting, the mechanisms that underlie these processes are largely unknown. Several clinically significant drug transporters possess a recognition sequence that binds to PSD-95/Drosophila discs large/ZO-1 (PDZ) proteins. PDZ proteins, such as the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger regulatory factor (NHERF) family, act to stabilize and organize membrane targeting of multiple transmembrane proteins, including many clinically relevant drug transporters. These PDZ proteins are normally abundant at apical membranes, where they tether membrane-delimited transporters. NHERF expression is particularly high at the apical membrane in polarized tissue such as intestinal, hepatic, and renal epithelia, tissues important to drug disposition. Several recent studies have highlighted NHERF proteins as determinants of drug transporter function secondary to their role in controlling membrane abundance and localization. Mounting evidence strongly suggests that NHERF proteins may have clinically significant roles in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of several pharmacologically active compounds and may affect drug action in cancer and chronic kidney disease. For these reasons, NHERF proteins represent a novel class of post-translational mediators of drug transport and novel targets for new drug development.

Antitumor mechanisms of systemically administered epidermal growth factor receptor antisense oligonucleotides in combination with docetaxel in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, with low 5-year survival rates. Current strategies that block epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have limited effects when administered as single agents. Targeting EGFR via intratumoral administration of phosphorothioate-modified antisense oligonucleotides has antitumor efficacy in xenograft models of SCCHN. Because intratumoral delivery of therapeutic agents has limited clinical application, the present study was undertaken to examine the therapeutic mechanisms of systemically delivered phosphorothioate-modified EGFR antisense oligonucleotides alone, or in combination with docetaxel, in a SCCHN xenograft model. EGFR antisense oligonucleotides were administered at 5 mg/kg i.p. daily in athymic mice bearing 1483 human SCCHN xenografts alone or in combination with docetaxel at 2.5 mg/kg i.p. once a week for 4 weeks. Administration of EGFR antisense oligonucleotides in combination with docetaxel improved antitumor efficacy and resulted in lower expression levels of EGFR, fewer proliferating cells, and more apoptotic cells in the tumors compared with controls. Systemic administration of phosphorothioated EGFR antisense oligonucleotides for 30 days increased the retention of docetaxel in the tumor by approximately 4-fold compared with tumors treated with docetaxel alone or docetaxel and EGFR sense oligonucleotides (P < 0.05). Combination of EGFR antisense oligonucleotides with low doses of docetaxel has antitumor efficacy, and it may be an effective treatment strategy for SCCHN.

Plasma, tumor, and tissue disposition of STEALTH liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602) and nonliposomal CKD-602 in mice bearing A375 human melanoma xenografts.

PURPOSE: S-CKD602 is a STEALTH liposomal formulation of CKD-602, a camptothecin analogue. The cytotoxicity of camptothecin analogues is related to the duration of exposure in the tumor. STEALTH liposomal formulations contain lipid conjugated to methoxypolyethylene glycol and have been designed to prolong drug circulation time, increase tumor delivery, and improve the therapeutic index. For STEALTH liposomal formulations of anticancer agents to achieve antitumor effects, the active drug must be released into the tumor extracellular fluid (ECF). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: S-CKD602 at 1 mg/kg or nonliposomal CKD-602 at 30 mg/kg was administered once via tail vein to mice bearing A375 human melanoma xenografts. Mice (n = 3 per time point) were euthanized at 0.083 to 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after S-CKD02 and from 0.083 to 24 h after nonliposomal CKD-602. Plasma samples were processed to measure encapsulated, released, and sum total (encapsulated plus released) CKD-602, and tumor and tissue samples were processed to measure sum total CKD-602. Microdialysis samples of tumor ECF were obtained from 0 to 2 h, 4 to 7 h, and 20 to 24 h after nonliposomal CKD-602 and from 0 to 2 h, 24 to 27 h, 48 to 51 h, and 72 to 75 h after S-CKD602. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay was used to measure the total (sum of lactone and hydroxyl acid) CKD-602. The area under the concentration-versus-time curves (AUC) from 0 to infinity and time >1 ng/mL in tumor were estimated. RESULTS: For S-CKD602, the CKD-602 sum total AUC in plasma and tumor and the CKD-602 AUC in tumor ECF were 201,929, 13,194, and 187 ng/mL h, respectively. For S-CKD602, 82% of CKD-602 remains encapsulated in plasma. For nonliposomal CKD-602, the CKD-602 AUC in plasma and tumor and the CKD-602 AUC in tumor ECF were 9,117, 11,661, and 639 ng/mL.h, respectively. The duration of time the CKD-602 concentration was >1 ng/mL in tumor ECF after S-CKD602 and nonliposomal CKD-602 was >72 and approximately 20 h, respectively. For S-CKD602, the CKD-602 sum total exposure was 1.3-fold higher in fat as compared with muscle. The ratio of CKD-602 sum total exposure in fat to muscle was 3.8-fold higher after administration of S-CKD602 compared with nonliposomal CKD-602. CONCLUSION: S-CKD602 provides pharmacokinetic advantages in plasma, tumor, and tumor ECF compared with nonliposomal CKD-602 at 1/30th of the dose, which is consistent with the improved antitumor efficacy of S-CKD602 in preclinical studies. The distribution of S-CKD602 is greater in fat compared with muscle whereas the distribution of nonliposomal CKD-602 is greater in muscle compared with fat. These results suggest that the body composition of a patient may affect the disposition of S-CKD602 and released CKD-602.