Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Meat Sci ; 87(1): 81-7, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20926201

RESUMO

The aim of this research was to investigate the effects of high pressure processing (HPP) on consumer acceptance for chilled ready meals manufactured using a low-value beef cut. Three hundred consumers evaluated chilled ready meals subjected to 4 pressure treatments and a non-treated control monadically on a 9-point scale for liking for beef tenderness and juiciness, overall flavour, overall liking, and purchase intent. Data were also collected on consumers' food consumption patterns, their attitudes towards food by means of the reduced food-related lifestyle (FRL) instrument, and socio-demographics. The results indicated that a pressure treatment of 200 MPa was acceptable to most consumers. K-means cluster analysis identified 4 consumer groups with similar preferences, and the optimal pressure treatments acceptable to specific consumer groups were identified for those firms that would wish to target attitudinally differentiated consumer segments.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor , Manipulação de Alimentos/métodos , Estilo de Vida , Produtos da Carne/análise , Paladar , Adulto , Animais , Bovinos , Análise por Conglomerados , Temperatura Baixa , Comportamento Alimentar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Carne/normas , Pressão , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Meat Sci ; 84(4): 711-7, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20374847

RESUMO

A method to discriminate between various grades of pork and turkey ham was developed using colour and wavelet texture features. Image analysis methods originally developed for predicting the palatability of beef were applied to rapidly identify the ham grade. With high quality digital images of 50-94 slices per ham it was possible to identify the greyscale that best expressed the differences between the various ham grades. The best 10 discriminating image features were then found with a genetic algorithm. Using the best 10 image features, simple linear discriminant analysis models produced 100% correct classifications for both pork and turkey on both calibration and validation sets.


Assuntos
Produtos da Carne/análise , Produtos da Carne/normas , Animais , Cor , Manipulação de Alimentos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Produtos da Carne/classificação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Suínos/genética , Perus/genética
3.
Meat Sci ; 81(2): 313-20, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22064169

RESUMO

This paper presents a novel and non-destructive approach to the appearance characterization and classification of commercial pork, turkey and chicken ham slices. Ham slice images were modelled using directional fractal (DF(0°;45°;90°;135°)) dimensions and a minimum distance classifier was adopted to perform the classification task. Also, the role of different colour spaces and the resolution level of the images on DF analysis were investigated. This approach was applied to 480 wafer thin ham slices from four types of hams (120 slices per type): i.e., pork (cooked and smoked), turkey (smoked) and chicken (roasted). DF features were extracted from digitalized intensity images in greyscale, and R, G, B, L(∗), a(∗), b(∗), H, S, and V colour components for three image resolution levels (100%, 50%, and 25%). Simulation results show that in spite of the complexity and high variability in colour and texture appearance, the modelling of ham slice images with DF dimensions allows the capture of differentiating textural features between the four commercial ham types. Independent DF features entail better discrimination than that using the average of four directions. However, DF dimensions reveal a high sensitivity to colour channel, orientation and image resolution for the fractal analysis. The classification accuracy using six DF dimension features (a(90°)(∗),a(135°)(∗),H(0°),H(45°),S(0°),H(90°)) was 93.9% for training data and 82.2% for testing data.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...