Randomized Study Comparing the Effect of Carbon Dioxide Insufflation on Veins Using 2 Types of Endoscopic and Open Vein Harvesting.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess whether the use of carbon dioxide insufflation has any impact on integrity of long saphenous vein comparing 2 types of endoscopic vein harvesting and traditional open vein harvesting. METHODS: A total of 301 patients were prospectively randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 control arm of open vein harvesting (n = 101), group 2 closed tunnel (carbon dioxide) endoscopic vein harvesting (n = 100) and Group 3 open tunnel (carbon dioxide) endoscopic vein harvesting (open tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting) (n = 100). Each group was assessed to determine the systemic level of partial arterial carbon dioxide, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and pH. Three blood samples were obtained at baseline, 10 minutes after start of endoscopic vein harvesting, and 10 minutes after the vein was retrieved. Vein samples were taken immediately after vein harvesting without further surgical handling to measure the histological level of endothelial damage. A modified validated endothelial scoring system was used to compare the extent of endothelial stretching and detachment. RESULTS: The level of end-tidal carbon dioxide was maintained in the open tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting and open vein harvesting groups but increased significantly in the closed tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting group (P = 0.451, P = 0.385, and P < 0.001). Interestingly, partial arterial carbon dioxide also did not differ over time in the open tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting group (P = 0.241), whereas partial arterial carbon dioxide reduced significantly over time in the open vein harvesting group (P = 0.001). A profound increase in partial arterial carbon dioxide was observed in the closed tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting group (P < 0.001). Consistent with these patterns, only the closed tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting group demonstrated a sudden drop in pH over time (P < 0.001), whereas pH remained stable for both open tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting and open vein harvesting groups (P = 0.105 and P = 0.869, respectively). Endothelial integrity was better preserved in the open vein harvesting group compared with open tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting or closed tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting groups (P = 0.012) and was not affected by changes in carbon dioxide or low pH. Significantly greater stretching of the endothelium was observed in the open tunnel endoscopic open tunnel endoscopic vein harvesting group compared with the other groups (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the different vein harvesting techniques impact on endothelial integrity; however, this does not seem to be related to the increase in systemic absorption of carbon dioxide or to the pressurized endoscopic tunnel. The open tunnel endoscopic harvesting technique vein had more endothelial stretching compared with the closed tunnel endoscopic technique; this may be due to manual dissection of the vein. Further research is required to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of these vein grafts.

A randomized study comparing traditional monofilament knotted sutures with barbed knotless sutures for donor leg wound closure in coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical knots on the suture line provide an anchoring function, but also represent a potential source of infection and irritation on the donor leg after coronary artery bypass surgery. Knotless barbed sutures were designed to prevent knot-related complications. This study compared knot-related wound complication rates between patients receiving traditional monofilament sutures and those receiving barbed knotless sutures for closure of the donor leg. METHODS: One hundred and forty-two patients were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 70) received traditional monofilament sutures and Group 2 (n = 72) received barbed knotless sutures. All wounds were assessed on postoperative days 3 and 5 and weeks 2, 4 and 6 using a validated wound scoring system. Antibiotics usage and general practitioner and district nurse visits were recorded. RESULTS: No demographic differences were observed between groups. Leg wound skin closure times were significantly shorter in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (P < 0.001). Group 1 demonstrated a greater incidence of excessive scarring (P < 0.001), itching (P < 0.001), irritation (P < 0.001) and adverse skin tissue reactions (P < 0.001) than Group 2. Fewer general practitioner visits were recorded in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (P = 0.051). CONCLUSION: Knotless barbed suture usage significantly reduces the incidence of knot-related leg wound complications compared with traditional monofilament knotted sutures. This may be related to differences in the rate of absorption of the suture material or an associated decrease in the incidence of adverse skin tissue reactions that may delay postoperative wound healing.

Does the introduction of a comprehensive structured training programme for endoscopic vein harvesting improve conduit quality? A multicentre pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic vein harvesting is one of the most popular minimally invasive vein-harvesting techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. It is associated with improved cosmetic outcome and fewer wound-related problems compared with the conventional open technique. However, its efficacy with regard to conduit damage and long-term patency has recently been questioned. Learning curve-associated trauma to the vein has a major impact on vein quality and the incidence of graft failure post-surgery. In an attempt to address this problem, we have devised and tested a learning tool termed Manchester Endoscopic Learning Tool (MELT). In this study, we compare vein quality following MELT training with standard recommended training. METHODS: Fourteen practitioners across seven UK centres were enrolled into the study. Practitioners were categorized into two groups receiving MELT or standard training. Data were collected prospectively from the first eight vein retrievals per operator following training. A total of n = 112 vein-harvesting procedures were included in the study. RESULTS: Veins harvested by MELT practitioners had fewer small avulsions (P <0.001), required fewer repairs (P <0.001) and experienced a lower incidence of bruising (P <0.001) than veins obtained by practitioners receiving standard training. The incidence of very short side branches requiring repair was also significantly reduced (P <0.001) in the MELT group compared with standard training. CONCLUSIONS: Our formalized training programme consistently minimizes vein trauma resulting in better-quality conduits when compared with the current standard training. Exposure of surgical practitioners to the structured curriculum during their endoscopic vein harvesting training will enhance their learning and lead to better-quality conduits. This is likely to impart clinical benefit post-surgery.

A pilot project of familial screening in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital cardiac abnormality, is often familial, and is associated with dilatation of the aortic root. The risk of dissection is significantly higher than that in the general population, occurring at a younger age than in patients with idiopathic aortic aneurysms. Current ACC/AHA guidelines recommend familial echocardiographic screening which, to the present authors' knowledge, is not performed routinely and uniformly. The aim of this pilot project was to explore the practicalities of running such a program. METHODS: An initial cohort of 47 patients who had undergone surgery for BAV disease and/or associated aneurysmal aortic dilatation were offered counseling and familial screening. Referred first-degree relatives (FDR) underwent aortic valve and root assessment by standard two-dimensional echocardiography. RESULTS: Twenty-four index patients (51%) referred a total of 75 FDR (approximately three per patient) who wished to undergo echocardiography, of whom 52 (70%) attended for review. The pick-up rate of newly detected BAV was 8% (four of 52 relatives). One of these asymptomatic individuals had a significant ascending aortic aneurysm, which required prompt surgery. In the families of the 24 index patients, there was a total of eight cases (14% prevalence) of aortic valve disease, either known or newly detected via screening. CONCLUSION: This pilot study confirmed the relatively high prevalence of BAV among FDR of patients who have undergone surgery for BAV-associated pathology. Patients should be made aware of the condition's pattern of inheritance, and familial screening should be actively pursued to reduce the potential morbidity and mortality associated with BAV and its related aortopathy. A number of important and practical considerations for setting-up a familial screening program are discussed.

A randomized study comparing three groups of vein harvesting methods for coronary artery bypass grafting: endoscopic harvest versus standard bridging and open techniques.

OBJECTIVES: The use of an open vein harvesting (OVH) technique for saphenous vein harvesting (SVH) is associated with wound complications and delayed patient mobilization. This has led to the development of minimally invasive vein harvesting (MIVH) techniques, such as standard bridging and endoscopic SVH (EVH). This randomized trial was established to assess immediate clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in our centre. METHODS: A total of 150 consecutive patients were prospectively randomized into three groups. Group 1 consisted of 50 patients who underwent OVH, Group 2 consisted of 50 patients who underwent a standard bridging technique (SBT) and Group 3 consisted of 50 patients who underwent EVH. Each group was assessed for the incidence of wound infection, postoperative pain and satisfaction and the number of vein repairs using previously validated scoring systems. RESULTS: The MIVH techniques reduced the pain at hospital (P < 0.001) and at 6 weeks (P < 0.001), and improved cosmesis (P < 0.001), compared with the OVH group. Patient satisfaction was greatest in the EVH group followed by the SBT and then the OVH group. The clinical markers of inflammation were reduced with an MIVHt. There were more vein repairs in the EVH compared with the OVH (P < 0.001) and the SBT (P = 0.04) groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that MIVH reduces wound morbidity. We believe that each technique has advantages and disadvantages, which should be considered during the selection of a harvesting procedure by both the patient and the surgeon.

Closed suction drainage improves clinical outcome in patients undergoing endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) is a widely accepted technique for coronary artery bypass grafting, with well-reported benefits. However, EVH is associated with severe hematoma formation at incision sites, resulting in postoperative pain. We hypothesized that the use of a leg wound drain at the incision site may reduce these comorbidities. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients were prospectively randomly allocated into two groups of 50: group 1 with leg wound drains, and group 2 without drains. Group 1 patients underwent EVH followed by closure with a size 10 high vacuum leg wound drain (20 kPa), whereas group 2 underwent EVH followed by closure without a leg wound drain. Patients were assessed for postoperative pain, wound infection, and satisfaction using validated scoring systems immediately after surgery. RESULTS: Pain at rest (p < 0.001) and with movement (p < 0.001), incidence of hematoma (p < 0.001), and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) were significantly improved in the drain group at days 1 to 7 and remained significant at week 6 after surgery. Interestingly, the use of antibiotics (6% versus 24%, p = 0.012) and the number of general practitioner visits (6% versus 26%, p = 0.012) were lower in the drain group compared with the no-drain group. However, there were no differences in the length of hospital stay between the two groups after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the use of a high vacuum leg drain after EVH for long saphenous vein is of clear therapeutic benefit in the early postoperative period. We also report that this technique may reduce antibiotic administration and general practitioner visits after patient discharge.

Factors which influence the cardiac surgeon's decision not to operate on patients referred for consideration of surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to document what proportion of patients referred for consideration of cardiac surgery are turned down, the reasons given for not operating and also to evaluate what happens to those patients who do not undergo surgery. METHODS: 382 elective patients referred for consideration of cardiac surgery to one of six consultant cardiac surgeons at Wythenshawe Hospital during a one year period from were included in the study. Data for those patients who underwent an operation were collected prospectively in a cardiac surgery database. The case notes of those patients who did not undergo an operation were reviewed to establish reasons given by surgeons for not operating. Patients were followed up to determine vital status at the end of the study period. RESULTS: 333 (87.2%) patients underwent an operation and 49 (12.8%) did not. 68% of patients turned down were thought to be too high-risk. 14% of patients did not fulfill symptomatic or prognostic criteria for surgery and in 8% of patients coronary artery surgery was thought ineffective due to poor distal vessels. 6% of patients declined an operation and 4% were thought to be more suitable for coronary angioplasty. Patients turned down for surgery had more renal dysfunction (p = 0.017), respiratory disease (p < 0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (p < 0.001), were more likely to have undergone prior heart surgery (p < 0.001) and to have poor left ventricular function (p = 0.003). Patients turned down for surgery had significantly higher EuroSCORE values compared to patients who underwent an operation: 5 versus 4 (p = 0.006). Freedom from death in the patients turned down for surgery at 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-months was 95.9%, 91.8%, 83.7% and 71.4% respectively, compared with 97.9%, 96.7%, 96.4% and 94.5% for the patients who underwent an operation (p < 0.001 [log-rank]). 14 of the 15 deaths that occurred in the turned down group occurred in the category considered too high-risk for surgery. CONCLUSION: 12.8% of patients referred for consideration of cardiac surgery did not undergo an operation. Two thirds of patients not accepted for surgery were thought too high risk. Those patients who did not undergo an operation had a significantly worse mortality.

An audit of anticoagulation practice among UK cardiothoracic consultant surgeons following valve replacement/repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: In 1998, the American College of Cardiology and The American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published guidelines for the postoperative anticoagulation of patients who have undergone heart valve replacement. The American College of Chest Physicians made similar recommendations in 2001. The present survey was conducted to review anticoagulation practice among UK consultant cardiac surgeons, and to assess compliance with these guidelines. METHODS: An anonymous postal questionnaire was distributed to 185 adult cardiac surgeons identified from the Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (SCTS). RESULTS: The analysis was based upon 97 replies. All consultants use lifelong warfarin after mechanical valve replacement. In general, target INR ranges were lower for aortic valves compared with mitral valves. Some 53% (51/97) of consultants never use warfarin after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR), compared with 33% (28/86) after bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (MVR). Temporary (< or = 3 months) warfarin is used by 47% (46/97) of consultants after bioprosthetic AVR and by 63% (54/86) after bioprosthetic MVR. Some 64% (52/81) of consultants use warfarin after mitral valve repair, when an annuloplasty ring is inserted. This was always temporary (< or = 6 months). Aspirin is used long term by 54% (44/82) of consultants after mitral valve repair. CONCLUSION: All consultant cardiac surgeons adequately anticoagulate their patients after mechanical valve replacement. Only 16% (16/97) of cardiac surgeons follow current guidelines for the postoperative anticoagulation of bioprosthetic AVR. Only 28% (24/86) of consultant cardiac surgeons comply with guidelines for bioprosthetic MVR. No guidelines exist for the anticoagulation of patients after mitral valve repair. Guidelines need to be reviewed for the anticoagulation of patients undergoing bioprosthetic valve replacement and formulated for patients undergoing mitral valve repair.

Innovative use of Octopus IV stabilizer in cardiac trauma.

We report an innovative use of the Octopus IV cardiac stabilizer in a case of penetrating thoracic injury. In this case, we used the Octopus IV cardiac stabilizer to immobilize the right ventricular outflow tract during the repair of a stab wound. To date, there have been no reports of such an application of the Octopus IV cardiac stabilizer.