The contribution of cumulative blood pressure load to dementia, cognitive function and mortality in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Few studies evaluated the contribution of long-term elevated blood pressure (BP) towards dementia and deaths. We examined the association between cumulative BP (cBP) load and dementia, cognitive decline, all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in older Australians. We also explored whether seated versus standing BP were associated with these outcomes. METHODS: The Sydney Memory and Aging Study included 1037 community-dwelling individuals aged 70-90 years, recruited from Sydney, Australia. Baseline data was collected in 2005-2007 and the cohort was followed for seven waves until 2021. cSBP load was calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) for SBP ≥140 mmHg divided by the AUC for all SBP values. Cumulative diastolic BP (cDBP) and pulse pressure (cPP) load were calculated using thresholds of 90 mmHg and 60 mmHg. Cox and mixed linear models were used to assess associations. RESULTS: Of 527 participants with both seated and standing BP data (47.7% men, median age 77), 152 (28.8%) developed dementia over a mean follow-up of 10.5 years. Higher cPP load was associated with a higher risk of all-cause deaths, and cSBP load was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular deaths in multivariate models (P for trend < 0.05). Associations between cPP load, dementia and cognitive decline lost statistical significance after adjustment for age. Differences between sitting and standing BP load were not associated with the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Long-term cPP load was associated with a higher risk of all-cause deaths and cSBP load associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular deaths in older Australians.

Echocardiographic predictors of cardiovascular outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: The optimal echocardiographic predictors of cardiovascular outcome in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unknown. We aimed to identify independent echocardiographic predictors of cardiovascular outcome in patients with HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Systematic literature search of three electronic databases was conducted from date of inception until November 2022. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for echocardiographic variables from multivariate prediction models for the composite primary endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization were pooled using a random effects meta-analysis. Specific subgroup analyses were conducted for studies that enrolled patients with acute versus chronic HF, and for those studies that included E/e', pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), renal function, natriuretic peptides and diuretic use in multivariate models. Forty-six studies totalling 20 056 patients with HFpEF were included. Three echocardiographic parameters emerged as independent predictors in all subgroup analyses: decreased left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.39 per 5% decrease), decreased left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.1.50 per 5% decrease) and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to PASP ratio (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.25 per 0.1 unit decrease). Other independent echocardiographic predictors of the primary endpoint were a higher E/e', moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation, LV mass index and LA ejection fraction, although these variables were less robust. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired LV global longitudinal strain, lower LA reservoir strain and lower TAPSE/PASP ratio predict cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization in HFpEF and are independent of filling pressures, clinical characteristics and natriuretic peptides. These echocardiographic parameters reflect key functional changes in HFpEF, and should be incorporated in future prospective risk prediction models.

Therapeutic Inertia With Initial Low-Dose Quadruple Combination Therapy for Hypertension: Results From the QUARTET Trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose combinations are a promising intervention for improving blood pressure (BP) control but their effects on therapeutic inertia are uncertain. METHODS: Analysis of 591 patients randomized to an ultra-low-dose quadruple pill or initial monotherapy. The episode of therapeutic inertia was defined as a patient visit with a BP of >140/90 mm Hg without intensification of antihypertensive treatment. We compared the frequency of therapeutic inertia episodes between Quadpill and initial monotherapy as a proportion of the total population (intention-to-treat analysis with the denominator being all participants randomized) and as a proportion of people with uncontrolled BP (with the denominator being participants with uncontrolled BP). RESULTS: Therapeutic inertia occurred in fewer participants randomized to Quadpill compared with monotherapy. For example, among the 390 participants with a 6-month follow-up, therapeutic inertia according to unattended BP was 21/192 (11%) versus 45/192 (23%), P=0.002. There were similar rates of therapeutic inertia among those with uncontrolled unattended BP in each group (all P>0.4). Consistent observations were seen with the use of attended office BP measures. The major determinants of not intensifying treatment during follow-up were BP readings that were close to target and large improvements in BP compared with the previous visit. CONCLUSIONS: Among all treated individuals, low-dose Quadpill reduced the number of therapeutic inertia episodes compared with initial monotherapy. After the first follow-up visit, most high BP values did not lead to treatment intensification in both groups. Education is needed about the importance of treatment intensification despite a significant improvement in BP or BP being close to target. REGISTRATION: URL: https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=ACTRN12616001144404; Unique identifier: ACTRN12616001144404.

Efficacy of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis of 63,677 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) coexists in up to 50% of heart failure (HF) patients, affecting both those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Although the efficacy of several guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) has been well established, the treatment recommendations are similar for those patients with HF with and without CKD. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of GDMT in patients with HF with versus those without CKD. METHOD: This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials that compared the efficacy of GDMT (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACE-I], beta blocker, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor) in patients with HF with and without CKD. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalisation. Risk ratios (RR) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 19 trials (15 trials in HFrEF and four trials in HFpEF) enrolling 63,677 (38% had CKD) participants were included. Among HFrEF patients, GDMT reduced the primary endpoint in those with CKD (RR 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.82) and without CKD (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.84). Among HFpEF patients, the pooled summary RR for GDMT reducing the primary endpoint was 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.91) among those with CKD and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) among those without CKD. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of GDMT in head-to-head comparisons between those with and without CKD in HFrEF (ratio of RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.06) and HFpEF (ratio of RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with HF, GDMT had a consistent effect in reducing adverse cardiovascular events in those with and without CKD. Future studies should investigate the best strategy to ensure patients with HF with CKD receive and tolerate GDMT when indicated.

Association between systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with coronary heart disease according to age.

BACKGROUND: The impact of elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) at different stages of life is unclear. We aimed to investigate whether genetically mediated SBP/LDL-C is associated with the risk of CHD throughout life. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a three-sample Mendelian randomization analysis using data from the UK Biobank including 136,648 participants for LDL-C, 135,431 participants for SBP, and 24,052 cases for CHD to assess the effect of duration of exposure to the risk factors on risk of CHD. Analyses were stratified by age at enrolment. In univariable analyses, there was a consistent association between exposure to higher LDL-C and SBP with increased odds of incident CHD in individuals aged ≤55 years, ≤60 years, and ≤65 years (p-value for heterogeneity = 1.00 for LDL-C and 0.67 for SBP, respectively). In multivariable Mendelian randomization analyses, exposure to elevated LDL-C/SBP early in life (age ≤55 years) was associated with a higher risk of CHD independent of later life levels (age >55 years) (odds ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.20-2.34 per 1 mmol/L LDL-C, and odds ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.51 per 10 mmHg SBP). CONCLUSIONS: Genetically predicted SBP and LDL-C increase the risk of CHD independent of age. Elevated SBP and LDL-C in early to middle life is associated with increased CHD risk independent of later-life SBP and LDL-C levels. These findings support the importance of lifelong risk factor control in young individuals, whose risk of CHD accumulates throughout life.

An adenoviral-vectored vaccine confers seroprotection against capsular group B meningococcal disease.

Adenoviral-vectored vaccines are licensed for prevention of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Ebola virus, but, for bacterial proteins, expression in a eukaryotic cell may affect the antigen's localization and conformation or lead to unwanted glycosylation. Here, we investigated the potential use of an adenoviral-vectored vaccine platform for capsular group B meningococcus (MenB). Vector-based candidate vaccines expressing MenB antigen factor H binding protein (fHbp) were generated, and immunogenicity was assessed in mouse models, including the functional antibody response by serum bactericidal assay (SBA) using human complement. All adenovirus-based vaccine candidates induced high antigen-specific antibody and T cell responses. A single dose induced functional serum bactericidal responses with titers superior or equal to those induced by two doses of protein-based comparators, as well as longer persistence and a similar breadth. The fHbp transgene was further optimized for human use by incorporating a mutation abrogating binding to the human complement inhibitor factor H. The resulting vaccine candidate induced high and persistent SBA responses in transgenic mice expressing human factor H. The optimized transgene was inserted into the clinically relevant ChAdOx1 backbone, and this vaccine has now progressed to clinical development. The results of this preclinical vaccine development study underline the potential of vaccines based on genetic material to induce functional antibody responses against bacterial outer membrane proteins.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Triple and Quadruple Combination Pills vs Monotherapy, Usual Care, or Placebo for the Initial Management of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Low-dose combination (LDC) antihypertensives consisting of 3 or 4 blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs have emerged as a potentially important therapy for the initial management of hypertension. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of LDC therapies for the management of hypertension. Data Sources: PubMed and Medline were searched from date of inception until September 2022. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials comparing LDC consisting of 3 or 4 BP-lowering drugs compared to either monotherapy, usual care, or placebo. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted by 2 independent authors and synthesized using both random and fixed-effects models using risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mean reduction in systolic BP (SBP) between LDC and monotherapy, usual care, or placebo. Other outcomes of interest included the proportion of patients achieving BP less than 140/90 mm Hg, rates of adverse effects, and treatment withdrawal. Results: Seven trials with a total of 1918 patients (mean [mean range] age, 59 [50-70] years; 739 [38%] female) were included. Four trials involved triple-component LDC and 3 involved quadruple-component LDC. At 4 to 12 weeks follow-up, LDC was associated with a greater mean reduction in SBP than initial monotherapy or usual care (mean reduction, 7.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, 4.3-10.5) and placebo (mean reduction, 18.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, 15.1-20.8). LDC was associated with a higher proportion of participants achieving BP less than 140/90 mm Hg at 4 to 12 weeks compared to both monotherapy or usual care (66% vs 46%; RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.27-1.52) and placebo (54% vs 18%; RR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.93-4.77). There was no significant heterogeneity between trials enrolling patients with and without baseline BP-lowering therapy. Results from 2 trials indicated LDC remained superior to monotherapy or usual care at 6 to 12 months. LDC was associated with more dizziness (14% vs 11%; RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.00-1.63) but no other adverse effects nor treatment withdrawal. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in the study showed that LDCs with 3 or 4 antihypertensives were an effective and well-tolerated BP-lowering treatment option for the initial or early management of hypertension.

Under-representation of ethnic and regional minorities in lipid-lowering randomized clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: The efficacy of lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) amongst different ethnicities and regions remains unclear. We aimed to assess cardiovascular event reductions associated with LLT according to ethnicity and region in previously published randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for RCTs of statins, ezetimibe, or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors comparing intensive vs. less-intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted per mmol/L reduction in LDL-C. Fifty-three trials with 329 897 participants were included. Amongst participants, 39.5% were from Europe, 16.0% from North America, 9.0% from Japan, 2.8% from Australasia, 1.8% from South America, 1.1% from Asia, 0.6% from South Africa, and 29.2% were unspecified. Amongst trials reporting ethnicities, there were 60.3% White, 20.2% Japanese, 9.4% Asian, 5.5% Black, and 4.7% Latin American. There was reduction in MACE with LLT in regions including Australasia (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.85), North America (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.83), Europe (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.86), and Japan (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85) and in Black ethnicity (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.82). Head-to-head comparisons between regions and ethnicities revealed no significant differences in MACE reduction. CONCLUSION: Despite under-representation in clinical trials, regional and ethnic minority groups such as Australasia and Blacks appear to derive at least as much cardiovascular benefit from LLT.

Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) can effectively reduce cardiovascular disease across different ethnicities and regions, reinforcing the importance of their widespread use in at-risk populations. There is under-representation of several minority groups such as those from South Africa, South America, and Asia, as well as Black, Latin American, and Asian ethnicities. Furthermore, amongst included populations, the benefits of LLT appear to be consistent across regions and ethnicities.The findings of this study highlight the importance of ensuring at-risk patients have access to LLT regardless of ethnicity or region. Future trials should ensure adequate representation of all patient groups.

Clinical Utility of Short-Term Blood Pressure Measures to Inform Long-Term Blood Pressure Management.

BACKGROUND: Decisions about hypertension management are substantially influenced by blood pressure (BP) levels measured before and soon after starting BP lowering drugs. We aimed to assess the utility of short-term BP changes in individuals in terms of long-term treatment response. METHODS: Post hoc analyses of 2 randomized trials with 4-to-6 weeks active run-in for all participants, followed by randomization to active BP lowering treatment (combination perindopril±indapamide) or placebo. We categorized individuals by degree of systolic BP (SBP) change during active run-in treatment and assessed associations with subsequent postrandomization placebo-corrected BP reduction, cardiovascular events, and tolerability. We included individuals with baseline BP ≥140/90 mm Hg from the PROGRESS trial (Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study; 4275 individuals with cerebrovascular disease) and ADVANCE trial (The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation; 6610 individuals with diabetes). RESULTS: During the active run-in period, the proportion of participants with initial SBP changes in 4 categories (SBP increase, 0-9.9 mm Hg decrease, 10-19.9 mm Hg decrease, and ≥20 mm Hg decrease) were 17%, 27%, 28%, and 28% in PROGRESS and 21%, 22%, 24%, and 33% in ADVANCE. Randomization to active therapy achieved similar placebo-corrected long-term BP reductions across the 4 initial SBP change groups in both trials (P-values for heterogeneity >0.1). There was no significant difference in achieving BP <140/90 mm Hg at follow-up, major cardiovascular events, nor treatment tolerability according to the SBP change during active run-in period (all P-values >0.1). CONCLUSIONS: An individual's apparent BP change immediately after commencing therapy has limited clinical utility. Therefore, more emphasis should be given to use of evidence-based regimens and measures over the long-term to ensure sustained BP control. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT00145925.

Benefits of intensified reductions in blood glucose and in blood pressure for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Adequate blood glucose and blood pressure control is paramount for the prevention of microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This review article summarises the important advances in blood glucose and blood pressure lowering from the last three decades, with a focus on the evidence from large scale randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses. This paper focuses on evidence supporting specific blood glucose and blood pressure targets, and the importance of long-term sustained risk factor control. Novel therapies including the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes and highlighted the importance of approaches that deliver benefits beyond glucose or blood pressure lowering. This article provides an overview of contemporary management of T2D with an emphasis on tailoring treatment plans to the individual.

Sex-specific differences in the efficacy of heart failure therapies: a meta-analysis of 84,818 patients.

Women have been historically underrepresented in clinical trials of heart failure (HF). We aimed to assess for sex differences in patient characteristics and the efficacy of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in HF. Systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of GDMT reporting cardiovascular outcomes by sex in patients with HF. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using inverse variance weighting and random effects meta-analysis. Twenty-six RCTs totaling 84,818 participants (27% women) were included. Women with HF were older, had higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, more hypertension and obesity, and higher mean left ventricular ejection fraction compared to men. There was evidence for most GDMT in reducing the primary outcome in women with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor blocker [RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.97], angiotensin-receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) [RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94], beta-blocker [RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.89], ivabradine [RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91], and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors [RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.81]) and a non-significant trend for benefit with mineralocorticoid-receptor-antagonist (MRA) [RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.52-1.16]). Compared to men with HFrEF, GDMT reduced the primary outcome in women to a similar degree across all drug classes (ratio of RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96-1.14). Despite differences in baseline characteristics and an underrepresentation of women in HF clinical trials, GDMT are as efficacious in women as compared to men in reducing cardiovascular events in HF.

The Burden of Proof studies: assessing the evidence of risk.

Exposure to risks throughout life results in a wide variety of outcomes. Objectively judging the relative impact of these risks on personal and population health is fundamental to individual survival and societal prosperity. Existing mechanisms to quantify and rank the magnitude of these myriad effects and the uncertainty in their estimation are largely subjective, leaving room for interpretation that can fuel academic controversy and add to confusion when communicating risk. We present a new suite of meta-analyses-termed the Burden of Proof studies-designed specifically to help evaluate these methodological issues objectively and quantitatively. Through this data-driven approach that complements existing systems, including GRADE and Cochrane Reviews, we aim to aggregate evidence across multiple studies and enable a quantitative comparison of risk-outcome pairs. We introduce the burden of proof risk function (BPRF), which estimates the level of risk closest to the null hypothesis that is consistent with available data. Here we illustrate the BPRF methodology for the evaluation of four exemplar risk-outcome pairs: smoking and lung cancer, systolic blood pressure and ischemic heart disease, vegetable consumption and ischemic heart disease, and unprocessed red meat consumption and ischemic heart disease. The strength of evidence for each relationship is assessed by computing and summarizing the BPRF, and then translating the summary to a simple star rating. The Burden of Proof methodology provides a consistent way to understand, evaluate and summarize evidence of risk across different risk-outcome pairs, and informs risk analysis conducted as part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study.

Effects of elevated systolic blood pressure on ischemic heart disease: a Burden of Proof study.

High systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a major risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD), the leading cause of death worldwide. Using data from published observational studies and controlled trials, we estimated the mean SBP-IHD dose-response function and burden of proof risk function (BPRF), and we calculated a risk outcome score (ROS) and corresponding star rating (one to five). We found a very strong, significant harmful effect of SBP on IHD, with a mean risk-relative to that at 100 mm Hg SBP-of 1.39 (95% uncertainty interval including between-study heterogeneity 1.34-1.44) at 120 mm Hg, 1.81 (1.70-1.93) at 130 mm Hg and 4.48 (3.81-5.26) at 165 mm Hg. The conservative BPRF measure indicated that SBP exposure between 107.5 and 165.0 mm Hg raised risk by 101.36% on average, yielding a ROS of 0.70 and star rating of five. Our analysis shows that IHD risk was already increasing at 120 mm Hg SBP, rising steadily up to 165 mm Hg and increasing less steeply above that point. Our study endorses the need to prioritize and strengthen strategies for screening, to raise awareness of the need for timely diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and to increase the resources allocated for understanding primordial prevention of elevated blood pressure.

Cumulative Systolic Blood Pressure Load and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Standard measures of blood pressure (BP) do not account for both the magnitude and duration of exposure to elevated BP over time. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between cumulative systolic blood pressure (SBP) load and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes followed by the ADVANCE-ON (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation - Observational Study). Cumulative SBP load was defined as the area under curve for SBP values ≥130 mm Hg divided by the area under curve for all measured SBP values over a 24-month exposure period. HRs for the association between cumulative SBP load with major cardiovascular events and death were estimated using Cox models. RESULTS: Over a median 7.6 years of follow-up, 1,469 major cardiovascular events, 1,615 deaths, and 660 cardiovascular deaths were observed in 9,338 participants. Each 1-SD increase in cumulative SBP load was associated with a 14% increase in major cardiovascular events (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09-1.20), 13% increase in all-cause mortality (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.13-1.18), and 21% increase in cardiovascular death (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.13-1.29). For the prediction of cardiovascular events and death, cumulative SBP load outperformed mean SBP, time-below-target SBP, and visit-to-visit SBP variability in terms of Akaike information criterion and net reclassification indexes. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative SBP load may provide better prediction of major cardiovascular events compared with traditional BP measures among patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings reinforce the importance of both the magnitude and duration of exposure to elevated SBP in assessing cardiovascular risk. (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation Post Trial Observational Study [ADVANCE-ON]; NCT00949286).

Compounding Benefits of Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy for the Reduction of Major Cardiovascular Events: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mendelian randomization studies use genetic variants as natural experiments to provide evidence about causal relations between modifiable risk factors and disease. Recent Mendelian randomization studies suggest each mmol/L reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) sustained over a lifetime can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease by more than half. However, these findings have not been replicated in randomized clinical trials, and the effect of treatment duration on the magnitude of risk reduction remains uncertain. The aim of this article was to evaluate the relationship between lipid-lowering drug exposure time and relative risk reduction of major cardiovascular events in randomized clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors that report LDL-C levels and effect sizes for each year of follow-up. The primary end point was major vascular events, defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization. Hazard ratios during each year of follow-up were meta-analyzed using random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 21 trials with 184 012 patients and an average mean follow-up of 4.4 years were included. Meta-regression showed there was greater relative risk reduction in major vascular events with increasing duration of treatment (P<0.001). For example, each mmol/L LDL-C lowered was associated with a relative risk reduction in major vascular events of 12% (95% CI, 8%-16%) for year 1, 20% (95% CI, 16%-24%) for year 3, 23% (95% CI, 18%-27%) for year 5, and 29% (95% CI, 14%-42%) for year 7. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of LDL-C lowering do not seem to be fixed but increase steadily with longer durations of treatment. The results from short-term randomized trials are compatible with the very strong associations between LDL-C and cardiovascular events seen in Mendelian randomization studies.

Association of Low-Dose Triple Combination Therapy vs Usual Care With Time at Target Blood Pressure: A Secondary Analysis of the TRIUMPH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Cumulative exposure to high blood pressure (BP) is an adverse prognostic marker. Assessments of BP control over time, such as time at target, have been developed but assessments of the effects of BP-lowering interventions on such measures are lacking. Objective: To evaluate whether low-dose triple combination antihypertensive therapy was associated with greater rates of time at target compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Triple Pill vs Usual Care Management for Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension (TRIUMPH) trial was a open-label randomized clinical trial of low-dose triple BP therapy vs usual care conducted in urban hospital clinics in Sri Lanka from February 2016 to May 2017. Adults with hypertension (systolic BP >140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP >90 mm Hg or in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, systolic BP >130 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP >80 mm Hg) requiring initiation (untreated patients) or escalation (patients receiving monotherapy) of antihypertensive therapy were included. Patients were excluded if they were currently taking 2 or more blood pressure-lowering drugs or had severe or uncontrolled blood pressure, accelerated hypertension or physician-determined need for slower titration of treatment, a contraindication to the triple combination pill therapy, an unstable medical condition, or clinically significant laboratory values deemed by researchers to be unsuitable for the study. All 700 individuals in the original trial were included in the secondary analysis. This post hoc analysis was conducted from December 2020 to December 2021. Intervention: Once-daily fixed-dose triple combination pill (telmisartan 20 mg, amlodipine 2.5 mg, and chlorthalidone 12.5 mg) therapy vs usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Between-group differences in time at target were compared over 24 weeks of follow-up, with time at target defined as percentage of time at target BP. Results: There were a total of 700 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 56 [11] years; 403 [57.6%] women). Patients allocated to the triple pill group (n = 349) had higher time at target compared with those in the usual care group (n = 351) over 24 weeks' follow-up (64% vs 43%; risk difference, 21%; 95% CI, 16-26; P < .001). Almost twice as many patients receiving triple pill therapy achieved more than 50% time at target during follow-up (64% vs 37%; P < .001). The association of the triple pill with an increase in time at target was seen early, with most patients achieving more than 50% time at target by 12 weeks. Those receiving the triple pill achieved a consistently higher time at target at all follow-up periods compared with those receiving usual care (mean [SD]: 0-6 weeks, 36.3% [30.9%] vs 21.7% [28.9%]; P < .001; 6-12 weeks, 55.2% [31.9%] vs 33.7% [33.0%]; P < .001; 12-24 weeks, 66.0% [31.1%] vs 43.5% [34.3%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: To our knowledge, this analysis provides the first estimate of time at target as an outcome assessing longitudinal BP control in a randomized clinical trial. Among patients with mild to moderate hypertension, treatment with a low-dose triple combination pill was associated with substantially higher time at target compared with usual care.

Predictors and outcomes of quality of life in elderly patients with heart failure.

Study objective: This study aims to identify predictors of health related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with heart failure (HF) and assess whether HRQoL was a predictor of rehospitalisation and mortality, and if age influenced the findings. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Seven hospitals in the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia. Participants: Community dwelling patients who completed a Minnesota Living with HF questionnaire (MLHFQ) within 30 days of discharge after a HF hospitalisation. Main outcome measure: Multivariable linear regression models were used to identify predictors of MLHFQ scores (higher score = worse HRQoL) and adjusted Cox regression models to assess the impact of MLHFQ scores on one-year rehospitalisation and mortality. Separate analyses were conducted for those aged ≤80 or >80 years. Results: 1911 patients of mean age 79 years (57 % aged >80 years) were included in this analysis. Among those aged ≤80 years; younger age, lower haemoglobin and presenting symptoms at hospitalisation of exertional dyspnoea, peripheral oedema and fatigue were predictors of worse post-discharge MLHFQ scores. In patients aged >80 years, living alone, chronic kidney disease, exertional dyspnoea and peripheral oedema were predictors of worse MLHFQ scores. Worse MLHFQ scores predicted one-year HF readmissions in those aged >80 years (HR 1.22, 95 % CI 1.07-1.37) but not those aged ≤80 years (HR 0.90 95 % CI 0.71-1.10). Conclusions: In-hospital predictors can be identified for worse HRQoL post-discharge for HF. These vary according to age, and should be addressed prior to discharge.

Halving cardiovascular risk with combined blood pressure and cholesterol lowering - Why are we not there yet?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess whether the modest major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reductions in previous trials testing combined blood pressure (BP) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction were due to modest risk factor reduction and/or a negative interaction, whereby the joint effects of therapy are less than expected. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing patients who received combination BP and cholesterol lowering treatment versus placebo. We calculated the expected relative risk reduction (RRR) in MACE based on the observed reductions in systolic BP and LDL-C in each trial and previous meta-analysis of the individual modalities. RESULTS: All five included trials achieved small SBP reductions (range 1 to 6 mmHg) and small-to-moderate LDL-C reductions (range 0.5 to 1.1 mmol/L), which were all less than expected. Each of the three largest trials achieved significant reductions in MACE and the observed vs expected RRRs were closely aligned: - ASCOT observed RRR 32% (95% CI 18-43%) vs expected RRR 24% (95% CI 20-28%); HOPE-3 observed RRR 28%, (95% CI 10-42%) vs expected RRR 28% (95% CI 23%-31%); TIPS-3 observed RRR 20% (95% CI 0%-36%) vs expected RRR 21% (95% CI 18-24%). CONCLUSIONS: MACE reductions seen in past trials of combined BP and LDL-C reflect the degree of risk factor reduction. Sustained and substantial reductions in BP and LDL-C (eg. ≥15 mmHg and ≥ 1.5 mmol/L) are required to halve cardiovascular risk, which in turn requires long-term adherence to intensive LDL-C lowering and combination BP therapy.

Peri-ureteric mass an unusual case of immunoglobin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD).

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) of the ureter is a rarely reported disease, often mimicking urothelial carcinoma. This paper describes a case of an otherwise healthy patient with a lesion involving the ureter revealed on Computed tomography (CT), avid on fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET), that prior to surgery was suspicious for urothelial carcinoma, until intra-op frozen section revealed otherwise. Diagnosis of ureteral IgG4-RD should be considered as a differential diagnosis, with serum IgG4 levels obtained.