Oral contraceptive use and smoking habits in young Israeli women: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Oral contraceptive users are at increased risk for both arterial and venous thrombosis, some of which can be fatal. Studies are consistent with the existence of a synergism between cigarette smoking and OC use in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction in young women. OBJECTIVES: To study the relationship between OC use, cigarette smoking and other cardiovascular risk factors among young women. METHODS: A systematic sample of military personnel, upon discharge from service in the Israel Defense Forces, was asked to complete a research questionnaire. Body weight and height were measured and body mass index computed. RESULTS: Overall, 16,258 questionnaires were collected and analyzed during this 20 year study. There was a gradual, significant increase in OC use until the mid-1980s, from approximately 45% to 60% (P < 0.001), followed by steady rates of 58-64% since then. In contrast, the rates of smoking decreased significantly in the mid-1980s, from approximately 42% to a nadir of 22% in 1991. Since then, the rate of smoking has increased slowly but steadily to reach a level of 35% in 1999. The OC users were more often of western (Ashkenazi) origin and came from families with more education and fewer siblings. They were more often smokers than non-OC users, and started smoking at a younger age. They had significantly lower BMI than non-users. OC use was nearly identical in groups with or without multiple cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, obesity, family history). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking and OC use are strongly associated. Other cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, obesity, family history) do not prevent OC users from smoking or smokers to use OC. We suggest that primary care physicians discourage smoking among adolescent females who wish to start using OC. A thorough medical history should be obtained in order to recognize all risk factors for cardiovascular disease and to provide for appropriate contraception counseling.

Quality assessment program in primary care clinics: a tool for quality improvement.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of health care is a major ongoing project of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) medical corps. OBJECTIVE: (i) To describe mechanisms of quality assessment (QA) in IDF primary care clinics; (ii) to compare quality of care in different types of primary care clinics; and (iii) to test the hypothesis that implementation of the QA program results in improved quality of care. RESEARCH DESIGN: A prospective, single-blinded, uncontrolled, non-randomized study. MEASURES: Teams of two physicians carry out the QA process once or twice a year according to clinic size. Five areas were evaluated: (i) physician-patient interaction; (ii) medical chart evaluation; (iii) high-risk patients management; (iv) medical care provided by specialists; and (v) medical staff guidance. Clinics were classified in two groups: single-physician clinics (battalion troop clinics) and multi-physician clinics (home-front base clinics). General Linear Models were used for analysis. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In 2000 and 2001, 99 primary clinics and 162 primary care physicians were assessed. Seventy-four (45%) physicians were evaluated twice. Single-physician clinics scored higher than multi-physician clinics on most QA parameters. Physicians had significantly better QA results at the second encounter, regardless of the type of clinic. CONCLUSIONS: A primary care medicine QA system is feasible in the IDF. It allows for standardized, reliable, and comprehensive assessment of primary care across the military clinics. We postulate that the increase in QA assessment scores from one examination to the next one indicates an improvement in quality due to the QA program.

Evaluating delivery of primary health care to military personnel during low-intensity conflict using a patient satisfaction survey.

The delivery of medical health care to soldiers serving in active front units in the Israeli Defense Forces requires the ability to adjust to different military activity settings. This study was conducted to compare patient satisfaction, as a tool for assessing quality of care, in different activity settings: training and Low-intensity conflict setting. A patient satisfaction survey was conducted simultaneously in battalions during low-intensity conflict and training activities. Data analysis showed that patients' perception of the quality of care they received and of medical staff attitude was higher in the conflict setting. Correlation analysis revealed that patients during conflict perceived outcome of care and accessibility as most important in evaluating overall satisfaction. We suggest that perception of high-quality medical care can be obtained during conflict conditions. Interestingly, in the conflict setting, the physical environment of the clinics appears to be less crucial to patient satisfaction than physician availability and medical outcome. These results may serve as a basis for changing health delivery systems by health policy makers.

Primary care clinic size and patient satisfaction in a military setting.

Patient satisfaction is a fundamental parameter of quality in health care. Identification of aspects of care that influence patient satisfaction may be used to design changes in health delivery systems, thus improving quality of care. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between the patient's assessment of quality of health care and the size of primary care clinics (PCCs) (measured as number of monthly patient visits) as well as the physician workload (measured as number of visits per physician per month). This study was a cross-sectional study using PCCs' characteristics and patient satisfaction surveys. One hundred one PCCs were evaluated. There was a negative correlation between all satisfaction indices and the number of primary care physicians in the clinic and the number of monthly visits to the clinic. In contrast, there was no significant correlation between the actual workload per physician. In general linear models, clinic size correlated significantly and negatively with patient satisfaction even after correction for other factors. The study concluded that patient satisfaction in the medical settings of the Israel Defense Forces is adversely affected by large clinic size but is not affected by physician workload.