The use of tramadol following day--case oral surgery.

This prospective, randomised double-blinded study was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy and occurrence of nausea when tramadol is added to a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug to provide analgesia following day-case third molar teeth extraction. All patients received oral diclofenac pre-operatively and one of four treatments intra-operatively: fentanyl and metoclopramide, tramadol and metoclopramide, fentanyl and ondansetron, or tramadol and ondansetron. There were no significant differences between groups in scores for pain in the early postoperative period. However, there were significant differences in nausea scores at this time, with the fentanyl-ondansetron group having the lowest and the tramadol-ondansetron group having the highest scores. There were no significant differences in the incidence of pain or nausea in the following 24 h. We conclude that the addition of tramadol to diclofenac results in no useful improvement in analgesic effect, and that the use of ondansetron fails to reduce the nausea associated with tramadol.

Intravenous tenoxicam for analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (power of 80% to detect a 30% reduction in morphine consumption, P < 0.05) we have determined that intraoperative intravenous administration of tenoxicam 40 mg during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, when compared with placebo, was associated with a significant reduction in consumption of morphine at 6 hours and 12 hours (P < 0.05) but not at 24 hours, when assessed by patient-controlled analgesia. Furthermore there was a significantly greater requirement for "rescue" analgesia with intramuscular morphine in the placebo group during the period of the study. There was no difference between the groups in pain scores, either at rest or on movement, nor in the incidence of nausea and vomiting. No patient in either group suffered a respiratory rate less than 8/min or oversedation at any time, and there were no other adverse effects.

An audit cycle of blood ordering practice in a district maternity unit reduces unnecessary crossmatching.

We audited the appropriateness of blood ordering in our obstetric unit, by analysing the ratio of number of units of blood cross-matched to number transfused (C:T ratio), both overall and for specific indications. Based on this information, we devised a new blood ordering policy, and repeated the audit once this was in operation. The new policy resulted in a substantial increase in the efficiency of blood ordering. The overall C:T ratio fell from 10.9 to 3.0, and there were particularly large falls for caesarean section (from 34.3 to 6.2), high risk labours (from 67.8 to 9.1) and post-partum haemorrhage/retained placenta (from 4.3 to 1.9).

Blood ordering practices in obstetric units in the United Kingdom.

A postal questionnaire on blood ordering practices and blood availability was sent to 89 randomly selected maternity units within the United Kingdom. The replies demonstrated a wide variation in crossmatching practices. Of those units that replied, 56% crossmatch for elective and 64% for emergency Caesarean section, 54% for manual removal of placenta, and 29% for fetal distress in labour. The remainder 'group and screen' for these indications. Lack of 24 h cover by a resident haematology technician, and location of blood banks distant to the obstetric unit were associated with significant delays in blood availability. More extensive use of the 'group and screen' technique may reduce unnecessary crossmatching without jeopardizing patient safety, and is advocated for maternity units.

The laryngeal mask airway in infants.

Clinical and fibreoptic assessment of positioning of the size 1 laryngeal mask airway was performed in 50 infants. A clinically patent airway was obtained in 47 patients at the first attempt, but perfect positioning, as assessed by fibreoptic laryngoscopy, was found in only 22 instances. Despite an airway initially patent, delayed airway obstruction occurred in 12 infants. It is concluded that clinical airway patency does not guarantee ideal positioning of LMA in infants, and that care should be taken to ensure continued airway patency because of the tendency of the LMA position to deteriorate in this group of children.

Prospective, controlled, double-blind study of i.v. tenoxicam for analgesia after thoracotomy.

We have shown that a single i.v. dose of tenoxicam 20 mg, after thoracotomy, when compared with placebo in 20 patients (with one exclusion), was associated with a reduction in consumption of papaveretum, assessed by patient-controlled analgesia, of 2.2 mg h-1 (22%) to 4 h and 1.4 mg h-1 (23%) to 12 h after operation (repeated measures analysis of variance: P less than 0.01). There was no reduction from 12 to 24 h. There was no significant difference between groups in pain scores or in side effects.

A comparison of azapropazone and aspirin for pain relief following dental extractions.

Eighty patients received one of three treatments after elective dental surgery involving multiple extractions. Group A received aspirin 600 mg, group B azapropazone 300 mg and group C azapropazone 600 mg. All drugs were administered in a double-blind fashion. Quality of analgesia was unsatisfactory for all treatments; over 30% of patients required supplementary analgesia with an opioid. In addition there were a large number of withdrawals from the study. There were no significant differences in analgesic efficacy between groups.

Extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section in achondroplasia.

We describe the successful management of a 26-yr-old achondroplastic dwarf undergoing elective Caesarean section under extradural anaesthesia. The patient had marked thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis and clinical features which suggested that tracheal intubation would prove difficult. Block sufficient for surgery required only 5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and, apart from an initial unilateral block and mild intraoperative hypotension, her perioperative course was uneventful.