Association of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Agonistic Autoantibodies With Outcomes in Patients With Acute Aortic Dissection.

Importance: Angiotensin II is significantly associated with the pathogenesis of acute aortic dissection. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor agonistic autoantibodies (AT1-AAs) can mimic the effect of angiotensin II. Objective: To investigate the association between AT1-AAs and all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk in patients with acute aortic dissection. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 662 patients with clinically suspected aortic dissection from 3 medical centers in Wuhan, China, were enrolled in this cohort study from August 1, 2014, to July 31, 2016. Of these, 315 patients were included in the 3-year follow-up study. Follow-up was mainly performed via telephone interviews and outpatient clinic visits. Data analysis was conducted from March 1 to May 31, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, death due to aortic dissection, and late aortic-related adverse events. Results: The full study cohort included 315 patients with AAD (mean [SD] age, 56.2 [12.7] years; 230 men [73.0%]). Ninety-two patients (29.2%) were positive for AT1-AAs. The mortality of AT1-AA-positive patients was significantly higher than that of AT1-AA-negative patients (40 [43.5%] vs 37 [16.6%]; P < .001). The mortality risk in AT1-AA-positive patients was always significantly higher than that in AT1-AA-negative patients in patients with both type A and type B dissection. Multivariable analysis showed that the risk of AT1-AA-positive patients for type A dissection was significantly higher than that of AT1-AA-negative patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.12-3.13; P = .02). The Cox proportional hazards regression model showed a significant increase of all-cause mortality risk (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.44-3.57; P < .001) and late aortic-related adverse events (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.06-2.36; P = .03) among AT1-AA-positive patients during the follow-up period compared with AT1-AA-negative patients. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study first detected AT1-AAs in patients with acute aortic dissection. The presence of AT1-AAs was associated with significantly higher all-cause and cause-specific mortality during a follow-up period of 3 years. The antibodies may be a risk factor for aortic dissection.

Uric acid as a prognostic factor and critical marker of COVID-19.

The purpose of this study is to explore whether uric acid (UA) can independently act as a prognostic factor and critical marker of the 2019 novel corona virus disease (COVID-19). A multicenter, retrospective, and observational study including 540 patients with confirmed COVID-19 was carried out at four designated hospitals in Wuhan. Demographic, clinical, laboratory data were collected and analyzed. The primary end point was in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. The concentration of admission UA (adUA) and the lowest concentration of uric acid during hospitalization (lowUA) in the dead patients were significantly lower than those in the survivors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the concentration of lowUA (OR 0.986, 95% CI 0.980-0.992, p < 0.001) was able to independently predict the risk of in-hospital death. The mean survival time in the low-level group of lowUA was significantly lower than other groups. When lowUA was ≤ 166 µmol/L, the sensitivity and specificity in predicting hospital short-term mortality were 76.9%, (95% CI 68.5-85.1%) and 74.9% (95% CI 70.3-78.9%). This retrospective study determined that the lowest concentration of UA during hospitalization can be used as a prognostic indicator and a marker of disease severity in severe patients with COVID-19.

Nutritional risk and therapy for severe and critical COVID-19 patients: A multicenter retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the nutritional risk and therapy in severe and critical patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A total of 523 patients enrolled from four hospitals in Wuhan, China. The inclusion time was from January 2, 2020 to February 15. Clinical characteristics and laboratory values were obtained from electronic medical records, nursing records, and related examinations. RESULTS: Of these patients, 211 (40.3%) were admitted to the ICU and 115 deaths (22.0%). Patients admitted to the ICU had lower BMI and plasma protein levels. The median Nutrition risk in critically ill (NUTRIC) score of 211 patients in the ICU was 5 (4, 6) and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) score was 5 (3, 6). The ratio of parenteral nutrition (PN) therapy in non-survivors was greater than that in survivors, and the time to start nutrition therapy was later than that in survivors. The NUTRIC score can independently predict the risk of death in the hospital (OR = 1.197, 95%CI: 1.091-1.445, p = 0.006) and high NRS score patients have a higher risk of poor outcome in the ICU (OR = 1.880, 95%CI: 1.151-3.070, p = 0.012). After adjusted age and sex, for each standard deviation increase in BMI, the risk of in-hospital death was reduced by 13% (HR = 0.871, 95%CI: 0.795-0.955, p = 0.003), and the risk of ICU transfer was reduced by 7% (HR = 0.932, 95%CI:0.885-0.981, p = 0.007). The in-hospital survival time of patients with albumin level ≤35 g/L was significantly decreased (15.9 d, 95% CI: 13.7-16.3, vs 24.2 d, 95% CI: 22.3-29.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Severe and critical patients with COVID-19 have a high risk of malnutrition. Low BMI and protein levels were significantly associated with adverse events. Early nutritional risk screening and therapy for patients with COVID-19 are necessary.