Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster.

The objective of this article is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients with herpes zoster (HZ) that take into account clinical efficacy, adverse effects, impact on quality of life, and costs of treatment. Systematic literature reviews, published randomized clinical trials, existing guidelines, and the authors' clinical and research experience relevant to the management of patients with HZ were reviewed at a consensus meeting. The results of controlled trials and the clinical experience of the authors support the use of acyclovir, brivudin (where available), famciclovir, and valacyclovir as first-line antiviral therapy for the treatment of patients with HZ. Specific recommendations for the use of these medications are provided. In addition, suggestions are made for treatments that, when used in combination with antiviral therapy, may further reduce pain and other complications of HZ.

Oral brivudin in comparison with acyclovir for improved therapy of herpes zoster in immunocompetent patients: results of a randomized, double-blind, multicentered study.

Brivudin [(E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-2'-deoxyuridine] is a nucleoside analogue with a high and selective antiviral activity against varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). The double-blind, randomized study presented here compared efficacy and safety of oral brivudin 1 x 125 mg and acyclovir 5 x 800 mg, both for 7 days, in 1227 immunocompetent patients with herpes zoster. Main results were as follows: brivudin was superior to acyclovir in accelerating the "time to last formation of new vesicles" (primary parameter; risk ratio(ITT): 1.13, P=0.014). Equivalent effects of brivudin and acyclovir were observed for the secondary parameters "time to first crust" (RR(ITT): 0.93, P=0.004), "time to full crusting" (risk ratio(ITT): 1.03, P<0.001), and "time to loss of crusts" (RR(ITT): 0.95, P=0.002). The incidence of potentially treatment-related adverse events was similar under brivudin (7.7%) and acyclovir (10.0%). In conclusion, brivudin proved to be more effective than acyclovir in terminating vesicle formation, the parameter which reflects the end of viral replication, thus confirming, in the clinical setting, the greater in vitro antiviral activity of brivudin. Compared with acyclovir, brivudin provides a similar safety profile and a significant improvement in efficacy.

Oral brivudin in comparison with acyclovir for herpes zoster: a survey study on postherpetic neuralgia.

This concerns a double-blind survey study on 608 herpes zoster patients treated with 1x 125 mg oral brivudin (n=309) or 5x 800 mg acyclovir (n=299), both for 7 days, during two prospective, randomised clinical herpes zoster trials. The survey aimed at evaluating the outcome of the two treatment regimens on postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). During a follow-up ranging from 8 to 17 months after start of treatment, former study participants aged >/=50 years were interviewed for the occurrence of PHN. Neither the investigators nor the patients were aware of which treatment the patients received during acute herpes zoster. The incidence of PHN, defined as zoster-associated pain occurring or persisting after rash healing was significantly lower in brivudin recipients (32.7%) than in acyclovir recipients (43.5%, P=0.006). Mean duration of PHN was similar with brivudin (173 days) and acyclovir (164 days, P=0.270). Despite some methodological disadvantages common to this type of study, the present survey provides for the first evidence that brivudin treatment during acute herpes zoster favourably affects the incidence of PHN in immunocompetent elderly herpes zoster patients.