Point mutation in essential genes with loss or mutation of the second allele: relevance to the retention of tumor-specific antigens.

Antigens that are tumor specific yet retained by tumor cells despite tumor progression offer stable and specific targets for immunologic and possibly other therapeutic interventions. Therefore, we have studied two CD4(+) T cell-recognized tumor-specific antigens that were retained during evolution of two ultraviolet-light-induced murine cancers to more aggressive growth. The antigens are ribosomal proteins altered by somatic tumor-specific point mutations, and the progressor (PRO) variants lack the corresponding normal alleles. In the first tumor, 6132A-PRO, the antigen is encoded by a point-mutated L9 ribosomal protein gene. The tumor lacks the normal L9 allele because of an interstitial deletion from chromosome 5. In the second tumor, 6139B-PRO, both alleles of the L26 gene have point mutations, and each encodes a different tumor-specific CD4(+) T cell-recognized antigen. Thus, for both L9 and L26 genes, we observe "two hit" kinetics commonly observed in genes suppressing tumor growth. Indeed, reintroduction of the lost wild-type L9 allele into the 6132A-PRO variant suppressed the growth of the tumor cells in vivo. Since both L9 and L26 encode proteins essential for ribosomal biogenesis, complete loss of the tumor-specific target antigens in the absence of a normal allele would abrogate tumor growth.

CD4(+) T cells eliminate MHC class II-negative cancer cells in vivo by indirect effects of IFN-gamma.

CD4(+) T cells can eliminate tumor cells in vivo in the absence of CD8(+) T cells. We have CD4(+) T cells specific for a MHC class II-restricted, tumor-specific peptide derived from a mutant ribosomal protein expressed by the UV light-induced tumor 6132A-PRO. By using neutralizing mAb specific for murine IFN-gamma and adoptive transfer of CD4(+) T cells into severe combined immunodeficient mice, we show that anti-IFN-gamma treatment abolishes the CD4(+) T cell-mediated rejection of the tumor cells in vivo. The tumor cells were MHC class II negative, and IFN-gamma did not induce MHC class II expression in vitro. Therefore, the tumor-specific antigenic peptide must be presented by host cells and not the tumor cells. Tumor cells transduced to secrete IFN-gamma had a markedly reduced growth rate in severe combined immunodeficient mice, but IFN-gamma did not inhibit the growth of the tumor cells in vitro. Furthermore, tumor cells stably expressing a dominant-negative truncated form of the murine IFN-gamma receptor alpha chain, and therefore insensitive to IFN-gamma, nevertheless were rejected by the adoptively transferred CD4(+) T cells. Thus, host cells, and not tumor cells, seem to be the target of IFN-gamma. Together, these results show that CD4(+) T cells can eliminate IFN-gamma-insensitive, MHC class II-negative cancer cells by an indirect mechanism that depends on IFN-gamma.