Previous Knee Surgery, Anteromedial Portal Drilling, Quadriceps Tendon Autograft, and Meniscal Involvement Associated With Delayed Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Amateur Athletes.

Purpose: To identify prognostic factors associated with a delayed return-to-sport (RTS) time in amateur athletes who return to full participation after a primary isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review was performed among athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction between October 2014 and October 2021. Inclusion criteria were any amateur athletes with an ACL reconstruction who had a documented RTS and greater than 1-year follow-up. Nonathletes, those with multiligamentous knee injury, and those missing documented RTS timelines were excluded. RTS was defined as participation in athletics at a level equivalent to or greater than the preinjury level participation. Demographic and prognostic factors, including previous knee surgery, meniscal involvement, level of participation, surgical approach, and graft type, were recorded along with RTS time and analyzed via Poisson regression. Results: In total, 91 athletes, average age 18.8 (± 6.7) years, who underwent ACL reconstruction at a single institution from 2014 to 2021 were identified with an average follow-up time of 4.6 (± 2.5) years (range 1.1, 9.0). Meniscal involvement (1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.15, P < .001) and previous knee surgery (1.43; 95% CI 1.29-1.58; P < .001) were related to a delayed RTS. Quadriceps tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts, as well as allograft, showed a significant association with a longer RTS time when compared with hamstring autograft (1.16, 95% CI 1.13-1.20, P < .001; 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, P = .020; 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19, P = .004, respectively), as did anteromedial portal drilling, when compared with the outside in approach for femoral drilling (1.19, 95% CI 1.16-1.23, P < .001). Conclusions: Previous knee surgery, anteromedial femoral drilling, quadriceps tendon autograft, and meniscus tear were most associated with a delayed timeline for RTS among young athletes who were able to return. Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic case series.

Editorial Commentary: The Shoulder Instability-Return to Sports After Injury Scale Is More Than Just a Psychological Readiness Tool-It Is a Potential Predictive Model for Outcomes and Recurrence.

The Shoulder Instability-Return to Sports After Injury (SIRSI) scale is a useful psychological readiness tool to determine whether athletes are prepared to return to sport. Although questions remain on the optimal timing of survey administration based on the type of procedure (i.e., arthroscopic Bankart repair vs Latarjet procedure) and external factors contributing to psychological readiness, its current use begs the question of what other applications may be appropriate. The SIRSI scale has recently been able to effectively predict patient-reported and clinical outcomes, such as postoperative instability recurrence. However, it also may have added value as a serial screening tool for determining a safe return to preinjury activity rather than just serving as a harbinger of further negative outcomes after shoulder stabilization. Increasingly, we must recognize the fundamental limitations in our current rehabilitation pathways and sometimes myopic, 1-dimensional return-to-play criteria (e.g., range of motion or isokinetic testing) in facilitating a safe return to competition. We must transition to a more regimented, criteria-based return-to-play battery that incorporates optimized psychological readiness. As such, the SIRSI scale, like its anterior cruciate ligament counterpart, could become the standard of care in determining confidence in returning to sport and ultimately serve as a benchmark of surgical success.

Rates and predictors of reimplantation of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation following first stage cartilage harvest: A cohort study.

PURPOSE: To assess the reimplantation rate and predictors of patients requiring second-staged matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) reimplantation after initial first stage cartilage biopsy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from 2018 to 2022 among patients who underwent only phase I MACI biopsy procedure (biopsy group) or both phase I with transition to phase II implantation of chondrocytes (implantation group) at a single tertiary center. Demographic, qualitative, and quantitative measurements were recorded, and univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of ultimately requiring second stage MACI implantation. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients (51% female, age 27.7 ± 10.6 years (range 12-50)) were included in this study. Eventually, 25 of 71 patients (35.2%) experienced persistence of symptoms after initial MACI biopsy and other concomitant procedures, requiring second-stage implantation. Univariate analysis showed the implantation group compared to the biopsy group had a greater lesion size (5.2 cm2 ± 3.3 vs. 3.3 cm2 ± 1.4, p = 0.024), a higher proportion patients ≥ 26 years of age (76% vs. 43%, p = 0.009), a medial femoral condyle lesion more commonly (33% vs 11%, p = 0.005), were more often female (72% vs. 39%, p = 0.008), and had less often soft tissue repair at time of biopsy (32% vs. 61%, p = 0.020). Backward multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that size of the lesion (OR 1.43, p = 0.031) and age ≥ 26 years old at time of biopsy (OR 3.55, p = 0.042) were independent predictors of not responding to initial surgery and requiring implantation surgery. CONCLUSION: This study found that 35% of patients undergoing MACI phase I biopsy harvest eventually required autologous implantation. Independent risk factors for progressing to implantation after failed initial surgery were larger defect size and older age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Cohort Study.

A biomechanical study to optimize superior capsular reconstruction operative technique.

Background: The goals of this study were to optimize superior capsular reconstruction by assessing the relative fixation strength of 4 suture anchors; evaluating 3 glenoid neck locations for fixation strength and bone mineral density (BMD); determining if there is a correlation between BMD and fixation strength; and determining which portal sites have optimal access to the posterosuperior and anterosuperior glenoid neck for anchor placement. Methods: Twenty cadaveric specimens were randomized into 4 groups: all-suture anchor (FiberTak), conventional 3.0-mm knotless suture anchor (SutureTak), 3.9-mm knotless PEEK (polyetheretherketone) Corkscrew anchor, and 4.5-mm Bio-Corkscrew anchor. Each specimen was prepared with 3 anchors into the glenoid: an anterosuperior anchor, superior anchor, and posterosuperior anchor. All anchors were inserted into the superior glenoid neck 5 mm from the glenoid rim. A materials testing system performed cyclic testing (250 cycles) followed by load-to-failure testing at 12.5 mm/s. Cyclic elongation, first cycle excursion, maximum load, and stiffness were recorded. Using custom software, BMD was calculated at each anchor location. This software was also used to assess access to the posterosuperior and anterosuperior glenoid neck from standard arthroscopic portal positions. Results: There was no significant difference in cyclic elongation (P = .546), first cycle excursion (P = .476), maximum load (P = .817), or stiffness (P = .309) among glenoid anchor positions. Cyclic elongation was significantly longer in the PEEK Corkscrew group relative to the other implants (P ≤ .002). First cycle excursion was significantly greater in the FiberTak group relative to all other implants (P ≤ .008). For load-to-failure testing, the Bio-Corkscrew group achieved the highest maximum load (P ≤ .001). No other differences in cyclic or failure testing were observed between the groups. No differences in stiffness testing were observed (P = .133). The superior glenoid rim had the greatest BMD (P = .003), but there was no correlation between BMD and cyclic/load outcomes. The posterior portal (80% of specimens) and the anterior portal (60% of specimens) demonstrated the best access to the posterosuperior and anterosuperior glenoid neck, respectively. Conclusion: The 4.5-mm Bio-Corkscrew anchor provided the most robust fixation to the glenoid during superior capsular reconstruction as it demonstrated the strongest maximum load, had minimal elongation, had minimal first cycle excursion, and did not fail during cyclic testing. The superior glenoid neck had the highest BMD; however, there was no correlation between BMD or glenoid anchor location and biomechanical outcomes. The posterior portal and anterior portal provided optimal access to the posterosuperior glenoid neck and anterosuperior glenoid neck, respectively.

Arthroscopic suture bridge fixation for acute bony Bankart with anterior glenohumeral instability: a case report and narrative review.

Background and Objective: Anterior shoulder dislocations can result in acute glenoid rim fractures that compromise the bony stability of the glenohumeral joint. Adequate fixation of these fractures is required to restore stability, decrease shoulder pain, and facilitate return to activity. The double-row suture bridge is a relatively novel fixation technique, first described in 2009, that accomplishes internal fixation with sufficient stability using an all-arthroscopic technique to restore the glenoid footprint. A 40-year-old female with recurrent anterior shoulder instability in the setting of seizure disorder was found to have a bony Bankart lesion of 25% to 30% with a concomitant superior labral tear. The patient was treated with a double-row bony Bankart bridge and labral repair. At six months follow-up, she has progressed to a full recovery with no recurrence. Methods: A search was conducted in May 2023 in PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL with the search terms bony Bankart, bone Bankart, osseous Bankart, acute, bridge, suture bridge, double row. Key Content and Findings: Double-row suture bridge repairs result in improvement in shoulder function as determined by ASES (93.5), QuickDASH (4.5), SANE (95.9), and SF-12 (55.6). The overall recurrence rate of anterior instability after a bony Bankart bridge repair is 8%. When examining the return to prior level of function, 81.4% of patients were able to do so with only 7.9% of patients reporting significant modifications to their activity level. In mid-term results, double row suture bridge demonstrates similar outcomes to other all-arthroscopic fixation methods of bony Bankart injuries. Importantly, bony Bankart bridge remains a viable option for critical glenoid lesions over the 20% cutoff used in other all arthroscopic techniques. Biomechanically, the double-row suture bridge offers distinct benefits over its single-row counterpart including increased compression, reduced displacement, and reduced step-off. Conclusions: Although there is limited data, the studies discussed and the demonstrative case show the potential benefit of all-arthroscopic double-row suture bridge fixation including increased compression, decreased displacement, and a lower complication rate in patients with large bony Bankart lesions traditionally requiring bony augmentation. However, more robust studies are necessary to determine the long-term success of the double-row suture bridge.

Knotless Re-tensionable Direct Fixation of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears.

Over the past decade, there has been an increased awareness of the recognition and treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown that surgical repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears is effective in improving patient-reported outcome measures and decreasing the progression of osteoarthritis when compared with nonoperative treatment or meniscectomy. The available techniques currently consist of transosseous suture fixation and direct suture anchor fixation, with transosseous repairs being the most frequently performed. Transosseous fixation relies on indirect fixation on the anterior tibial cortex, which may predispose to gap formation at the repair site. On the other hand, suture anchor fixation is technically demanding with arthroscopic placement of the anchor perpendicular to the tibial plateau at the posterior medial root insertion. Furthermore, re-tensioning of the construct is not possible with the current techniques. In this technical note, we present a knotless re-tensionable direct fixation technique using an anterior tibial tunnel, which has the advantages of direct fixation, a rip-stop suture configuration, a reproducible surgical technique, and the possibility of re-tensioning of the repaired meniscal root.

Management of Bone Loss in Posterior Glenohumeral Shoulder Instability: Current Concepts.

¼ Posterior glenohumeral instability is relatively uncommon compared with anterior instability, but is becoming an increasingly recognized and surgically managed shoulder pathology.¼ Soft-tissue stabilization alone may not be sufficient in patients who present with substantial bone loss to the posterior glenoid and/or the anterior humeral head.¼ For posterior glenoid defects, posterior glenoid osteoarticular augmentation can be used, and posterior glenoid opening wedge osteotomy can be considered in cases of posterior instability with pathologic retroversion.¼ For humeral head lesions, several surgical treatment options are available including subscapularis transposition into the humeral head defect, autograft or allograft reconstruction, humeral rotation osteotomy, and shoulder arthroplasty.

Bioactive and Bioinductive Implants Are Increasingly Used in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine but Adequately Controlled Studies Are Needed: A Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: To describe the currently available literature reporting clinical outcomes for bioactive and bioinductive implants in sports medicine. METHODS: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of 4 databases was completed to identify eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were studies using bioactive or bioinductive implants in human clinical studies for sports medicine procedures. Data were extracted and reported in narrative form, along with study characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 145 studies were included involving 6,043 patients. The majority of included studies were level IV evidence (65.5%), and only 36 included a control group (24.8%). Bioactive materials are defined as any materials that stimulate an advantageous response from the body upon implantation, whereas bioinductive materials provide a favorable environment for a biological response initiated by the host. Bioactivity can speed healing and improve clinical outcome by improving vascularization, osteointegration, osteoinduction, tendon healing, and soft-tissue regeneration or inducing immunosuppression or preventing infection. The most common implants reported were for knee (67.6%, primarily cartilage [most commonly osteochondral defects], anterior cruciate ligament, and meniscus), shoulder (16.6%, primarily rotator cuff), or ankle (11.7%, primarily Achilles repair). The most common type of implant was synthetic (44.1%), followed by autograft (30.3%), xenograft (16.6%), and allograft (9.0%). In total, 69% of implants were standalone treatments and 31% were augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The existing bioactive and bioinductive implant literature in sports medicine is largely composed of small, low-level-of-evidence studies lacking a control group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Before bioactive implants can be adapted as a new standard of care, larger, comparative clinical outcome studies with long-term follow-up are essential.

Batter's Shoulder: All-Knotless Posterior Labral Repair With Retensionable Anchors for Treatment of Batter's Shoulder.

Batter's Shoulder is a unique injury that may be associated with recurrent microtrauma followed by acute subluxation of the humeral head on the posterior glenoid edge, leading to posterior labral tears. Early identification of this injury is critical, as it may be treated with conservative nonsurgical treatments prior to labral tear onset. If conservative treatment fails and pain persists, surgical options include arthroscopic fixation to reapproximate the posterior labrum to the glenoid and restore capsular tension. Previous studies have shown the benefit of using knotless suture anchors in arthroscopic shoulder fixation. This technical note demonstrates that Batter's Shoulder is a unique injury associated with posterior labral tears of the shoulder and provides a contemporary method of arthroscopic fixation of a posterior labral tear using retensionable knotless all-suture anchors.

Editorial Commentary: Suture-Button Fixation May Have Advantages Over Screw Fixation for Glenoid Bone Grafting Procedures for Shoulder Instability.

Orthopaedic suture buttons have been increasingly used in a variety of procedures, such as syndesmosis stabilization, coracoclavicular ligament repair, anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation, and Lisfranc injury treatment. In many instances, suture-button fixation constructs have shown equivalent, if not superior, outcomes to screw fixation. More recently, suture buttons have been suggested for osseous fixation of the coracoid during the Latarjet procedure, as well as other anterior (or posterior) bone block reconstruction of the glenoid using distal tibial allograft, tricortical iliac crest, or distal clavicle in cases of complex shoulder instability. Suture buttons offer several unique advantages, including the ability to tension and retension graft fixation, smaller driller paths with bone preservation, less osteolysis, lower risk of hardware removal, and greater ease of hardware revision and/or secondary surgery. However, certain disadvantages also exist, such as higher implant costs, less time-zero implant rigidity, technical difficulty, and, potentially, less mediolateral stability of the bone graft. Time will tell if these suture-button constructs will supplant traditional screw fixation for the Latarjet procedure in terms of clinical and cost-effectiveness.

Adding Lateral Retinacular Release to Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Fails to Demonstrate Clinical Benefit Compared With Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Purpose: To compare functional outcomes and failure rates between medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstructions with and without lateral retinacular release (LRR) at minimum 1-year follow up. Methods: A retrospective review identified consecutive patients from 2013 to 2019 at a single center who met all of the following inclusion criteria: at least 1 confirmed patellar dislocation, patellar tilt (evidenced by tight retinaculum on operative examination or patellar tilt on radiographs), underwent either MPFL reconstruction alone or combined with LRR, had available preoperative documentation and imaging, and were at least 1 year out of surgery. Patients were excluded if they had previous surgery to the ipsilateral limb or had any concomitant procedure performed. Demographics and preoperative imaging were evaluated. Failure rates and functional outcome scores were obtained including Kujala, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, International Knee Documentation Committee, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores. Clinical failure was defined as revision MPFL reconstruction on the affected knee or at least 1 instance of postoperative patellar dislocation. Results: A total of 18 patients underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction (mean follow-up = 29.3 ± 8.3 months, range = 15.1-42.8 months), and 31 underwent MPFL reconstruction combined with LRR (mean follow up = 36.0 ± 11.3 months, range = 14.0-51.9 months). At final follow-up, there were no statistical differences between the isolated MPFL and MPFL combined with LRR cohorts for any of the functional outcome scores (P > .05 for all). At the time of final follow-up, no patients who underwent isolated MPFL and 19.3% (n = 6) or patients undergoing MPFL combined with LRR experienced clinical failure (P = .073), as defined by subsequent patellar dislocation or revision MPFL reconstruction. Of these, 2 patients underwent revision MPFL reconstructions with distal tubercle transfer for borderline abnormal TT:TG (i.e., >15 mm). Conclusions: MPFL reconstruction surgery combined with LRR failed to demonstrate significantly different functional outcome scores and failure rates compared with isolated MPFL reconstruction at minimum 1-year follow up. In addition, there were no differences in rates of achieving MCID between both groups. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee.

Osteochondral injuries of the knee can be a frequent source of debilitating pain and dysfunction. Significant chondral (>1.5-2 cm2) lesions of the femoral condyles can be especially difficult to manage with nonsurgical measures. Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation has been shown to be a reliable surgical procedure to manage a wide array of high-grade focal chondral lesions, with or without subchondral bone involvement. OCA transplantation affords the transfer of a size-matched allograft of mature hyaline cartilage with its associated subchondral bony scaffold. Indications include primary or secondary management of large, high-grade chondral or osteochondral defects secondary to trauma, developmental malformation, osteonecrosis, or other focal degenerative disease. Contraindications include end-stage osteoarthritis, uncorrected malalignment, ligament or meniscus deficiency, and inflammatory joint disease. Improvements in surgical technique, allograft storage, and tissue availability have created more reproducible clinical results and increased chondrocyte viability. Long-term (>10 year) graft survival rates have been shown to be between 70% and 91%, and the procedure has been shown to be cost-effective based on cost per quality-adjusted life year. Finally, OCA transplantation has been shown to provide excellent return to play rate for athletes with medium-to-large cartilage lesions. OCA transplantation is therefore an important option in the treatment algorithm of articular cartilage injuries.

Editorial Commentary: Lower Trapezius Transfer May Be Indicated for Surgical Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears in Younger, Non-Arthritic Patients.

Although shoulder rotator cuff repair fixation constructs and suture anchor design have evolved, repair of massive or functionally irreparable tears historically has relied on tendon mobilization and compression, optimizing footprint biology, and attempting a tension-free repair. However, despite these efforts, rates of failure of complete healing may be high, ranging from 20% to 94%. This has led to a search for alternative approaches, including bridging grafts, subacromial balloons, superior capsular reconstructions, biologic tuberoplasties, bursal acromial grafts, and, ultimately, renewed interest in tendon transfers. The latissimus dorsi transfer was traditionally a preferred tendon-transfer technique for posterosuperior massive cuff tears, but inconsistent outcomes have resulted in declining popularity. Recently, the lower trapezius transfer (LTT) has gained acceptance for the treatment of posterosuperior tears, particularly with external rotation weakness and lag signs. The LTT is biomechanically superior to the latissimus dorsi transfer, offering a more native vector of pull and in-phase activation. LTT could be indicated for younger patients with massive cuff tears. However, LTT is relatively contraindicated in patients with cuff tear arthropathy; combined loss of elevation and external rotation; irreparable subscapularis tear; teres minor involvement; and/or those of advanced age or unable to comply with rigid rehabilitation guidelines.

An Expedited Sling Immobilization Protocol After Isolated Biceps Tenodesis Results in Clinical and Patient-Reported Postoperative Outcomes Equivalent to a Standard Rehabilitation Protocol.

Purpose: To characterize clinical and patient-reported outcomes for patients after isolated biceps tenodesis (BT) who underwent either standard or expedited sling immobilization protocols following surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared patients who were assigned to use a sling for either 4 to 6 weeks (standard) or 0 to 2 weeks (expedited) following an isolated BT. Primary endpoint included rate of re-rupture, surgical revision, loss of fixation, and Popeye deformity. Secondary endpoints included shoulder range of motion (ROM) as well as pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of pain and function. Missing data were managed via multiple imputation with chained equations. Complication prevalence 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Clopper Pearson method and a series of hierarchical mixed effects linear regressions were performed to assess differences between sling interventions in PROs and ROM. Results: The average age of the standard cohort (n = 66) was 49 years (±14 years), and the average age of the expedited cohort (n = 69) was 47 years (±14 years). The expedited and standardized cohorts demonstrated 0.4 and 0.3 complications per 10,000 exposure days, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (1.4 [95% confidence interval 0.2-10.0], P = .727). There was no demonstrated difference in forward flexion, abduction, or external ROM. The expedited group had less improvement in visual analog scale for pain scores that was not clinically significant and there were no differences in PROs of function. Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in the rate of re-rupture, surgical revision, loss of fixation, or Popeye deformity was noted between protocols after isolated BT. Furthermore, there were no clinically significant differences in ROM or PROs identified between protocols after isolated BT. This study suggests that patients who have undergone isolated BT may safely discontinue sling use within 2 weeks after surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Early Anterior Cruciate Ligament Treatment Might Be Crucial for Acute Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review of the Various Treatment Strategies.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of acute, combined, complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries in the literature. METHODS: A literature search using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Reviews was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies reporting outcomes of complete ACL-MCL injuries at a minimum of 12 months' follow-up. Data were presented as ranges. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies with 821 patients were included (mean age, 29 years; 61% male patients; mean follow-up period, 27 months). There were 4 randomized trials, 10 Level III studies, and 13 Level IV studies. Nine different strategies were noted, of which nonoperative MCL treatment with acute ACL reconstruction and acute MCL repair with acute ACL reconstruction were most commonly performed. Nonoperative MCL-ACL treatment and acute MCL repair with nonoperative ACL treatment led to low rates of valgus stability at 30° of flexion (27%-68% and 36%-77%, respectively) compared with acute ACL reconstruction with either nonoperative MCL treatment (80%-100%), acute MCL repair (65%-100%), or acute MCL reconstruction (81%-100%). Lysholm scores were not different between the strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in this systematic review suggest that ACL stabilization in the acute setting might result in the lowest rates of residual valgus laxity, whereas there is no clear difference between the different MCL treatments along with acute ACL reconstruction. Nonoperative MCL treatment with either nonoperative or delayed ACL reconstruction, as well as acute MCL repair with either nonoperative or delayed ACL reconstruction, leads to higher rates of valgus laxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Editorial Commentary: Postoperative Zoledronic Acid Improves Tendon Healing but Does Not Affect Outcomes in Rotator Cuff Repair Patients With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Understanding the preoperative risk factors for successful rotator cuff repair (RCR) and ways to optimize these factors is an evolving area of study. The Rotator Cuff Healing Index and other proxy risk factors for failed rotator cuff healing have implicated significant fatty infiltration, muscular atrophy, advanced chronological age, tear size and retraction, and ultimately, osteoporosis. Although structural (or biological) augmentation and tendon transfer have been proposed as solutions for the alarmingly high rate of failure after primary RCR, other options may preferentially focus on the enthesis and underlying osseous footprint. Currently, bisphosphonates are frequently used in the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fragility fractures. However, burgeoning evidence suggests that postoperative zoledronic acid may have clinical utility after rotator cuff and other tendon repairs. In the cost-conscious world of evidence-based medicine, the added economic burden of additional medications and office visits may or may not improve patient outcomes-much less confer added value. Our advice to fellow shoulder surgeons: Wait for further information, but continue to holistically consider and optimize risk factors for poor soft-tissue healing. Although the addition of postoperative bisphosphonates may improve suture anchor fixation and promote a better foundation for healing, it will not immediately transform your RCR success rates.

Editorial Commentary: At Least 2 out of 3 Adolescent Athletes Can Return to Preinjury Sports After Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow.

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum is a common cause of elbow pain in young throwers and gymnasts, symptoms of which can rob these young athletes of valuable time participating in sporting activities. The optimal treatment of adolescent capitellar OCD lesions is dependent on a variety of patient- and lesion-specific factors, including, but not limited to, lesion size, lesion location, physeal status, and lesion chronicity. Promisingly, marrow stimulation with or without debridement appears to confer high return-to-sport rates coupled with a low complication rate for young athletes suffering from this condition. Furthermore, these outcomes appear to remain consistent across the spectrum of OCD lesions typically encountered. There is concern, however, with the inconsistent reporting of patient- and lesion-specific factors across the literature, which greatly interferes with our ability to synthesize knowledge from multiple published studies and may lead surgeons astray when deciding on the optimal treatment for their patients. It is clear that no two OCD lesions are the same, and each patient requires a thorough history and physical exam, a complete radiographic workup, and a surgeon comfortable with a variety of surgical interventions if outcomes are to be maximized.

Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Is Effective for Adolescents With Meniscal Insufficiency, Although Outcomes May Decline Over Time.

Over the last several years, there has been a shift from arthroscopic partial meniscectomy to meniscal repair, especially in the younger patient. In case of a necessary partial meniscectomy, some patients have unremittent symptoms of pain and effusion corresponding to the postmeniscectomy syndrome. In these patients without large coronal malalignment, meniscal allograft transplantation is a valuable option to restore contact pressures, promote a chondroprotective microenvironment, and potentially delay secondary surgical interventions symptoms. In the adolescent population, meniscal allograft transplantation has been shown to effectively improve patient-reported outcomes with a low conversion to arthroplasty. However, these treatments are far from ideal, and prevention is certainly better than the cure: timely diagnosis of meniscus injuries, appropriate treatment with meniscus repair rather than partial meniscectomy, even in the complex tear patterns, and consideration of corrective osteotomy for milder cases of malalignment.

Significant Increase in Early Reoperation After Latarjet-Bristow Procedure Versus Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the 30-day outcomes, including length of stay, short-term complications, hospital readmission, all-cause reoperation, and death after arthroscopic Bankart (AB) and Latarjet. METHODS: Patients in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who had undergone either AB or Latarjet-Bristow (LB) procedures for anterior shoulder instability from 2012 to 2018 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Nearest neighbor propensity score matching was used to address any potential demographic differences. The 30-day incidence of postoperative complications were compared, and univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify risk factors associated with the incidence of post-operative complications. RESULTS: A total of 7,519 patients were identified, with 6,990 (93.0%) undergoing AB and 529 (7.0%) LB. After propensity score matching, the baseline demographics were not significantly different (P > .05). There was no significant difference in rate of total adverse events between the AB and LB cohorts (P = .06). There was a significant difference in the rate of return to the operating room between LB (1.9%) when compared to AB (0%) (P < .001). Of reoperations, 40% were due to need for revision stabilization (0.8% of all LB cases) and 40% were for irrigation and debridement. There was also a significant difference in operative time (AB = 87 minutes, LB = 131 minutes; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall 30-day complication rates were low for both groups, with similar rates among AB and LB patients. However, there was a statistically significant increased rate of short-term reoperation or revision stabilization in the LB cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Occupational and Functional Outcomes following Patellofemoral Arthroplasty in U.S. Military Servicemembers.

The functional outcomes in patients undergoing patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) with high occupational demands have not been fully examined. This study assessed return to work and conversion to TKA rates following PFA in a young, military cohort. Patient demographics, pain scores, and surgical information were retrospectively collected for all active-duty military members who underwent PFA over a 4-year period. The data were then analyzed to calculate return to work, conversion to TKA, and perioperative complications rates. A total of 48 servicemembers with 60 total PFAs (36 unilateral, 12 bilateral) were included, with a mean follow up of 2.2 years. At the final follow-up, 83% of servicemembers returned to military service or completed their service obligation after PFA. Conversion to TKA occurred in three (6.2%) patients at an average of 2.4 years after PFA, resulting in a PFA annual revision rate of 2.3%. The mean numeric rating scale for pain improved from 4.9 ± 2.6 at baseline to 2.5 ± 2.0 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Servicemembers with at least one prior ipsilateral knee procedure had a significantly decreased odds ratio (OR) for both occupational outcome failure (OR, 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-0.29) and overall failure (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.78). At an average of 2 years following PFA, 83% of military members returned to duty, with a low rate of revision to TKA. Prior ipsilateral knee procedure decreased the probability of medical separation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.