Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gene Med ; 26(6): e3694, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847309

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint blockade has emerged as a key strategy to the therapy landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, notable differences in immunotherapeutic outcomes exist between the two primary NSCLC subtypes: lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). This disparity may stem from the tumor immune microenvironment's heterogeneity at the transcriptome level. METHODS: By integrative analysis of transcriptomic characterization of 38 NSCLC patients by single-cell RNA sequencing, the present study revealed a distinct tumor microenvironment (TME) between LUAD and LUSC, with relevant results further confirmed in bulk transcriptomic and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) validation cohort of neoadjuvant immunotherapy patients. RESULTS: LUAD exhibited a more active immune microenvironment compared to LUSC. This included highly expression of HLA I/II in cancer cells, reinforced antigen presentation potential of dendritic cells and enhanced cytotoxic activity observed in T/NK cells. In LUSC, cancer cells highly expressed genes belonging to the aldo-keto reductases, glutathione S-transferases and aldehyde dehydrogenase family, negatively correlating with immunotherapy outcomes in the validation cohort of our center. Further analysis revealed elevated infiltrated cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in LUSC, which was corroborated in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. Corresponding increased infiltration of ADH1B+ CAFs in major pathologic response (MPR) patients and the higher presence of FAP+ CAFs in non-MPR patients were demonstrated by multiplex mIF. Moreover, upregulating immunosuppressive extracellular matrix remodeling was identified in LUSC. CONCLUSIONS: These comprehensive analyses advance the understanding of the differences in TME between LUAD and LUSC, offering insights for patient selection and developing subtype-specific treatment strategies.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Imunoterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Análise de Célula Única , Transcriptoma , Microambiente Tumoral , Humanos , Microambiente Tumoral/imunologia , Microambiente Tumoral/genética , Análise de Célula Única/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/imunologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Imunoterapia/métodos , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/genética , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/imunologia , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/patologia , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/imunologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Masculino , Feminino , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/imunologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 2024 Jan 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242341

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) represents an exceptionally aggressive and infrequent variant within the realm of non-small cell lung cancer, necessitating surgical intervention as the primary therapeutic approach. However, the postoperative management strategy for early-stage patients continues to be a subject of intense debate and uncertainty. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients diagnosed with LCNEC who underwent surgical resection at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between July 2018 and June 2022. Comprehensive assessments, encompassing univariate and multivariate analyses, were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of these indicators in patient clinical profiles, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: A comprehensive screening effort identified 171 patients with LCNEC, with 70 stage I patients meeting the criteria for inclusion in the final cohort. Of these, 11 patients (15.7%) presented with combined LCNEC, and 59 (84.3%) exhibited pure LCNEC. Univariate and multivariate analyses both unveiled that spread through air spaces (STAS) status emerged as an independent prognostic determinant for both DFS (P = .003) and OS (P = .013), whereas histologic subtype independently predicted OS (P = .011). Subgroup survival analyses further underscored that the advantageous effects of postoperative chemotherapy were significantly pronounced exclusively among STAS-positive patients, showcasing a statistically significant enhancement in DFS (P = .047) and OS (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: STAS may serve as an adverse prognostic factor in stage I LCNEC patients, potentially offering guidance for postoperative chemotherapy decisions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...