Role of pre-transplant marital status in renal transplant outcome.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease is associated with illness-induced disruptions that challenge patients and their families to accommodate and adapt. However, the impact of patients' marital status on kidney transplant outcome has never been studied. This project, based on data from United States Renal Data System (USRDS), helps to answer how marriage affects renal transplant outcome. METHODS: Data have been collected from USRDS on all kidney/kidney-pancreas allograft recipients between January 1, 1995 and June 30, 2002, who were 18 yr old or older and had information about their marital status prior to the kidney transplantation (n = 2061). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards modeling to control for confounding variables. RESULTS: Overall findings of this study suggest that being married has a significant protective effect on death-censored graft survival [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.80, p < 0.05] but a non-significant effect on recipient survival (HR 0.85, p = 0.122). When stratified by gender, the effect was still present in males for death-censored graft survival (HR 0.75, p < 0.05), but not for recipient survival (HR 0.86, p = 0.24). The effect was not observed in females, where neither graft (HR 0.90, p = 0.55) nor recipient (HR 0.8, p = 0.198) survival had an association with marital status. In subgroup analysis similar association was found in the recipients of a single transplant. CONCLUSION: Based on our analysis, being married in the pre-transplant period is associated with positive outcome for the graft, but not for the recipient survival. When analyzed separately, the effect is present in male, but not in female recipients.

A population-based assessment of the familial component of chronic kidney disease mortality.

BACKGROUND/AIM: While the familial nature of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been recognized, it has primarily been defined from studies of first-degree relatives of selected sets of cases. The goal of this study is an evaluation of the familial clustering of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and CKD mortality using a population-based genealogy of Utah. This is the first population-based analysis of the familial component of ESRD and non-ESRD CKD. METHODS: We have defined two distinct patient groups for this analysis, using individuals with death certificates in the Utah Population Database indicating ESRD (n = 192) and non-ESRD CKD (n = 335) as the cause of death. Two measures of familiality were used: (1) relative risk (RR) of CKD or ESRD death in relatives of cases and (2) an average relatedness statistic, i.e., the Genealogical Index of Familiality. RESULTS: The RR for dying with ESRD among the first-degree relatives of individuals dying with ESRD is estimated to be 10.1 (p = 0.0007, 95% confidence interval CI 2.76-25.95), but is not significantly elevated among second-degree relatives. The RR for dying with non-ESRD CKD among first- and second-degree relatives of individuals dying with non-ESRD CKD was 3.89 (p = 0.0051, 95% CI 1.43-8.46) and 3.11 (p = 0.04, 95% CI 0.85-7.95), respectively. The Genealogical Index of Familiality statistic demonstrated that the individuals dying with ESRD are significantly more related than expected in this population (p = 0.013); significant excess relatedness was also observed for individuals dying with non-ESRD CKD (p = 0.006), suggesting a familial component for both, with evidence for common environmental and genetic effects. CONCLUSION: The results of this analysis of individuals dying with ESRD and non-ESRD CKD supports a significant and independent familial component to both conditions, suggesting a heritable factor playing a role.

Role of socioeconomic status in kidney transplant outcome.

There is controversy regarding the influence of genetic versus environmental factors on kidney transplant outcome in minority groups. The goal of this project was to evaluate the role of certain socioeconomic factors in allograft and recipient survival. Graft and recipient survival data from the United States Renal Data System were analyzed using Cox modeling with primary variables of interest, including recipient education level, citizenship, and primary source of pay for medical service. College (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, P < 0.005) and postcollege education (HR 0.85, P < 0.005) improved graft outcome in the whole group and in patients of white race. Similar trends were observed for recipient survival (HR 0.9, P < 0.005 for college; HR 0.88, P = 0.09 for postcollege education) in the whole population and in white patients. Resident aliens had a significantly better graft outcome in the entire patient population (HR 0.81, P < 0.001) and in white patients in subgroup analysis (HR 0.823, P < 0.001) compared with US citizens. A similar effect was observed for recipient survival. Using Medicare as a reference group, there is a statistically significant benefit to graft survival from having private insurance in the whole group (HR 0.87, P < 0.001) and in the black (HR 0.8, P < 0.001) and the white (HR 0.89, P < 0.001) subgroups; a similar effect of private insurance is observed on recipient survival in the entire group of patients and across racial groups. Recipients with higher education level, resident aliens, and patients with private insurance have an advantage in the graft and recipient outcomes independent of racial differences.