Risks of malignancies among patients with psoriasis: A cohort study of 360 patients.

Psoriasis is a systemic, chronic, immunologically-mediated disease affecting approximately 2%-4% of the worldwide population. It is well known that psoriasis is associated with several comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy. Although meta-analyses and large prospective cohort studies have shown an increased risk of malignancies in patients with psoriasis worldwide, an association between psoriasis and malignancy onset has not yet been established in Japan. We retrospectively analyzed 360 patients with psoriasis at our hospital to evaluate the incidence and types of malignancies in these patients. The incidence rate of malignancy was 14.4% (52/360). Colorectal cancer was the most commonly associated malignancy (20.9%), followed by skin cancer (16.4%), gastric cancer (10.4%), and lung cancer (10.4%). The calculated age- and sex-standardized incidence ratio of malignancies was 1.235 (95% CI 0.952-1.601) which indicated that the malignancy rate was higher in patients with psoriasis than in the general population, although the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis revealed increased risk of malignancy in males (HR = 3.15; 95% CI 1.381-7.187; p < 0.001), psoriasis onset at older age (HR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.058-1.111; p < 0.01), and psoriatic erythroderma (HR = 4.44; 95% CI 1.354-14.581; p < 0.05). We also observed that treatment with biological agents tends to reduce the risk of developing malignancy; however, no statistical significance was found. These results suggest that periodic screening for malignancy should be recommended in patients with psoriasis having these risk factors and in those with poorly controlled psoriatic inflammation.

Efficacy and safety of apremilast and phototherapy versus phototherapy only in psoriasis vulgaris.

Phototherapy and apremilast (oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor) are well-known in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris. However, current evidence on the efficacy and safety of their combination is not sufficient. This multicenter, randomized controlled study compared the efficacy and safety between phototherapy as monotherapy and phototherapy and apremilast as combination therapy in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Patients with moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris were assigned to combination (n = 29) and monotherapy (n = 13) groups. All patients underwent an 8-week phototherapy regimen comprising irradiation with narrowband UV-B. The patients in the combination group were also administered 10 mg to 60 mg of oral apremilast. We evaluated the improvement percentage based on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline to week 8. Additionally, we evaluated the percentage of patients who achieved ≥75% improvement; changes in body surface area (BSA) and scores of EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-level, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and visual analog scale for pruritis from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks; and adverse events. Compared with the monotherapy group, the combination group had significantly lower PASI scores at 4 and 8 weeks and more patients who achieved a PASI score improvement of ≥75% at 8 weeks. Both groups exhibited a significant decrease in BSA; at 8 weeks, no significant difference was observed between the two groups, although the combination group tended toward a greater reduction in BSA. The intergroup differences in the changes at the three time points were not significant. Adverse events were more frequent in the combination group than in the monotherapy group. Our findings suggest that an 8-week combined apremilast and phototherapy regimen may not be adequate in patients for improvements in their subjective assessment of psoriasis, and longer treatment periods may be necessary.

Distinguishing nitrogen-containing sites in SiO2/4H-SiC(0001) after nitric oxide annealing by X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

The atomic structure of nitrogen at the SiO2/4H-SiC(0001) interface has been investigated using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) in two nitric oxide annealed samples, one of which was oxidized in dry O2 (NO-POA) prior to the experiment. The peak shapes and energies of the observed and simulated spectra are in agreement and indicate that the N-containing sites could be the substitutional C site at the interface for the NO-annealed sample and the interstitial site in the interior of SiC for the NO-POA-annealed sample. XAS analysis distinguished between the N-containing sites at the SiO2/SiC interface.

Validation study of the in vitro skin irritation test with the LabCyte EPI-MODEL24.

A validation study on an in vitro skin irritation assay was performed with the reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) LabCyte EPI-MODEL24, developed by Japan Tissue Engineering Co. Ltd (Gamagori, Japan). The protocol that was followed in the current study was an optimised version of the EpiSkin protocol (LabCyte assay). According to the United Nations Globally Harmonised System (UN GHS) of classification for assessing the skin irritation potential of a chemical, 12 irritants and 13 non-irritants were validated by a minimum of six laboratories from the Japanese Society for Alternatives to Animal Experiments (JSAAE) skin irritation assay validation study management team (VMT). The 25 chemicals were listed in the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) performance standards. The reconstructed tissues were exposed to the chemicals for 15 minutes and incubated for 42 hours in fresh culture medium. Subsequently, the level of interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 α) present in the conditioned medium was measured, and tissue viability was assessed by using the MTT assay. The results of the MTT assay obtained with the LabCyte EPI-MODEL24 (LabCyte MTT assay) demonstrated high within-laboratory and between-laboratory reproducibility, as well as high accuracy for use as a stand-alone assay to distinguish skin irritants from non-irritants. In addition, the IL-1α release measurements in the LabCyte assay were clearly unnecessary for the success of this model in the classification of chemicals for skin irritation potential.