Health-care costs and utilization related to long- or short-acting antiepileptic monotherapy use.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare health-care utilization and costs in patients treated with long-acting (LA) vs. short-acting (SA) antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of claims from the OptumInsight™ database. Our analysis was restricted to adults diagnosed with epilepsy and who used AED monotherapy. Patients were excluded if they used >1 type of AED, had <9months of treatment, or had a treatment gap of >60days. Antiepileptic drugs were classified as LA or SA based on published data and expert opinion. Medical and pharmacy claims were used to estimate health-care utilization and costs, and baseline group differences were adjusted using multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There were 4058 (49.6%) LA AED users and 4122 (50.4%) SA AED users. Medication possession ratios (MPRs) were not significantly different between LA AED users and SA AED users (P=0.125). Long-acting AED users had lower mean overall health-care costs ($9757 vs. $12,689), lower epilepsy-related costs ($3539 vs. $5279), and lower rate of overall (8.8% vs. 10.9%) and epilepsy-related hospitalizations (5.7% vs. 7.6%) compared with SA AED users (all P<0.01). After adjusting for demographics and clinical characteristics, mean overall costs were lower by $686 and the mean epilepsy-related costs were lower by $894 in LA AED users. CONCLUSION: Although MPRs were similar in LA AED and SA AED groups, patients treated with LA monotherapy had a lower economic burden compared with those treated with SA monotherapy, indicating that using AEDs with extended duration of action is associated with decreased health-care use and lower health-care costs.

Effectiveness of antiepileptic drug combination therapy for partial-onset seizures based on mechanisms of action.

IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, the current study is the first to describe antiepileptic drug (AED) combination therapy patterns according to their mechanism of action (MOA) in a real-world setting and to evaluate the differences in outcomes comparing different-MOA combination therapy with same-MOA combination therapy for patients with partial-onset seizure. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment persistence and health care use with AED combinations categorized by MOA in patients with partial-onset seizures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims Database containing 96 million covered lives from July 1, 2004, through March 31, 2011, adults with concomitant use of 2 different AEDs and a recent partial-onset seizure diagnosis were selected. Antiepileptic drugs were categorized by MOA: sodium channel blockers (SC), gamma-aminobutyric acid analogs (G), synaptic vesicle protein 2A binding (SV2), and multiple mechanisms (M). Patients were assigned a combination category based on their concomitant AED use. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Treatment persistence was measured from the start of AED combination therapy until the end of the combination. Health care resource use was measured during the combination treatment duration. Multivariate analyses evaluated AED discontinuation risk and health care use according to MOA combinations. RESULTS: Distribution of 8615 selected patients by combination was 3.3% for G+G, 7.5% for G+SV2, 8.6% for G+M, 13.9% for SC+SC, 19.0% for G+SC, 21.5% for SC+M, and 26.3% for SC+SV2. The same-MOA (G+G and SC+SC) combinations had the shortest persistence (mean [SD], 344 [345] days and 513 [530] days, respectively) and greater hazard of discontinuation compared with different-MOA combinations. Patients with different-MOA G combinations had a significantly lower risk for inpatient admission (odds ratio, 0.716; 95% CI, 0.539-0.952; P = .02) compared with G+G combinations. Patients with different-MOA SC combinations had significantly lower risks for emergency department visits (odds ratio, 0.853; 95% CI, 0.742-0.980; P = .03) compared with SC+SC combinations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that AED combinations with different MOAs have greater effectiveness as measured by treatment persistence and lower risks for hospitalization and emergency department visits. Further research is needed to more fully understand the role of the MOA in achieving optimal outcomes.

Healthcare utilization and costs in children with stable and uncontrolled epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy adversely affects childhood development, possibly leading to increased economic burden in pediatric populations. We compared annual healthcare utilization and costs between children (<12 years old) with stable and uncontrolled epilepsy treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: Children (<12 years old) with epilepsy (ICD-9-CM 345.xx or 780.39) in 2008 were identified in the MarketScan claims database from 2007 to 2009. Patients with "stable" epilepsy used the same AED for ≥12 months, and patients with "uncontrolled" epilepsy were prescribed additional AED(s) during that period. For patients with uncontrolled epilepsy, the study index date was the start of additional AED(s); for patients with stable epilepsy, the study index date was a random AED fill date. Epilepsy-related utilization included medical services with 345.xx or 780.39 in any diagnosis field and AED fills. Epilepsy-related costs included AEDs, medical claims with epilepsy in any diagnosis field, and certain tests. We adjusted for baseline cohort differences (demographics, region, usual-care physician specialty, and comorbidities) using logistic regression and analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred seventy patients were identified (mean: 7.5 years; 45.3% were female; Charlson comorbidity index: 0.3; 422 (19.4%) patients with uncontrolled epilepsy). Patients with uncontrolled epilepsy faced more hospitalizations (30.1% vs. 12.0%) and greater overall ($30,343 vs. $18,206) and epilepsy-related costs ($16,894 vs. $7979) (all p<.001). Adjusting for baseline measures, patients with uncontrolled epilepsy had greater odds of hospitalization (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.9-3.3) and costs (overall: $3908, p=.087; epilepsy-related: $5744, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Children with uncontrolled epilepsy use significantly more healthcare resources and have a greater economic burden than children with stable epilepsy. However, epilepsy accounted for only half of overall costs, indicating that comorbid conditions may add substantially to the disease burden.

Healthcare utilization and costs in adults with stable and uncontrolled epilepsy.

Despite the availability of numerous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), some epilepsies remain resistant to treatment. We compared utilization and costs in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy to those with stable epilepsy. Claims data (2007-2009) were used to identify adults with epilepsy requiring additional AED therapy (having uncontrolled epilepsy) and those not requiring additional AED therapy (having stable epilepsy). The date in 2008 on which an additional AED was started was the index date for patients with uncontrolled epilepsy, and a randomly selected date was used for patients with stable epilepsy, whose AED use was unchanged in the preceding year. In the postindex year, all pharmacy and medical claims were used to estimate overall utilization and costs; claims with epilepsy in any diagnosis field were used to estimate epilepsy-related outcomes. Outcomes were adjusted using multivariate analyses. We identified 1536 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy and 8571 patients with stable epilepsy (mean age: 42.8years; female: 48%). Patients with uncontrolled epilepsy had higher comorbidity rates (p<.02). A greater proportion of patients with uncontrolled epilepsy had ≥1 hospitalization or emergency department visit (p<.001). Patients with uncontrolled epilepsy had a greater mean length of hospital stay and more physician office visits (p<.034). After adjustment, the odds of hospitalization (OR: 1.8, any diagnosis; 2.2, epilepsy-related) and emergency department visit (OR: 1.6, any diagnosis; 1.9, epilepsy-related) were greater for patients with uncontrolled epilepsy. Annual overall ($23,238 vs. $13,839) and epilepsy-related ($12,399 vs. $5511) costs were higher in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy and remained higher after adjustment (p<.001). Patients with uncontrolled epilepsy use more services and incur higher costs compared with those with stable epilepsy. Epilepsy-related costs accounted for <50% of the total costs, suggesting that comorbid conditions and/or underidentification of utilization may substantially contribute to costs.