What defines a great surgeon? A survey study confronting perspectives.

Background: The definition of a great surgeon is usually reported by surgeons themselves. The objective of the study was to define a multifaceted definition of a great surgeon, by confronting patients', healthcare workers', and surgeons' perspectives. Study design: An online open-ended questionnaire was created to identify three qualities and three shortcomings defining a great surgeon. Age, gender, and profession of respondents were collected. Responses with a similar meaning were combined into word groups and labeled within four themes: human qualities, technical surgical skills (TSS), non-technical skills (NTS), and knowledge. Multivariate analyses were conducted between themes and respondent characteristics. Results: Four thousand seven hundred and sixty qualities and 4,374 shortcomings were obtained from 1,620 respondents including 385 surgeons, 291 patients, 565 operating theater (OT) health professionals, and 379 non-OT health professionals. The main three qualities were dexterity (54% of respondents), meticulousness (18%), and empathy (18%). There was no significant difference between professional categories for TSS. Compared with surgeons, non-OT health professionals and patients put more emphasis on human qualities (29 vs. 39% and 42%, respectively, p < .001). OT health professionals referred more to NTS than surgeons (35 vs. 22%, p < 0.001). Knowledge was more important for surgeons (19%) than for all other professional categories (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This survey illustrates the multifaceted definition of a great surgeon. Even if dexterity is a major quality, human qualities are of paramount importance. Knowledge seems to be underestimated by non-surgeons, although it essential to understand the disease and preparing the patient and OT team for the procedure.

[Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children: A Team effort!] / Syndrome d'apnées obstructives du sommeil de l'enfant : une affaire d'équipe !

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in children, which has a multifactorial origin, can lead, if not treated, to severe medical complications, growth disturbances, behavioural changes and reduced quality of life. Nowadays, it is underdiagnosed whereas early screening, diagnosis and interdisciplinary treatment are essential. Furthermore, many families and health professionals do not often know where to go when there is suspicion of OSA for a child. Orthodontists are uniquely positioned to screen, to refer to the appropriate specialist and to treat, if needed, patients who may be at high risk for OSA. The authors describe the synergistic means to screen, diagnose and treat paediatric OSA in a collaborative and interactive approach between ENT, orthodontists, pneumo-allergologists, sleep physicians, endocrinologists, orofacial myo-functional therapists and speech therapists. These means which are clinically illustrated in this paper fit the guidelines which have been recently published as white papers by official professional specialists organisations involved in paediatric OSA treatment (AAPD, AAO, FFO, SFORL, SFRMS…). The development of multidisciplinary teams gathering specialists who are conscious about the mutual benefits of the specialties involved in paediatric OSA should contribute to optimize the child treatment care pathway and the short, mid and long term outcomes.

Endonasal measurements by acoustic rhinometry in children: A preliminary study.

The acoustic reflection method (ARM) is a non-invasive technique which uses the reflection of acoustic waves to measure the cross sectional area of nasal cavities in adults and patency of endotracheal tubes. Characteristics and volume of normal nasal cavities in pre-school children has so far not been studied. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal ARM recording and the minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) and volume (NV) values in healthy children. DESIGN: Prospective monocentric study using the ARM in pre-school children (<6 years of age). RESULTS - DISCUSSION: Seventy children (age 2 to 5) were included in the study. Reliable measures were difficult to obtain in children younger than 2 years of age. The use of a standard nosepiece and a single-use surgical filter enabled reliable, serial recordings. Mean MCA values were 0.46, 0.53 and 0.58 cm2 in the 24-35, 36-47 and 48-60 months-old age groups, respectively. Mean NV values were 2.14, 2.59, and 2.86 cm3 in the same age groups. The MCA and NV values were significantly correlated with height, age and weight. In conclusion, the ARM is feasible in children over the age of 2 and seems to be a promising non-invasive tool to study the nasal cavity patency, anatomy, and volume.