Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Palliat Med ; 9(5): 3235-3248, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32954754

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neither a vaccine nor specific therapeutic drugs against 2019 novel coronavirus have been developed. Some studies have shown that Xuebijing injection (XBJ) can exert an anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting the production of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and other cytokines. This study aimed to investigate the effect of XBJ on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its effects on IL-6 and tumor necrosis alpha TNF-α. METHODS: A total of 42 patients, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and treated with XBJ combined with routine treatment at Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital between January 20, 2020, and March 11, 2020, were selected as the observation group. A control group comprising 16 patients who received routine treatment was also established, and cases were matched from the observation group on a 1:1 basis according to age, comorbidities, and mild and severe disease. The clinical symptoms, laboratory test indexes, and changes in computed tomography (CT) scans of patients in the two groups were observed at the time of admission and 7 days after treatment, and the time taken for the patients to produce a negative nucleic acid test was also recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups. After treatment, there were significant improvements in IL-6 levels and body temperature in the observation group as compared with the control group. Particularly in severe patients, the reduction in body temperature in the observation group was greater than that in the control group (P<0.05). A higher number of patients in the observation group showed improved CT imaging results compared with the control group, and the time taken to produce a negative nucleic acid test was shorter in the observation group than in the control group; however, the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in TNF-α and IL-10 between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that routine treatment combined with XBJ can better improve the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Febre/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Interleucina-10/imunologia , Interleucina-6/imunologia , Tempo de Internação , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , Respiração Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/imunologia , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
2.
Br J Haematol ; 189(3): 428-437, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32297671

RESUMO

We explored the relationships between lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, pulmonary inflammation index (PII) and disease evolution in patients with (corona virus disease 2019) COVID-19. A total of 123 patients with COVID-19 were divided into mild and severe groups. Lymphocyte subsets and cytokines were detected on the first day of hospital admission and lung computed tomography results were quantified by PII. Difference analysis and correlation analysis were performed on the two groups. A total of 102 mild and 21 severe patients were included in the analysis. There were significant differences in cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+ T), cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8+ T), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and PII between the two groups. There were significant positive correlations between CD4+ T and CD8+ T, IL-6 and IL-10 in the mild group (r2  = 0·694, r 2  = 0·633, respectively; P < 0·01). After 'five-in-one' treatment, all patients were discharged with the exception of the four who died. Higher survival rates occurred in the mild group and in those with IL-6 within normal values. CD4+ T, CD8+ T, IL-6, IL-10 and PII can be used as indicators of disease evolution, and the PII can be used as an independent indicator for disease progression of COVID-19.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Citocinas/sangue , Pulmão/imunologia , Subpopulações de Linfócitos , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Infecções por Coronavirus/sangue , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Citocinas/imunologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumonia Viral/sangue , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J Med Virol ; 92(7): 797-806, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32198776

RESUMO

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus in China (SARS-CoV-2) that began in December 2019 presents a significant and urgent threat to global health. This study was conducted to provide the international community with a deeper understanding of this new infectious disease. Epidemiological, clinical features, laboratory findings, radiological characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes of 135 patients in northeast Chongqing were collected and analyzed in this study. A total of 135 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. The median age was 47 years (interquartile range, 36-55), and there was no significant gender difference (53.3% men). The majority of patients had contact with people from the Wuhan area. Forty-three (31.9%) patients had underlying disease, primarily hypertension (13 [9.6%]), diabetes (12 [8.9%]), cardiovascular disease (7 [5.2%]), and malignancy (4 [3.0%]). Common symptoms included fever (120 [88.9%]), cough (102 [76.5%]), and fatigue (44 [32.5%]). Chest computed tomography scans showed bilateral patchy shadows or ground glass opacity in the lungs of all the patients. All patients received antiviral therapy (135 [100%]) (Kaletra and interferon were both used), antibacterial therapy (59 [43.7%]), and corticosteroids (36 [26.7%]). In addition, many patients received traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) (124 [91.8%]). It is suggested that patients should receive Kaletra early and should be treated by a combination of Western and Chinese medicines. Compared to the mild cases, the severe ones had lower lymphocyte counts and higher plasma levels of Pt, APTT, d-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, PCT, ALB, C-reactive protein, and aspartate aminotransferase. This study demonstrates the clinic features and therapies of 135 COVID-19 patients. Kaletra and TCM played an important role in the treatment of the viral pneumonia. Further studies are required to explore the role of Kaletra and TCM in the treatment of COVID-19.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações do Diabetes/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Biomarcadores/sangue , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/patologia , China , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/patologia , Tosse/diagnóstico , Tosse/fisiopatologia , Tosse/virologia , Complicações do Diabetes/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/patologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/uso terapêutico , Fadiga/diagnóstico , Fadiga/fisiopatologia , Fadiga/virologia , Feminino , Febre/diagnóstico , Febre/fisiopatologia , Febre/virologia , Humanos , Interferons/uso terapêutico , Lopinavir/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/patologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
4.
Iran J Public Health ; 49(Suppl 1): 82-86, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34268209

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19(2019 novel coronavirus disease)has brought tremendous pressure to the prevention and control of the national epidemic due to its concealed onset, strong infectivity and fast transmission speed. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 226 patients diagnosed with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) in the Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital were included. The patients' clinical data, including general information, initial symptoms at the onset, time of disease diagnosis, time to treatment in hospital, time of nucleic acid conversion to negative, disease classification, total time of hospitalization were collected. The clinical data of the mild and severe patients were compared. RESULTS: Fever, cough, sore throat, poor appetite andfatigue were the main symptoms of the diagnosed patients. The time of diagnosis was significantly shorter in the mild patients (4.96 ± 4.10 days) than severe patients (7.63 ± 9.17 days) (P=0.004). Mild patients had shorter time to treatment in hospital (6.09 ± 4.47 vs. 8.71 ± 9.04 days) and less time of nucleic acid conversion to negative (7.58 ± 2.51 vs. 11.6 ± 4.67 days) compared to the severe patients. CONCLUSION: The above results can be used as a quantitative basis for the "five-early"(early detection, early screening, early diagnosis, early isolation treatment, and early recovery) model. The government, the masses, and the hospitals' joint prevention and optimization of the "five-early" model will provide important scientific reference for further prevention and control of the epidemics.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...