Flexible and rigid cystoscopy in women.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have evaluated the tolerability of rigid versus flexible cystoscopy in men. Similar studies, however, have not been performed in women. We sought to determine whether office-based flexible cystoscopy was better tolerated than rigid cystoscopy in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following full IRB approval, women were prospectively randomized in a single-blind manner. Patients were randomized to flexible or rigid cystoscopy and draped in the lithotomy position to maintain blinding of the study. Questionnaires evaluated discomfort before, during, and after cystoscopy. RESULTS: Thirty-six women were randomized to flexible (18) or rigid (18) cystoscopy. Indications were surveillance (16), hematuria (15), recurrent UTIs (2), voiding dysfunction (1), and other (2). All questionnaires were returned by 31/36 women. Using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), median discomfort during the procedure for flexible and rigid cystoscopy were 1.4 and 1.8, respectively, in patients perceiving pain. Median recalled pain 1 week later was similar at 0.8 and 1.15, respectively. None of these differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible and rigid cystoscopy are well tolerated in women. Discomfort during and after the procedure is minimal in both groups. Urologists should perform either procedure in women based on their preference and skill level.

Examination of laparoscopic retrieval bag washings for malignant cells after hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and intact specimen removal.

OBJECTIVES: Port site metastases after hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy have been described in the literature. There is no uniform agreement among urologists regarding the use of a retrieval bag before intact specimen removal. The aim of this study was to determine whether LapSac renal extraction bag washings contain malignant cells. METHODS: We prospectively obtained washings from the LapSac retrieval bag after hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and intact specimen removal for renal cell carcinoma. In 30 consecutive cases, after removal of the kidney specimen from the LapSac, the LapSac was irrigated with 50 mL sterile Hank's balanced salt solution. These washings were sent for cytologic examination. Cytologic evaluation was performed with a Thin Prep and the Papanicolaou method. RESULTS: We performed 30 hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomies for suspected renal cell carcinoma with the above protocol. One specimen was benign and one showed transitional cell carcinoma; these were excluded from the study. Six specimens were stage T1a, 17 were T1b, 1 was T2, 2 were T3a, and 2 were T3b. Histopathology revealed 27 specimens with clear cell renal cell carcinomas with Fuhrman grades from 1 to 4; 1 specimen showed chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Margins were negative in all cases, and there were no gross or microscopic tumor violations. The cytologic results from 27 cases were negative and in 1 case with T3b renal cell carcinoma the LapSac washings were positive for malignant cells. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary findings from our study show that low-stage, low-grade tumors removed laparoscopically with minimal manipulation do not exfoliate cells into their LapSac retrieval bags.

Pneumothorax in pediatric patients after urological laparoscopic surgery: experience with 4 patients.

PURPOSE: Pneumothorax is a rare but known complication of adult urological laparoscopic surgery and has been described occasionally in children as well. The etiologies for pneumothorax during such procedures are discussed as is the management of pneumothorax in this setting. We investigate the occurrence of pneumothorax during laparoscopic pediatric urological procedures in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pneumothorax developed during urological laparoscopic procedures in 4 pediatric patients (3 females, 1 male). Patient age ranged from 8 months to 11 years (mean 5.4 years). Laparoscopic surgical procedures performed included right upper pole partial nephrectomy, left upper pole partial nephroureterectomy, removal of left multicystic dysplastic kidney and bilateral Cohen reimplantation of ureters. Procedures were performed with a maximum insufflation pressure of 15 mm Hg. During the same time period as these four cases, a total of 285 laparoscopic urologic procedures were performed at our institution. RESULTS: Pneumothorax was suspected due to decreased oxygen saturations, subcutaneous emphysema, increased respiratory effort and decreased chest lung sounds unilaterally. Pneumothorax was confirmed with chest x-rays. Operative time ranged from 171 to 249 minutes (mean 199.5). Duration of surgery before pneumothorax developed ranged from 75 to 239 minutes (mean 176, median 168). Conservative management of pneumothorax was used in 3 patients and a pigtail chest tube was used in 1. In all cases the estimated blood loss was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists performing laparoscopy in children should be aware of the possibility of a pneumothorax developing during the procedure. Evaluation for decrease in O2 saturation should include a search for pneumothorax in these patients. Close observation generally suffices for management.

Variables in successful repair of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery.

PURPOSE: We evaluate variables affecting the success of repairs of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 123 boys who underwent fistula repair at Primary Children's Medical Center were reviewed. Of these patients 100 underwent initial fistula repair at our center (surgery was performed at our center in 82 and elsewhere in 18) and 23 were referred from elsewhere after unsuccessful fistula repairs. Patient age was 6 months to 34 years (median 3.21 years) and interval between surgeries was 3.7 months to 12 years (median 12.6 months). Several variables potentially affecting the success of fistula closure were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: Including those patients referred from outside hospitals, fistulas were successfully closed in 71%, 72%, 77%, 100% and 100% of these patients after fistula repairs 1 to 5, respectively. Variables studied yielded stent 67.7% (36 of 54 cases) versus no stent 76.1% (35 of 46) and operating microscope 70.4% (59 of 71) versus loupes 72.4% (21 of 29) in terms of success. Success based on patient age yielded 65.5% for younger than 2 years (n = 29 patients), 71.7% for 2 to 5 (46), 64.7% for 6 to 12 (17) and 87.5% for older than 12 (8). When considering the type of original hypospadias repair and its affect on fistula closure success, a significantly lower success was noted with Yoke and King procedures (p = 0.007 and 0.037, respectively). In patients who underwent hypospadias surgery and all subsequent fistula closure attempts at our center, fistulas were successfully repaired in 72%, 67% and 100% of patients after attempts 1 to 3, respectively. Initial fistula repair was successful in 72% (59 of 82) of patients who underwent original hypospadias surgery at our center and in 67% (12 of 18) of those referred after hypospadias surgery at an outside hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding urethrocutaneous fistula closure, the data from this study suggest that there is no clear difference in stent versus no stent and microscope versus loupes, age at fistula closure does not affect success, type of original hypospadias procedure may influence success (King and Yoke procedures were least successful), success rate is not negatively impacted in recurrent fistula cases, given a diverse group of fistulas, success of fistula repair for attempts 1 to 5 was 71%, 72%, 77%, 100% and 100%, respectively, and success rate in a tertiary pediatric urology setting is not influenced by whether the original hypospadias procedure or initial fistula closure was performed in the pediatric urology setting versus outside hospital.