RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breath-hold volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (BH-VIBE) of multiphase contrast-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MPCE-LMRI) requires good cooperative individuals to comply with multiple breath-holds. PURPOSE: To develop a free-breathing modified VIBE (FB-mVIBE) as a substitute of BH-VIBE in MPCE-LMRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We modified VIBE with a high acceleration factor (2 × 2) and four averages to produce the mVIBE scan. A total of 90 individuals (40 men; mean age = 54.6 ± 10.0 years) who had received MPCE-LMRI as part of a voluntary health check-up for oncology survey were enrolled. Each participant was scanned in four phases (pre-contrast, arterial phase, venous phase, and delay phase), and each phase had two sequential scans. To encounter the timing effect of contrast enhancement, three scan orders were designed: BH-VIBE and FB-mVIBE (group A, n = 30); BH-VIBE and FB-VIBE (group B, n = 30); and FB-mVIBE and BH-VIBE (group C, n = 30). The comparisons included the objective measurements and 25 visual-score by two abdominal radiologists independently. RESULTS: Consistency between raters was observed for all three sequences (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.741-0.829). For rater 1, the mean scores of FB-mVIBE (23.67 ± 1.32) were equal to those of BH-VIBE (23.83 ± 1.98) in groups C and B (P = 0.852). The mean scores of FB-mVIBE (22.07 ± 3.02), but significantly higher than those of FB-VIBE (14.7 ± 3.41) in groups A and B (P <0.001). Similar scores were found for rater 2. The objective measurement of FB-mVIBE were equal to or higher than BH-VIBE and markedly superior to FB-VIBE. CONCLUSION: FB-mVIBE is a practical alternative to BH-VIBE for individuals who cannot cooperate with multiple breath-holds for MPCE-LMRI.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To determine if mammography combined with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), leads to superior performance in screening for breast cancer compared to digital mammography (DM) alone. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from A) the results of population-based mammography-screening provided by the National Cancer Registry in Taiwan, and B) the results from all screening mammography performed with DBT from 2012 through 2015 at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (VGHKS) since the institution of DBT at the end of 2011. This was compared data from 3 years with DM performed prior to DBT implementation. We calculated the results of medical audit of VGHKS and compared this with national data. Fisher's exact test is applied. RESULTS: VGHKS data demonstrated a higher cancer detection rate (CDR) and positive predictive value 1 (PPV 1) than the national average. Most prominently in the year 2014, our CDR was 120% better than that of the national average. CDR ranged from 6.3 to 8.1 prior to the introduction of DBT, and following DBT implementation this improved to 8.5-11.4, reflecting a mean increase of 32.2%. Early cancer detection was 50% higher and node negative rate was 25% higher than the national average of latest year. A 17.8% reduction in recall rate (RR) was achieved due to a decrease in unnecessary recall. CONCLUSION: There was a 32.2% increase in CDR and a 17.8% decrease in RR when DBT was used as an adjunct to DM, as compared to DM alone. CDRs were approximately twofold better than national average data. DBT was more effective at detecting cancer in ductal carcinoma in situ and stage 1.
