Association between comorbid asthma and prognosis of critically ill patients with severe sepsis: a cohort study.

Basic research suggests some contributing mechanisms underlying asthma might at the same time benefit patients with asthma against sepsis, while the potential protective effect of comorbid asthma on prognosis of sepsis has not been well studied in clinical research. The study aimed to assess the association between comorbid asthma and prognosis in a cohort of patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with severe sepsis. Patients with severe sepsis admitted to ICUs were included from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database, and categorized as patients without asthma, patients with stable asthma, and patients with acute exacerbation asthma. The primary study outcome was 28-day mortality since ICU admission. Difference in survival distributions among groups were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable Cox regression was employed to examine the association between comorbid asthma and prognosis. A total of 2469 patients with severe sepsis were included, of which 2327 (94.25%) were without asthma, 125 (5.06%) with stable asthma, and 17 (0.69%) with acute exacerbation asthma. Compared with patients without asthma, patients with asthma (either stable or not) had a slightly younger age (66.73 ± 16.32 versus 64.77 ± 14.81 years), a lower proportion of male sex (56.81% versus 40.14%), and a lower median SAPS II score (46 versus 43). Patients with acute exacerbation asthma saw the highest 28-day mortality rate (35.29%), but patients with stable asthma had the lowest 28-day mortality rate (21.60%) when compared to that (34.42%) in patients without asthma. Consistent results were observed in Kaplan-Meier curves with a p-value for log-rank test of 0.016. After adjusting for potential confounding, compared to being without asthma, being with stable asthma was associated with a reduced risk of 28-day mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.97, p = 0.0335), but being with acute exacerbation asthma was toward an increased risk of 28-day mortality (HR 1.82, 95% 0.80-4.10, p = 0.1513). E-value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding. These findings suggest comorbid stable asthma is associated with a better prognosis in critically ill patients with severe sepsis, while acute exacerbation asthma is associated with worse prognosis.

Will nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis develop into chronic airway obstruction?: a prospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The long-term prognosis of nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to observe the frequency of relapse among patients with NAEB and the likelihood of NAEB developing into chronic airflow obstruction over time. METHODS: Patients with NAEB were followed for at least 1 year between 2003 and 2013. During this period, we evaluated clinical symptoms, sputum eosinophil count, spirometry, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. A linear mixed model was adopted to determine the relationship between time and lung function. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients with NAEB were identified, of whom 141 were followed for > 1 year (median, 4.1 years). Up to 59.6% of patients had a relapse after treatment. Both allergic rhinitis (OR, 4.37; 95% CI, 1.049-18.203; P = .043) and sputum eosinophilia after 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (OR, 9.493; 95% CI, 2.381-37.850; P = .001) were risk factors for relapse. Among the 141 patients, mild asthma developed in eight (5.7%). During the follow-up period, no progressive decline in FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC were observed (P > .05). Although the proportion of small airway dysfunction (maximum midexpiratory flow [MMEF] < 65%) significantly increased at the last visit in all groups (all P < .05), only the relapse group showed an MMEF decline at the end of follow-up (P < .05) in the linear mixed model. CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of patients with NAEB have repeated episodes associated with persistent sputum eosinophilia after treatment and allergic rhinitis. In the current cohort, chronic airway obstruction does not develop despite small airway dysfunction increases over time.

[Diagnostic values of the clinical characteristics of chronic cough].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the clinical characteristics of chronic cough were helpful in determining its specific causes. METHODS: Patients with chronic cough were evaluated by a validated systematic diagnostic protocol. The patients with identified single cause were divided into 4 groups accordingly: cough-variant asthma (CVA), upper airway cough syndrome (UACS) or post-nasal drip syndrome (PNDS), eosinophilic bronchitis (EB), gastroesophageal reflux related cough (GERC), and the characteristics of the timing, character, onset and associated manifestations of chronic cough in different causes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 55 with EB, 45 with UACS, 50 with CVA and 46 with GERC. No significant difference was found in age, gender and course among EB, UACS, CVA and GERC. The incidence of nocturnal cough in CVA was 26.0% (13/44), significantly higher than in EB (9.1% (5/55), chi2 = 5.272, P<0.05), UACS (2.2% (1/45), chi2 = 10.657, P<0.01) and GERC (0% (0/46), chi2 = 13.833, P<0.01). The specificity of nocturnal cough for CVA was 95.9%. The sensitivity and specificity of cough associated with meals in GERC was 52.2% (24/46) and 83.3%, and regurgitation associated symptom in GERC were 69.6% (32/46) and 80.0%, which were significantly higher than other groups. The incidence of postnasal drip, rhinitis associated symptom and case history of nasal diseases in UACS were 66.7% (30/45), 88.9% (40/45) and 82.2% (37/45), and the specificity of them were 89.4%, 65.6% and 63.6% respectively. CONCLUSION: The timing character and some associated symptoms of chronic cough are useful in predicting a single cause.