Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 87(10): 837-841, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28768366

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ureteric stents are indispensable tools in modern urology; however, the risk of them not being followed-up once inserted poses medical and medico-legal risks. Stent registers are a common solution to mitigate this risk; however, manual registers are logistically challenging, especially for busy units. METHODS: Western Sydney Local Health District developed a novel Semi-Automatic Electronic Stent Register (SAESR) utilizing billing information to track stent insertions. To determine the utility of this system, an audit was conducted comparing the 6 months before the introduction of the register to the first 6 months of the register. RESULTS: In the first 6 months of the register, 457 stents were inserted. At the time of writing, two of these are severely delayed for removal, representing a rate of 0.4%. In the 6 months immediately preceding the introduction of the register, 497 stents were inserted, and six were either missed completely or severely delayed in their removal, representing a rate of 1.2%. A non-inferiority analysis found this to be no worse than the results achieved before the introduction of the register. CONCLUSION: The SAESR allowed us to improve upon our better than expected rate of stents lost to follow up or severely delayed. We demonstrated non-inferiority in the rate of lost or severely delayed stents, and a number of other advantages including savings in personnel costs. The semi-automatic register represents an effective way of reducing the risk associated with a common urological procedure. We believe that this methodology could be implemented elsewhere.


Assuntos
Perda de Seguimento , Auditoria Médica/economia , Stents/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/instrumentação , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Auditoria Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Gestão de Riscos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Ureter/cirurgia , Doenças Ureterais/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2016(5)2016 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27165751

RESUMO

Epididymo-orchitis is a common diagnosis in men presenting with unilateral testicular pain. It can be of an infectious or non-infectious aetiology. Clinical examination and laboratory investigations do not reliably differentiate testicular infarction secondary to epididymo-orchitis from uncomplicated epididymo-orchitis. Definitive diagnosis is usually made by ultrasound. Misdiagnosis and under-treatment can lead to poor outcome, such as infarction and loss of the affected testis. We present an uncommon case of epididymo-orchitis resulting in testicular infarction and rupture despite normal initial investigations.

3.
Urology ; 78(6): 1380-4, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21903245

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of stopping anticoagulant medications prior to transurethral resection of the prostate on peri-operative cardiovascular complications. METHODS: Retrospective series (305 patients) undergoing TURP at a tertiary hospital between 2006 and 2010. All men were evaluated in preadmission clinics with defined protocols, with a low threshold for cardiovascular investigation. Incidence of postoperative bleeding and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was determined for 3 patient cohorts: group A--where anticoagulants were ceased preoperatively; group B--who were not receiving any anticoagulants; and group C--who underwent TURP while taking aspirin. RESULTS: Of 305 patients, 194 (64%) did not receive anticoagulation therapy, 108 (35%) stopped receiving anticoagulation therapy pre-TURP, and 3 (0.98%) underwent TURP while taking aspirin. Anticoagulants used were aspirin (22.6%), warfarin (4.9%), antiplatelets (4.9%), and combination treatments (3.9%). Incidence of postoperative hemorrhage (early and delayed) was not significant (P = .69) between group A (10/108) and group B (7/194). Transfusion rate was 0.6% (2/305). Overall incidence of cardiovascular events was 0.98% (group A, n = 1 vs group B, n = 2), and incidence of deep vein thrombosis (0.32%; group A, n = 0 vs group B, n = 1) was not statistically significant (P = .30 and P = .37, respectively). Overall incidence of cerebrovascular events (0.65%; group A, n = 1 vs group B, n = 1) was not significant (P = 1.00). There were no deaths. CONCLUSION: Men who have discontinue anticoagulation therapy before TURP do not appear to have a higher incidence of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, or bleeding-associated morbidity. It is possible that the morbidity attributed to discontinuing anticoagulation in this population may be overemphasized. Larger prospective studies are needed to better evaluate this clinical problem.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Idoso , Angina Pectoris/etiologia , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiologia , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Transfusão de Sangue , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Varfarina/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...