Patient satisfaction with oral versus nonoral therapeutic approaches in onychomycosis.

The follow-up results of a 9-month observational study of 150 onychomycosis patients treated with a variety of mechanical, topical, and oral therapies by podiatric physicians and dermatologists are presented. Changes from baseline in toenail condition and patient satisfaction were assessed at 4- and 9-month follow-up. At 9 months, patients who had received oral therapy reported significantly fewer onychomycosis-related problems in social situations, including embarrassment or self-consciousness about the appearance of nails, avoidance of contact by others, being perceived as unclean or untidy, and the desire to keep their nails concealed. Patient-reported satisfaction with the treatment program was significantly higher for those receiving oral therapy than for those receiving nonoral therapy.

Relationship of first-year costs of treating localized prostate cancer to initial choice of therapy and stage at diagnosis: results from the CAPSURE database.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship among the initial choice of therapy, stage at presentation, and first-year treatment costs in men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer. METHODS: First-year resource use and clinical data were collected for 235 subjects with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer. The costs were estimated from the standard Medicare payment schedules. The relationship among the initial therapy, stage at presentation, and overall cost was examined for the entire cohort and in the subgroup of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. In addition, the inpatient, outpatient, and medication cost components were evaluated separately to determine what influenced the changes in cost by stage. RESULTS: The mean first-year cost of treating localized prostate cancer in CaPSURE was $6375. When broken down by stage, the mean first-year cost for patients with Stage T1c was $5731, with T2a/b was $6426, and with Stage T2c was $6810 (P = 0.059). The initial treatment choice was significantly associated with the total first-year costs (P <0.001). The mean cost specifically for radical prostatectomy patients with Stage T1c disease was $6881, with T2a/b was $7216, and with T2c was $8027 (P = 0.004). The increases in the first-year cost with higher stage appeared to primarily be associated with increased inpatient resource use and the greater use of adjuvant hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The first-year costs of treating localized prostate cancer in CaPSURE are associated with the choice of primary and adjuvant therapy. This supports the notion that cost savings may be possible with earlier detection of disease or by minimizing the use of hormonal adjuvant therapy.

Use of second treatment following definitive local therapy for prostate cancer: data from the caPSURE database.

PURPOSE: We compare secondary cancer treatment use in patients who underwent definitive local treatment for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The rate of second cancer treatment was determined in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (1,254), radiotherapy (499) or cryosurgery (141) using data from the CaPSURE database, a longitudinal disease registry of patients with prostate cancer. Second treatments started within 3 months after initial treatment were defined as adjuvant and those started more than 3 months were defined as nonadjuvant. Using a parametric regression model of survival analysis, second treatment rates were adjusted for differences in clinical and demographic characteristics, and duration of followup among groups. RESULTS: Of the patients 4% received a second adjuvant treatment and 17% received a second nonadjuvant treatment within 3 years of initial therapy. Adjusted rates of nonadjuvant second treatment were lowest after radical prostatectomy, and 34 and 88% higher after radiation and cryosurgery, respectively (p = 0.01). This finding was most evident in patients with pretreatment prostate specific antigen 10.0 ng./ml. or less, clinical stage T2N0M0 disease, or Gleason score 6 or less on diagnostic biopsy, and in those classified as low risk for recurrence based on a combination of these parameters (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 5 patients receive second cancer treatment within a mean of 3 years following initial local treatment for prostate cancer. Our data suggest that the likelihood of receiving second treatment was lowest in patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy.