RESUMO
As rapidly accelerating technology, fluorescence guided surgery (FGS) has the potential to place molecular information directly into the surgeon's field of view by imaging administered fluorescent contrast agents in real time, circumnavigating pre-operative MR registration challenges with brain deformation. The most successful implementation of FGS is 5-ALA-PpIX guided glioma resection which has been linked to improved patient outcomes. While FGS may offer direct in-field guidance, fluorescent contrast agent distributions are not as familiar to the surgical community as Gd-MRI uptake, and may provide discordant information from previous Gd-MRI guidance. Thus, a method to assess and validate consistency between fluorescence-labeled tumor regions and Gd-enhanced tumor regions could aid in understanding the correlation between optical agent fluorescence and Gd-enhancement. Herein, we present an approach for comparing whole-brain fluorescence biodistributions with Gd-enhancement patterns on a voxel-by-voxel basis using co-registered fluorescent cryo-volumes and Gd-MRI volumes. In this initial study, a porcine-human glioma xenograft model was administered 5-ALA-PpIX, imaged with MRI, and euthanized 22 hours following 5-ALA administration. Following euthanization, the extracted brain was imaged with the cryo-macrotome system. After image processing steps and non-rigid, point-based registration, the fluorescence cryo-volume and Gd-MRI volume were compared for similarity metrics including: image similarity, tumor shape similarity, and classification similarity. This study serves as a proof-of-principle in validating our screening approach for quantitatively comparing 3D biodistributions between optical agents and Gd-based agents.
RESUMO
The three main factors in spoilage resulting from post-processing can handling operations are: (a) condition of the can double-seams, (b) presence of bacterial contamination in cooling water or on wet can runways and (c) can abuse due to poor operation or adjustment of the filled can handling equipment. The mechanism of bacterial reinfection and the way it is influenced by deviations in can construction or can handling procedures is discussed. Methods of preventing bacterial reinfection at the most critical points in the canning operations are given as well as certain guiding principles for canning practice. In addition, some remarks on physical aspects of reinfection of glass-packed foods are made briefly.
