Paperless reporting and electronically verifying clinical investigations.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to outline considerations and steps taken to introduce electronic reporting and verification from systems design and multidisciplinary collaborations to gap analysis and devising solutions. It also evaluates carefully placed forcing functions' impact on verification rates. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A multidisciplinary workgroup was formed to stop print and establish electronic reporting. The electronic verification's success was assessed by weekly activity analysis. FINDINGS: Introducing a verification forcing function markedly improved verification activity. Thereafter, non-verified results stabilized at 7 percent up to 75 weeks post-implementation. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This paper illustrates how results reporting and verification could be implemented in a tertiary hospital using a mixed electronic and paper record. Factors that were critical to success include stakeholder engagement and applying systems design that focussed on patient safety as a key priority. The electronic reporting system was augmented by strategically inserted forcing functions, clear clinical-responsibility lines and ancillary alert systems. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The systems design method's value in managing non-critical but abnormal results appears to have been under-appreciated. This paper describes how systems design could be used to improve health information delivery and management.

Comprehensive noninvasive evaluation of bypass grafts and native coronary arteries in patients after coronary bypass surgery: accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography compared to invasive coronary angiography.

AIMS: We assessed the accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) compared with that of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the evaluation of symptomatic postcoronary artery bypass graft (post-CABG) patients. METHODS: MDCT and ICA were performed in 44 consecutive post-CABG patients with chest pain (mean age 66 +/- 10 years, mean duration post-CABG 9 +/- 5 years). MDCT findings were compared with the corresponding ICA, which was read by an interventional cardiologist blinded to the MDCT findings. Significant stenosis was defined as at least 50% luminal stenosis. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven grafts (31 arterial and 106 venous), all evaluable by MDCT, were assessed. In a 'per graft' analysis, MDCT could detect significant disease in bypass grafts (graft occlusion or stenosis) with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 98%. In a 'per segment' analysis, MDCT could detect significant disease in all native coronary arteries with a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 79% and in clinically relevant native coronary arteries with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 84%. In a 'per vessel' analysis, MDCT could differentiate native arterial occlusion from nonocclusive stenosis with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 70%. In a 'per patient' analysis, MDCT could detect significant disease in bypass grafts or clinically relevant native coronary arteries with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 40% and accuracy of 93%. CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-slice MDCT allows evaluation of bypass grafts and native coronary arteries in post-CABG patients. Although accurate for detecting bypass graft disease, 64-slice MDCT has significant limitations when evaluating native arteries in post-CABG patients.