Piloting a Text Message-based Social Support Intervention for Patients With Chronic Pain: Establishing Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy.

OBJECTIVES: To examine preliminarily the effectiveness of a short message service (SMS) text message-based social support intervention for reducing daily pain and pain interference levels, improving affect and perceptions of social support in patients with chronic noncancer pain, and exploring the feasibility of a novel mobile application to track perceptions of pain and pain interference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants (17 men, 51 women) from 2 pain clinics in New York City downloaded a pain tracking application (App) on their Smartphone and used it to record twice-daily pain, pain interference, and affect scores over the 4-week study period. Participants were randomly assigned to receive standard care (control) or standard care along with receipt of twice-daily supportive SMS text messages delivered during the second and third week of the study (intervention). Demographic and clinical data were obtained at baseline, and social support measures were administered at baseline and at 4 weeks. Statistical analysis was carried out using general linear mixed models, taking into account variances associated with time of assessments and with patients. RESULTS: The social support intervention reduced perceptions of pain and pain interference and improved positive affect for chronic noncancer pain patients assigned to the intervention condition in comparison with controls. Participants completed approximately 80% of the daily measurements requested. DISCUSSION: These findings establish the feasibility of collecting daily pain data using a mobile tracking App and provide significant implications and insight into a nuanced approach to reducing the daily experience of pain through mobile technology, especially because of its accessibility.

Identifying Key Priorities for Future Palliative Care Research Using an Innovative Analytic Approach.

Using an innovative approach, we identified research priorities in palliative care to guide future research initiatives. We searched 7 databases (2005-2012) for review articles published on the topics of palliative and hospice-end-of-life care. The identified research recommendations (n = 648) fell into 2 distinct categories: (1) ways to improve methodological approaches and (2) specific topic areas in need of future study. The most commonly cited priority within the theme of methodological approaches was the need for enhanced rigor. Specific topics in need of future study included perspectives and needs of patients, relatives, and providers; underrepresented populations; decision-making; cost-effectiveness; provider education; spirituality; service use; and interdisciplinary approaches to delivering palliative care. This review underscores the need for additional research on specific topics and methodologically rigorous research to inform health policy and practice.

Why is high-quality research on palliative care so hard to do? Barriers to improved research from a survey of palliative care researchers.

BACKGROUND: Substantial agreement has been achieved on research priorities in palliative care over the past 15 years, as evidenced by consensus conferences and systematic reviews. Despite the presence of a widely endorsed research agenda, however, addressing the gaps in scientific knowledge has progressed slowly, suggesting that researchers face significant obstacles to conducting high-quality research on the most pressing topics in the field. OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify barriers to improved and expanded palliative care research as reported by researchers. DESIGN: Semistructured telephone interviews to solicit barriers to research in palliative care. SETTING/SUBJECTS: A purposive, interdisciplinary sample of 61 leading researchers in palliative care. MEASUREMENTS: Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using standard qualitative methods. RESULTS: Respondents named five barriers impeding progress: (1) funding, (2) institutional capacity, (3) researcher workforce, (4) challenges related to the topic and population (e.g., attrition, heightened human subjects protections), and (5) public and professional misunderstanding of palliative care and aversion to topics related to serious illness and end-of-life. CONCLUSIONS: Research in palliative care is being held back by significant barriers that require the attention of institutions and funders. The consensus within the interdisciplinary sample indicates that concentrated effort to address barriers related to funding and researcher workforce could facilitate progress on established research priorities. More research is needed on viable strategies for overcoming the identified barriers.

Chronic pain perspectives: Managing chronic pain in older adults: 6 steps to overcoming medication barriers.

These practical tips will help improve the likelihood of a successful analgesic trial in patients 65 and older.