Successful Surgical Treatment of a Recurrent Pelvic Solitary Fibrous Tumor of Uterine Origin Accompanied by Doege-Potter Syndrome: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Solitary fibrous tumors (SFT), rare soft-tissue neoplasms, are usually found in the thoracic cavity, and a uterine origin is extremely rare. SFTs with insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) production induce non-islet cell tumor-induced hypoglycemia (NICTH), referred to as Doege-Potter syndrome. CASE REPORT A 70-year-old woman presented with urinary retention, and imaging revealed a huge mass occupying almost the entire pelvic space. She had a history of hysterectomy for leiomyoma of the uterus 7 years earlier. In her present course, she developed hypoglycemia, and NICTH was suspected. Her previous uterine specimen was reexamined, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed the specimen to be CD34-positive and alpha-smooth muscle actin-negative, indicating that the uterine specimen was not leiomyoma but SFT. Therefore, the present pelvic tumor was considered to be a recurrence of SFT with NICTH, namely Doege-Potter syndrome. Surgical resection was performed, and the pathological examination showed the same histologic features as the previous uterine specimen, while IHC revealed the present specimen to be positive for CD34, signal transducers and activator of transcription 6, and IGF-II, consistent with the diagnosis of recurrent SFT with IGF-II production. The patient's hypoglycemia improved after tumor resection. To confirm the IGF-II secretion from the SFT, we conducted immunoblotting of the patient's perioperative serum, with results showing that the strong band of IGF-II in the preoperative serum disappeared after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Because SFTs, especially those with Doege-Potter syndrome, often recur, sometimes with a very long interval, long-term cautious surveillance is required, even after complete tumor resection.

Lower bone mineral density and higher bone resorption marker levels in premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes in Japan.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Type 1 diabetes is associated with poorer bone quality. Quantitative ultrasound provides an estimate of bone mineral density (BMD) and can also be used to evaluate bone quality, which is associated with an increased fracture risk in people with type 1 diabetes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between menopausal status and a bone turnover marker with heel BMD using quantitative ultrasound in women with type 1 diabetes and age- and body mass index-matched controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 124 individuals recruited in Kyoto and Osaka, Japan - 62 women with type 1 diabetes (mean age 47.2 ± 17.3 years) and 62 age-, menopausal status-, sex- and body mass index-matched non-diabetic control individuals (mean age 47.3 ± 16.3 years) - were enrolled in this study. Heel BMD in the calcaneus was evaluated using ultrasonography (AOS-100NW, Hitachi-Aloka Medical, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). A bone turnover marker was also measured. RESULTS: The heel BMD Z-score was significantly lower in premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes than in the premenopausal control group, but not in postmenopausal women with type 1 diabetes. Levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b, a bone resorption marker, were significantly higher in premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes than in the premenopausal control group, but not in postmenopausal women with type 1 diabetes. The whole parathyroid hormone level was significantly lower in both pre- and postmenopausal women with type 1 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Lower heel BMD, higher tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b level and lower parathyroid hormone were observed in premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes. Premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes require osteoporosis precautions for postmenopause.

Predictive Factors of the Adherence to Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: A Prospective Observational Study (PARCS STUDY).

BACKGROUND: Information about factors related to better adherence to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor adherence is quite limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six participants with type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) without CGM were recruited. The participants' characteristics and diabetes-related quality of life (QOL) were evaluated at baseline and one year after starting to use CGM. Participants wearing the sensor for ≥60% of the time were considered as adherent. RESULTS: The mean age of the 46 participants was 44.1 ± 15.0 years old and the mean glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) was 7.7 ± 1.0%; 60.9% of the participants were classified as adherent. The duration of using CSII was longer in the adherent group, and the degree of diabetic retinopathy was significantly different. There were no significant differences in age, frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose, or Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS-B for behavior, HFS-W for worry) score at baseline between the adherent and nonadherent groups. The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) score at baseline was significantly higher and the total CSII-QOL score at baseline was significantly lower in the adherent group. The usage of dual-wave bolus was significantly increased in the adherent group (34.6%-61.5%, P = .016), but not in the nonadherent group (33.3%-33.3%, P > .999). The HbA1c level showed a significant improvement in the adherent group (7.8%-7.3%, P < .001), but not in the nonadherent group (7.5%-7.2%, P = .102). CONCLUSIONS: Higher adherence to CGM sensors may be associated with a heavier emotional burden of diabetes and a worse QOL in relation to CSII at baseline.

Development and Validation of the Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion-Related Quality-of-Life (CSII-QOL) Scale.

Background: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is associated with improved glycemic control, a reduced incidence of hypoglycemia, and improved quality of life (QOL). To date, however, there has been no QOL scale specific to CSII. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a scale to measure CSII-QOL for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: A total of 50 people with T1D aged ≥15 years who used CSII (28% males; age, 47.6 ± 17.0 years; duration of diabetes, 14.7 ± 9.7 years; duration of CSII use, 6.1 ± 3.3 years; HbA1c, 7.4% ± 0.8%) took part in the CSII-QOL study. Twenty-eight potential CSII-QOL items were developed in a combined approach consisting of semistructured patient interviews, expert input, and a literature search. The resulting CSII-QOL was tested for factor analysis, validity, reliability, and influencing factors. Results: The final 25-item questionnaire had a 3-domain structure ("convenience," "social restriction," and "psychological problems"), high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.870), and substantial test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.65). The CSII-QOL score was correlated negatively with the Problem Areas in Diabetes score. Conclusion: The CSII-QOL is the first CSII-related QOL scale for people with T1D. This short, validated, and reliable instrument might potentially be useful in future clinical studies and routine clinical patient care. Further validation is required to confirm these issues because of the small and potentially biased sample (UMIN-CTR: UMIN000031595).

The Effect of High-concentration Insulin Glarigine on the Quality of Life of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pre-post Study (HIGH-QOL STUDY).

Objective We compared the pain accompanying the injection of high-concentration (300 units/mL) insulin glargine (U300G) with that accompanying the injection of conventional (100 units/mL) insulin glargine (U100G). Methods U100G was switched to U300G at basically the same dosage. Visual analog scales were used to assess the quality of life (QOL). The primary outcome was the change in the pain accompanying injections in those using ≥30 units of U100G compared with those using <30 units at baseline. Standardized mean differences (Cohen's d) were used to measure the effect size. Patients Adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using U100G. Results One hundred and eight patients were recruited. The numbers of patients who used U100G at ≥30 units, 20 to <30 units, 10 to <20 units, and <10 units were 13, 14, 34, and 47, respectively. The improvement in the pain score was not significant for ≥30 units compared with <30 units (-50.3±24.0 vs. -40.4±28.5, p=0.25, d=0.38), but a significant difference was observed for ≥20 units compared with <20 units (-50.8±22.7 vs. -38.4±29.1, p=0.03, d=0.48), as well as for ≥10 units compared with <10 units (-48.1±25.0 vs. -33.0±29.7, p<0.01, d=0.56). When all patients were analyzed together, significant improvements in the pain score (-41.5±28.0, p<0.01), ease of use score (-37.5±32.2, p<0.01), force needed to inject score (-46.5±28.6, p<0.01), and preference for U300G compared with U100G score (-45.8±33.1, p<0.01) were observed. Conclusion There is possibility that switching from U100G to U300G might be associated with better QOL for patients who require insulin glargine injections. To prove this hypothesis, a randomized controlled trial (preferably double-blinded) will be required in the future.

Diagnostic accuracy of the anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody in type 1 diabetes mellitus: Comparison between radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The distributer of the anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody assay kit using radioimmunoassay (RIA) recently announced its discontinuation, and proposed an alternative kit using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The aim of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic values of the anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody by RIA and ELISA among type 1 diabetes mellitus patients and control participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 79 type 1 diabetes mellitus patients and 79 age-matched controls were enrolled and assessed using RIA and ELISA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values were calculated for cut-off values (RIA = 1.5 U/mL and ELISA = 5.0 U/mL, respectively). Kappa coefficients were used to test for agreements between the RIA and ELISA methods regarding the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for diagnosing type 1 diabetes mellitus were 57.0, 97.5, 95.7, and 69.4% by RIA, and 60.8, 100.0, 100.0 and 71.8% by ELISA, respectively. The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus using the RIA and ELISA methods showed substantial agreement with the kappa values of 0.74 for all participants, and of 0.64 for the acute type; however, there was moderate agreement with the kappa value of 0.56 for the slowly progressive type. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that both anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody by RIA and ELISA was useful for diagnosing type 1 diabetes mellitus. However, in the slowly progressive type, the degree of agreement of these two kits was poorer compared with those in all participants or in the acute type.