Red flags and adjusted suspicion index for distinguishing hereditary transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy from idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of hereditary ATTR polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN) is important since treatment options have become available, which are most effective early in the disease course. ATTRv-PN is likely underdiagnosed as patients might be misdiagnosed with idiopathic polyneuropathy. It is uncertain if it is useful to test for TTR gene mutations in patients with a typical presentation for chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) and which are the distinguishing clinical features. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort study to assess the yield of TTR gene sequencing in patients with polyneuropathy and assessed if the identified patients with ATTRv-PN had a clinical presentation typical of CIAP. Additionally, we assessed which clinical features, including previously defined red flag symptoms, can differentiate between patients with CIAP and ATTRv-PN and assessed the performance of the TTR suspicion index. RESULTS: Out of 338 patients with polyneuropathy, 10 patients had a pathogenic TTR gene mutation (all p.Val50Met) and none had a clinical presentation typical of CIAP. Patients with ATTRv-PN more often had bilateral CTS, motor involvement of arms, cardiac involvement, family history suggestive of hATTRv, and autonomic symptoms than patients with CIAP. All patients with ATTRv-PN as well as 70% of patients with CIAP fulfilled the suspicion index. CONCLUSION: Routine TTR gene sequencing in patients with a typical presentation for CIAP is not useful. However, red flag symptoms can differentiate patients with ATTRv-PN from patients with CIAP. We propose an adjusted version of the TTR suspicion index to increase diagnostic yield.

Enriched enrollment randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial with phenytoin cream in painful chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (EPHENE): a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) can have neuropathic pain that significantly impacts quality of life. Oral neuropathic pain medication often has insufficient pain relief and side effects. Topical phenytoin cream could circumvent these limitations. The primary objectives of this trial are to evaluate (1) efficacy in pain reduction and (2) safety of phenytoin cream in patients with painful CIAP. The main secondary objective is to explore the usefulness of a double-blind placebo-controlled response test (DOBRET) to identify responders to sustained pain relief with phenytoin cream. METHODS: This 6-week, enriched enrollment randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled triple cross-over trial compares phenytoin 20%, 10% and placebo cream in 48 participants with painful CIAP. Enriched enrollment is based on a positive DOBRET in 48 participants who experience within 30 minutes ≥2 points pain reduction on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) in the phenytoin 10% cream applied area and ≥1 point difference in pain reduction on the NRS between phenytoin 10% and placebo cream applied area, in favour of the former. To explore whether DOBRET has predictive value for sustained pain relief, 24 DOBRET-negative participants will be included. An open-label extension phase is offered with phenytoin 20% cream for up to one year, to study long-term safety. The main inclusion criteria are a diagnosis of CIAP and symmetrical neuropathic pain with a mean weekly pain score of ≥4 and <10 on the NRS. The primary outcome is the mean difference between phenytoin 20% versus placebo cream in 7-day average pain intensity, as measured by the NRS, over week 2 in DOBRET positive participants. Key secondary outcomes include the mean difference in pain intensity between phenytoin 10% and phenytoin 20% cream, and between phenytoin 10% and placebo cream. Furthermore, differences between the 3 interventions will be evaluated on the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, EuroQol EQ5-5D-5L, and evaluation of adverse events. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of phenytoin cream in patients with painful CIAP and will give insight into the usefulness of DOBRET as a way of personalized medicine to identify responders to sustained pain relief with phenytoin cream. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04647877 . Registered on 1 December 2020.

Vegetarians, Pescatarians and Flexitarians with Adequate Vitamin B12 Levels Have No Increased Risk of Polyneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, an increasing number of people adapt to a vegetarian, pescatarian or flexitarian dietary pattern that reduces the consumption of meat and fish. Although these dietary patterns have a risk for developing vitamin B12 deficiency associated polyneuropathy, it is unknown whether this risk is still increased when vitamin B12 levels are adequate. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a vegetarian, pescatarian or flexitarian dietary pattern is associated with an increased risk for idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study that included 256 idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy patients with adequate vitamin B12 blood levels and 630 controls. We used questionnaire data to determine the frequency of meat and fish consumption and defined dietary patterns. RESULTS: The vegetarian (no meat or fish consumption) and the pescatarian (fish consumption, no meat consumption) dietary patterns showed no increased risk of axonal polyneuropathy. Frequency-effect analysis and quantity-effect analysis also did not show that a reduction of meat or fish consumption (flexitarian dietary pattern), either small or large, changed the risk of axonal polyneuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find an increased risk for axonal polyneuropathy among people with a vegetarian, pescatarian or flexitarian diet and an adequate vitamin B12 level.

Clinical relevance of testing for metabolic vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with polyneuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: Determine vitamin B12 threshold levels below which additional testing of methylmalonic acid (MMA) and/or homocysteine (Hcy) is useful to diagnose metabolic vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with polyneuropathy, and how vitamin B12, MMA and Hcy levels relate to the effect of supplementation therapy. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study of 331 patients with polyneuropathy, vitamin B12, MMA and Hcy were measured. Linear regression models with vitamin B12 as dependent and Hcy or MMA as covariate were compared, to assess which was best related to vitamin B12. Threshold vitamin B12 levels for metabolic deficiency (defined as elevatede metabolites) were determined using logistic regression with elevated metabolites as dependent and vitamin B12 as covariate. A structured interview was conducted in 42 patients to evaluate response to vitamin B12 supplementation. RESULTS: MMA was best related to vitamin B12. Using elevated MMA for metabolic deficiency, we found 90% sensitivity at a vitamin B12 threshold level <264 pmol/L (358 pg/mL) and 95% sensitivity at <304 pmol/L (412 pg/mL). Improvement after supplementation was reported by 19% patients and stabilization by 24%. 88% of patients with improvement and 90% with stabilization either had absolute deficiency (Vitamin B12 < 148 pmol/L) or metabolic deficiency (elevated MMA and vitamin B12 ≥ 148 pmol/L). There were no additional patients with improvement or stabilization with isolated elevated Hcy. CONCLUSION: Testing of MMA has additional value in identifying patients with clinically relevant metabolic deficiency when vitamin B12 is below 304 pmol/L (412 pg/mL). Supplementation can be effective in patients with absolute and metabolic deficiency.

Statins do not increase risk of polyneuropathy: A case-control study and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there is an association between cholesterol-lowering medication use, specifically statins, and chronic polyneuropathy. METHODS: A literature study was carried out to assess the current state of evidence on the association between chronic polyneuropathy and cholesterol-lowering medication use. We also conducted a prospective case-control study to compare exposure to cholesterol-lowering medication between patients with cryptogenic axonal polyneuropathy and controls prior to the index date (defined in patients as date of onset of polyneuropathy symptoms, in controls as date of first study survey). Outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders such as cardiovascular history and metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: The 13 studies identified in our literature search showed conflicting results (odds ratios [ORs] ranging from 0.66 to 14.2), but most studies had methodologic limitations. There was insufficient evidence that statin use is a risk factor for polyneuropathy. Our prospective case-control study included 333 patients with cryptogenic axonal polyneuropathy and 283 controls. Patients with polyneuropathy were less likely to have been exposed to statins than controls (OR 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.95, p = 0.03). The odds of polyneuropathy decreased as exposure duration to statins increased. Cholesterol-lowering medication consisted almost exclusively of statins; therefore we only draw conclusions on the effect of statin use. CONCLUSIONS: Statin use does not increase the risk of chronic polyneuropathy. Therefore, statins should not be routinely withheld from polyneuropathy patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that statin use does not increase the risk of polyneuropathy.