Risk of Ophthalmic Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) -induced adverse events (AEs) have been reported affecting almost all human organs. However, studies about ocular AEs are few. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the risks of ICI-related ophthalmic AEs compare to chemotherapy.Methods: Eligible studies were selected from phase II/III randomized controlled trials investigating ICIs. The data were analyzed by R software and Stata. RESULTS: Odds ratio of treatment-related AE (trAEs) and nonspecific ophthalmic trAEs (NS-trAEs) were lower for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors than chemotherapy (OR 0.44, p < .05; OR 0.28, p < .001; OR 0.18, p < . 05; OR: 0.18, p < .001respectively). Compared with monotherapy, PD-1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors increased the risks of immune-related AEs (irAEs) (OR 4.52, p < .01); ICIs plus chemotherapy increased the risks of trAEs and irAEs (OR 2.82, p < .001; OR 3.63, p < .05 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors had lower risks of trAEs and NS-trAEs than chemotherapy; Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy had higher risks of ophthalmic trAEs and irAEs. ABBREVIATION: PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1: programmed cell death protein ligand 1; CTLA-4: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; AE: adverse event; trAE: treatment-related adverse event;irAE: immune-related adverse events; NS-trAE: nonspecific ophthalmic treatment-related adverse event; RCT: randomized controlled trials; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival; ORR: objective response rate; MM: melanoma; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; SCLC: small cell lung cancer; HNSCC: head-neck squamous cell carcinoma; PICOL: patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome; Versus: VS; Chem: chemotherapy; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; FEM: fixed-effects model; REM: random-effects model; NA: not applicable; MeSH: medical subject heading.

Role-play in Endodontic Teaching: a Case Study.

Objective: To investigate the role of the application of role-play in endodontic study in improving the communication skills of Chinese dental undergraduates prior to their direct interactions with patients at the Fourth Military Medical University's School of Stomatology, China. Methods: Students were recruited from the 5-year bachelor's programme (n = 36) and randomly divided into six groups, and from the 8-year DDS programme (n = 10) and randomly divided into two groups to participate in the role-play training. Cases selected randomly from the case pool were distributed to the groups. The teacher gave an outline of the roles in the simulation. Each member of each group randomly selected their own role for the role-play. Four types of surveys were distributed to students and faculty members at different points after the role-plays had taken place, to evaluate their attitude towards the use of role-plays in endodontic study. Frequency analysis and a one sample t test were used to describe and analyse students' acceptance of role-play as a teaching technique. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Students' performance and satisfaction as well as the supporting faculty responses were very favourable towards role-playing. In total, 93.5% of students responded favourably to the role-play, answering 'strongly agree' or 'agree' to the positive statements about their role-play performance. A total of 95.1% of students stated that they had benefited psychologically and technically from the role-play ('strongly agree' or 'agree') after their 1-year rotating internship. Conclusion: The application of role-play in endodontic study is an effective way of educating Chinese dental undergraduates and can be beneficial for their transition from students to dentists.

Risk of Pneumonitis and Pneumonia Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of pneumonitis and pneumonia associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for solid tumors. Methods: The following keywords were used in searching the Embase and PubMed database: pneumonitis, pneumonia, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The data was analyzed by using the R software and Metafor package. Results: Among 3,436 studies, 23 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) met our selection criteria which included data from 12,876 patients. Compared with chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors showed significant increase in grade 1-5 and grade 3-5 pneumonitis (RR, 5.17, 95% CI: 2.82-9.47, p < 0.001; RR, 4.14, 95% CI: 1.82-9.42, p < 0.001), but not in pneumonia. PD-L1 inhibitors showed significant increase in grade 1-5 pneumonitis and pneumonia (RR, 3.25, 95% CI: 1.61-6.57, p < 0.001; RR, 2.11, 95% CI: 1.20-3.70, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in any grade pneumonitis and pneumonia in cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) inhibitors subgroup. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) both showed significant increase in grade 1-5 pneumonitis, and pembrolizumab specially tended to increase grade 3-5 pneumonitis. (RR, 5.64 95% CI: 1.94-16.38, p < 0.001). Compared with PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab) or CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab) monotherapy, PD-1 inhibitor, and CTLA-4 inhibitor (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) combination therapies showed significant increase in grade 1-5 and grade 3-5 pneumonitis (RR 3.47, 95%CI:1.76-6.83, p < 0.001; RR 3.48, 95%CI: 1.10-11.02, p < 0.001). Conclusions: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors treatment could increase the risk of all-grade pneumonitis. CTLA4 inhibitor ipilimumab treatment alone could not increase the risk of pneumonitis but could augment the risk of pneumonitis in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treated patients. There was no significant increase in the risk of pneumonia after either PD-1/PDL-1inhibitor or CTLA4 inhibitor treatment alone or in combination.

Serum level of co-expressed hub miRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Background: Sensitive and specific non-invasive biomarkers are urgently needed in order to improve the survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. We aim to identify serum hub miRNAs as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for PDAC. Methods: A total of 2578 serum miRNA expression data from 88 PDAC patients and 19 healthy subjects were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was constructed and significant modules were extracted from the network by WGCNA R package. Network modules and hub miRNAs closely related to PDAC were identified. The prognostic value of hub miRNAs was assessed by Kaplan-Meier overall survival analysis. Results: Two modules strongly associated with PDAC were identified by WGCNA, which were labeled as turquoise and brown respectively. Within each module, twenty hub miRNAs were found. At the functional level, turquoise module was mainly associated with tumorigenesis pathways such as P53 and WNT signaling pathway, while the brown module was mostly related to the pathways of cancer such as RNA transport and MAPK signaling pathway. Utilizing overall survival analyses, five "real" miRNAs were able to stratify PDAC patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. Conclusions: The association of specific Hub miRNAs with the development of pancreatic cancer was established by WGCNA analysis. Five miRNAs (mir-16-2-3p, mir-890, mir-3201, mir-602, and mir-877) were identified as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for PDAC.

The risk of immune-related endocrine disorders associated with anti-PD-1 inhibitors therapy for solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of immune-related endocrine disorders associated with PD-1 inhibitors therapy for solid tumors. METHODS: An Embase and PubMed search through December 6, 2017, using the following keywords was performed: immune-related endocrine disorders, and PD-1 inhibitors, etc. The data were analyzed using R 3.4.3 (R Project) and the metafor package. Patients treated with chemotherapy alone were used as control for the purpose of comparison. RESULTS: A total of 12 clinical trials including 5577 patients were found eligible for the meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, the risk ratios of all-grade endocrine disorders are 13.89, (95% CI: 5.35-36.05, p < 0.001) for nivolumab therapy, and 9.85, (95% CI: 5.65-17.17, p < 0.001) for pembrolizumab therapy. The risk of all-grade hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism incidence was increased for nivolumab therapy (hypothyroidism: RR 10.07, 95% CI: 3.37-30.11, p < 0.001; hyperthyroidism: RR 4.29, 95% CI: 1.13-16.30, p = 0.034) and for pembrolizumab therapy (hypothyroidism: RR 7.73, 95% CI: 3.86-15.49, p < 0.001; hyperthyroidism: RR 5.09, 95% CI: 2.36-10.97, p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the risk of grade 1-5 endocrine disorders incidence for ipilimumab-nivolumab combination therapy (versus ipilimumab, RR 3.20, 95% CI: 2.08-4.91, p < 0.001; versus nivolumab, RR 2.54, 95% CI: 1.70-3.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both nivolumab and pembrolizumab therapy could result in a higher risk of all-grade immune-related endocrine disorders than chemotherapy. Nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy could result in an even higher risk of all-grade immune-related endocrine disorders than ipilimumab or nivolumab alone. Awareness of these side effects could guide clinicians to better manage the patients treated with anti-PD-1 inhibitors therapy for solid tumors.

Hepatic Re-resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Initial Resection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the post-recurrence survival with hepatic re-resection versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after initial resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All relevant papers were searched via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed according to country. Sensitivity analysis was performed in studies which clearly reported the recurrent regions, in moderate/high-quality studies, in studies published in full-text form, and in studies published after 2005. RESULTS: In total, twelve papers were included in our study. Five and seven of them were of moderate- and poor-quality, respectively. The overall meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significantly higher post-recurrence survival in the hepatic re-resection group than in those undergoing TACE (HR=0.64, 95%CI=0.52-0.79, P<0.0001). Heterogeneity was statistically significant and statistical significance remained in the subgroup analysis. Sensitivity analyses were also consistent with the overall analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic re-resection might provide a better post-recurrence survival than TACE for recurrent HCC after initial resection. However, considering the low quality of published studies and the potential bias of treatment selection, further randomized trials should be warranted to confirm these findings.