Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 105(7-8): 273-280, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368176

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capabilities of photon-counting (PC) CT combined with artificial intelligence-derived coronary computed tomography angiography (PC-CCTA) stenosis quantification and fractional flow reserve prediction (FFRai) for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) work-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis referred for pre-TAVR work-up between October 2021 and June 2023 were included in this retrospective tertiary single-center study. All patients underwent both PC-CCTA and ICA within three months for reference standard diagnosis. PC-CCTA stenosis quantification (at 50% level) and FFRai (at 0.8 level) were predicted using two deep learning models (CorEx, Spimed-AI). Diagnostic performance for global CAD evaluation (at least one significant stenosis ≥ 50% or FFRai ≤ 0.8) was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients (138 men, 122 women) with a mean age of 78.7 ± 8.1 (standard deviation) years (age range: 51-93 years) were evaluated. Significant CAD on ICA was present in 126/260 patients (48.5%). Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 96.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.0-98.7), 68.7% (95% CI: 60.1-76.4), 74.3 % (95% CI: 69.1-78.8), 94.8% (95% CI: 88.5-97.8), and 81.9% (95% CI: 76.7-86.4) for PC-CCTA, and 96.8% (95% CI: 92.1-99.1), 87.3% (95% CI: 80.5-92.4), 87.8% (95% CI: 82.2-91.8), 96.7% (95% CI: 91.7-98.7), and 91.9% (95% CI: 87.9-94.9) for FFRai. Area under the curve of FFRai was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) compared to 0.82 for PC-CCTA (95% CI: 0.77-0.87) (P < 0.001). FFRai-guidance could have prevented the need for ICA in 121 out of 260 patients (46.5%) vs. 97 out of 260 (37.3%) using PC-CCTA alone (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Deep learning-based photon-counting FFRai evaluation improves the accuracy of PC-CCTA ≥ 50% stenosis detection, reduces the need for ICA, and may be incorporated into the clinical TAVR work-up for the assessment of CAD.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Inteligência Artificial , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico/fisiologia , Angiografia Coronária/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...