[Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of 2 modalities of intravenous cibenzoline administration in the reduction of recent spontaneous atrial arrhythmia]. / Etude comparative de l'efficacité et de la tolérance de deux modalités d'administration de la cibenzoline intraveineuse dans la réduction des arythmies auriculaires spontanées et récentes.

This multicentre, single blind, parallel group study compared the efficacy and clinical and electrocardiographic tolerance of a 2 minute intravenous administration of cibenzoline at a dose of 1.2 mg.kg-1 with that of a 10 minute 1.75 mg.kg-1 infusion in patients presenting with spontaneous atrial fibrillation (AF) for less than 6 weeks. Sixty-two patients (40 men and 22 women) with an average age of 62 years and presenting with sustained AF for at least 30 minutes with a ventricular rate greater than or equal to 80 bpm were randomly assigned to groups and received via the intravenous route either one of the two treatments. Efficacy (return to sinus rhythm) was assessed by an ECG recording every 5 minutes and at 45 and 60 minutes thereafter. Sixty-one of the 62 randomised patients were assessed for efficacy. Cibenzoline, administered in the form of a bolus or infusion, proved effective within one hour in 4 patients in each group (13%) and arrhythmia persisted with ventricular rate of less than 80 bpm in 10 (33%) and 5 (16%) of the patients respectively. In patients in whom sinus rhythm was not restored, ventricular rate was significantly reduced by cibenzoline. The patients in whom normal rhythm was restored under one of these treatment regimens were significantly younger. Patients in whom rhythm returned to normal following the administration of the bolus had AF of significantly more recent onset than that of the patients in whom abnormal rhythm persisted, whilst the history of the AF did not differ significantly between these two types of response after the infusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Combination of oral administration of cibenzoline and digoxin in patients with supraventricular arrhythmia]. / Association de la cibenzoline et de la digoxine administrées par voie orale chez des patients ayant une arythmie supraventriculaire.

Chronic co-administration of digoxin and several antiarrhythmic drugs increases digoxin plasma levels. To determine the effects of the administration of oral cibenzoline on digoxin plasma levels and its effects on clinical and electrocardiographic parameters, we conducted a prospective multicenter study in 22 cardiac patients with a mean age of 66 +/- 12 years (39-85), who were on long term digoxin therapy (0.25 mg once daily for at least 2 weeks) and who required oral cibenzoline therapy in the prevention of recurrence of symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmias. Cibenzoline was given for 4 weeks at a dose of 130 mg twice daily in patients aged less than 70 years (group I, n = 15) and this dosage was reduced by half in patients over 70 years of age (group II, n = 7). Evaluation of the effects of this combination on clinical and electrocardiographic tolerability as well as the drawing of blood samples for assay of cibenzoline and digoxin took place before and after 4 weeks treatment with cibenzoline. The digoxin plasma levels were (mean +/- sem) 0.96 +/- 0.1 ng.ml-1 before cibenzoline administration and remained unchanged after 4 weeks of combination therapy (1.0 +/- 0.1 ng.ml-1), p > 0.05. Digoxin plasma levels in group I varied from respectively 0.8 +/- 0.1 ng.ml-1 (0.5-1.7) to 0.8 +/- 0.1 ng.ml-1 (0.4-1.5) and in group II from 1.2 +/- 0.2 ng.ml-1 (0.6-2) to 1.4 +/- 0.3 ng.ml-1 (0.7-2.5). This therapy was well tolerated in 16 patients out of 21 evaluable patients (76%) and there was no significant change in vital signs during the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative study of encainide and disopyramide in chronic ventricular arrhythmias: a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study.

Ten patients suffering from chronic premature ventricular complexes (greater than 60/h) were treated orally in a double-blind crossover study with encainide (50 mg three times a day) and disopyramide (200 mg three times a day), with five 7 day study periods: survey, placebo, encainide or disopyramide, washout placebo and disopyramide or encainide. At the end of each 7 day period, a 12 lead electrocardiogram, a 48 hour ambulatory electrocardiogram and a treadmill exercise test were performed. Blood levels of encainide and its metabolites and of disopyramide were measured at the end of each treatment (steady state). Drug efficacy was assessed by: 1) more than 80% reduction in the number of premature ventricular complexes per 24 hours, and 2) absence of ventricular tachycardia. Encainide was effective in four patients (complete suppression of premature ventricular complexes) and ineffective in five. One patient who showed a 92% reduction in the number of premature ventricular complexes developed sustained ventricular tachycardia after 24 hours of treatment. Disopyramide was effective in three patients (greater than 80% reduction in the number of premature ventricular complexes) and ineffective in seven patients. With encainide, the percent increase in PR, QRS and QT interval duration was, respectively: 32.7 (p less than 0.001), 30.8 (p less than 0.001) and 10.6% (p less than 0.01). With disopyramide this increase was not significant. Despite the variability of drug blood levels, a relation between blood levels and suppression of premature ventricular complexes on the 48 hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was found with encainide, but not with disopyramide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)