Index cost comparison of laparoscopic vs robotic surgery in colon and rectal cancer resection: a retrospective financial investigation of surgical methodology innovation at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Robotic assisted colorectal cancer resection (R-CR) has become increasingly commonplace in contrast to traditional laparoscopic cancer resection (L-CR). The aim of this study was to compare the total direct costs of R-CR to that of L-CR and to compare the groups with respect to costs related to LOS. METHODS: Patients who underwent colon and/or rectal cancer resection via R-CR or L-CR instrumentation between January 1, 2015 and December 31 2018, at our institution, were evaluated and compared. Primary outcomes were overall cost, supply cost, operating time and cost, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and postoperative LOS cost. Secondary outcomes were readmission within 30 days and mortality during the surgery. RESULTS: Two hundred forty R-CR (mean age 64.9 ± 12.4 years) and 258 L-CR (mean age 66.4 ± 15.5 years) patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall mean direct cost between R-CR and L-CR was significantly higher ($8756 vs $7776 respectively, p=0.001) as well as the supply cost per case ($3789 vs $2122, p < 0.001). Operating time was also higher for R-CR than L-CR (224 min vs 187 min, p = 0.066) but LOS was slightly lower (5.08 days vs 5.55 days, p = 0.113). CONCLUSIONS: Cost is the main obstacle to easy and widespread use of the platform at this junction, though new developments and competition could very well reduce costs. Supply cost was the main reason for increased costs with robotic resection.

Randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of effect of nitroglycerin ointment on pain after hemorrhoidectomy.

PURPOSE: Fissure-in-ano is characterized by pain, bleeding, and internal anal sphincter hypertonicity. Spasm of the internal sphincter also plays a role in hemorrhoidal disease and may be a source of anal pain after hemorrhoid surgery. Inducing sphincter relaxation with a nitroglycerin ointment has shown promise in healing anal fissures and relieving symptoms of pain. Our study attempts to test the hypothesis that topical nitroglycerin applied to the perianal region is beneficial in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: After hemorrhoidectomy 39 patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.2 percent nitroglycerin ointment (n = 19) or placebo (n = 20). Ointments were applied to the perianal region three times daily for seven days. Patients were prescribed hydrocodone bitartrate to take as needed. Visual analog scales were used to measure postoperative pain intensity and ointment benefits. Patients completed questionnaires to record medication morbidity and number of prescribed or nonprescribed medications taken. RESULTS: Patients using nitroglycerin had less pain and greater benefit from ointment than those did in the placebo group, but differences were not significant. Narcotic use was higher in the placebo group when considered on a daily basis, but was statistically significant on the second postoperative day only (P < 0.05). Morbidity from ointment application was significantly higher in the nitroglycerin group (P < 0.002) and included a headache in 8 of 19 patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen were not prescribed, but were taken more frequently in nitroglycerin patients (P < 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Perianal application of 0.2 percent nitroglycerin ointment after hemorrhoidectomy significantly reduced narcotic requirements on the second postoperative day. Headaches and a subsequent need for nonnarcotic medications may limit benefits of nitroglycerin.

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults 55 years and older: a twenty-year experience.

The nonoperative management of splenic injury secondary to blunt trauma in older patients remains controversial. We have reviewed our experience from January 1978 to December 1997 with selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults 55 years and older. Criteria for nonoperative management included hemodynamic stability with any transient hypotension corrected using less than 2,000 cm3 crystalloid infusion, a negative abdominal physical examination ruling out associated injuries, and a blood transfusion requirement of no more than 2 units attributable to the splenic injury. During the study period, 18 patients over age 55 with radiographic confirmation of a splenic injury met the above criteria for nonoperative management. Their mean age was 72 years (range 56-86), and 13 of the 18 were female (72%). The mean Injury Severity Score was 15 (range 4-29), with the mechanism of injury equally divided between automobile crashes (9) and falls (9). During a similar time period, 15 patients 55 years or older with splenic injury composed an operative group; these patients did not differ with respect to age (mean 68 years), sex (60% female), or mechanism of injury. CT scans of 8 patients managed nonoperatively were available and graded using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification, with a mean score of 2.3 (range 2-3). Eight of the 18 nonsurgical patients received blood transfusions. None of the 18 patients who met the criteria for nonoperative management "failed" the protocol, and none were taken to the operating room for abdominal exploration. Two patients (11%) died of associated thoracic injuries after lengthy hospital stays, one at 10 days and one at 24 days. We conclude from our data that nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in patients age 55 years and older is indicated provided they are hemodynamically stable, do not require significant blood transfusion, and have no other associated abdominal injuries.

Is total colonic evaluation for anal cancer necessary?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity of total colonic evaluation in patients diagnosed with anal cancer. We reviewed the cases of 69 patients treated for neoplasm of the anus from January 1973 through November 1998. Patients underwent a barium enema, flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy; findings from these procedures were analyzed. Anal pathology included: squamous cell carcinoma, 48 patients (72%); adenocarcinoma, 6 patients (9%); and squamous cell carcinoma in situ, 10 patients (15%). Chemoradiation was completed in 41 patients (61%), and 6 patients (9%) underwent abdominal perineal resection. Wide excision was the primary therapy in 15 patients (22%). Procedures included: colonoscopy, 31 patients (46%); flexible sigmoidoscopy only, 15 patients (22%); barium enema only, 3 patients (5%); and a combination of flexible sigmoidoscopy and barium enema, 18 patients (27%). Eighty-five per cent of patients had a normal colonic evaluation. Ten patients (15%) had single or multiple polyps identified. Six adenomatous polyps and two hyperplastic polyps were found. No synchronous colorectal malignancy was identified. We conclude that colonoscopy is an integral part of colonic surveillance in patients diagnosed with anal carcinoma, but our study fails to find evidence to support such intervention. The standard screening recommendation for colorectal cancer based on age and risk factors is appropriate intervention for patients diagnosed with anal cancer; anal cancer itself does not appear to be one of these risk factors.