Frailty in an Adult Acute Hospital Population: Predictors, Prevalence, and Outcomes.

Frailty is common among older hospital inpatients. While studies describe frailty prevalence in acute hospitals, it is usually based upon retrospective hospital-coded data or brief screening on admission rather than comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Further, little is known about differences between pre-admission and current frailty status. Given this, we investigated the prevalence of pre-frailty and frailty among adult inpatients in a large university hospital after CGA. Of the 410 inpatients available, 398 were included in the study, with a median age of 70 years; 56% were male. The median length of stay (LOS) at review was 8 days. The point prevalence of frailty was 30% versus 14% for pre-frailty. The median Clinical Frailty Scale score pre-admission was 3/9, which was significantly lower than at review, which was 4/9 (p < 0.001). After adjusting for age and sex, frailty was associated with greater odds of prolonged LOS (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, p = 0.045), one-year mortality (OR 2.1, p = 0.006), and one-year institutionalisation (OR 9, p < 0.001) but not re-admission. Frailty was most prevalent on medical and orthopaedic wards. In conclusion, CGA is an important risk assessment for hospitalised patients. Frailty was highly prevalent and associated with poor healthcare outcomes. Frailty status appears to worsen significantly during admission, likely reflecting acute illness, and it may not reflect a patient's true frailty level. The development of frailty clinical care pathways is recommended in order to address the poor prognosis associated with a diagnosis of frailty in this setting.

Randomised controlled trials of antihypertensive therapy: does exclusion of orthostatic hypotension alter treatment effect? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Management of antihypertensive therapy is challenging in patients with symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, a population often excluded from randomised controlled trials of antihypertensive therapy. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to determine whether the association of antihypertensive therapy and adverse events (e.g. falls, syncope), differed among trials that included or excluded patients with orthostatic hypotension. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing blood pressure lowering medications to placebo, or different blood pressure targets on falls or syncope outcomes and cardiovascular events. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate a pooled treatment-effect overall in subgroups of trials that excluded patients with orthostatic hypotension and trials that did not exclude patients with orthostatic hypotension, and tested P for interaction. The primary outcome was fall events. RESULTS: 46 trials were included, of which 18 trials excluded orthostatic hypotension and 28 trials did not. The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in trials that excluded participants with orthostatic hypotension (1.3% versus 6.2%, P < 0.001) but not incidences of falls (4.8% versus 8.8%; P = 0.40) or syncope (1.5% versus 1.8%; P = 0.67). Antihypertensive therapy was not associated with an increased risk of falls in trials that excluded (OR 1.00, 95% CI; 0.89-1.13) or included (OR 1.02, 95% CI; 0.88-1.18) participants with orthostatic hypotension (P for interaction = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The exclusion of patients with orthostatic hypotension does not appear to affect the relative risk estimates for falls and syncope in antihypertensive trials.

Increased Salt Intake for Orthostatic Intolerance Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend increased salt intake as a first-line recommendation in the management of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension and recurrent syncope. There have been no systematic reviews of this intervention. We sought to summarize the evidence for increased salt intake in patients with orthostatic intolerance syndromes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Interventional studies that increased salt intake in individuals with orthostatic intolerance syndromes were included. Primary outcome measures included incidence of falls and injuries, and rates of syncope and presyncope. Secondary outcome measures included other orthostatic intolerance symptoms, blood pressure, and heart rate. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were eligible, including participants with orthostatic hypotension, syncope, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, and idiopathic orthostatic tachycardia (n = 391). Mean age was 35.6 (± 15) years. All studies were small and short-term (<60 mins-90 days). No study reported on the effect of increased salt intake on falls or injuries. Meta-analysis demonstrated that during head-up tilt, mean time to presyncope with salt intake increased by 1.57 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.88), mean systolic blood pressure increased by 12.27 mm Hg (95% CI, 10.86-13.68), and mean heart rate decreased by -3.97 beats per minute (95% CI, -4.08 to -3.86), compared with control. Increased salt increased supine blood pressure by 1.03 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.25). Increased salt intake resulted in an improvement or resolution of symptoms in 62.3% (95% CI, 51.6 to 72.6) of participants in short-term follow-up studies (mean follow-up of 44.3 days, 6 studies; n=91). Methodological quality of studies were low with high statistical heterogeneity in all meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis provides low-quality evidence of a short-term improvement in orthostatic intolerance with increased salt intake. There were no clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of increased salt intake on long-term clinical outcomes. Overall, there is a paucity of clinical trial evidence to support a cornerstone recommendation in the management of orthostatic intolerance syndromes.