Identifying Strategies for Improving Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence: Perspectives from a Sample of Highly Adherent Young Men Who have Sex with Men.

Most research on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence and persistence uses a deficit-based approach to identify negative influences on PrEP adherence; however, an alternative set of approaches (such as resilience, asset-based, and positive variation) may identify equally important positive influences on PrEP adherence. Thus, the current study presents qualitative perspectives of PrEP adherence strategies from a sample of adherent YMSM. PrEP-using YMSM living in the Chicago area from a larger cohort study were recruited into a 90-day diary study that measured sexual health behaviors including PrEP use. A subset (n = 28) were then recruited for in-depth interviews between April and September 2020 covering topics of PrEP use and adherence. Thematic analysis was used to interpret patterns within the data. The analytic sample (n = 19) consistently reported high levels of adherence. Adherence strategies were organized into three broader categories: psychological (e.g. mindfulness, pill auditing), technical/instrumental (e.g. automated reminders, pill organizers), and social strategies (e.g. checking in with friends, or getting suggestions from friends). The majority of participants described using multiple strategies and changing strategies to respond to barriers to adherence. Other themes that were related to adherence included having a daily medication history and a generally positive outlook toward the PrEP regimen. Those who had medication histories were able to draw from experience to develop strategies for PrEP adherence. Findings suggest the need for pre-emptive counseling for PrEP-initiators on the use of multiple strategies, how to prepare for PrEP adherence, to adapt to challenges, and to adopt a range of potential strategies for adherence.

RESUMEN: La mayoría de las investigaciones sobre el cumplimiento y la persistencia de la profilaxis pre-exposición (PrEP) utiliza un enfoque basado en el déficit para identificar las influencias negativas en el cumplimiento de la PrEP; sin embargo, un conjunto alternativo de enfoques (como resiliencia, basado en en las capacidades o recursos, y variación positiva) puede identificar influencias positivas igualmente importantes en la adherencia a la PrEP. Por lo tanto, el estudio actual presenta perspectivas cualitativas de las estrategias de adherencia a la PrEP de una muestra de los hombres jóvenes que tienen sexo con hombres (YMSM) adherentes. Los YMSM que usaban PrEP que vivían en la región de Chicago de un estudio de cohorte más grande fueron reclutados en un estudio diario de 90 días que midió los comportamientos de salud sexual, incluido el uso de PrEP. Luego se reclutó un subconjunto (n = 28) para entrevistas en profundidad entre abril y septiembre de 2020 que cubrieron temas de uso y adherencia a la PrEP. El análisis temático se utilizó para interpretar patrones dentro de los datos. La muestra analítica (n = 19) reportó consistentemente altos niveles de adherencia. Las estrategias de adherencia se organizaron en tres categorías más amplias: psicológicas (p. ej., atención plena, auditoría de píldoras), técnicas/instrumentales (p. ej., recordatorios automáticos, organizadores de píldoras) y estrategias sociales (p. ej., ponerse en contacto con amigos o recibir sugerencias de amigos). La mayoría de los participantes describieron el uso de múltiples estrategias y el cambio de estrategias para responder a las barreras a la adherencia. Otros temas relacionados con la adherencia incluyeron tener un historial de medicación diario y una perspectiva generalmente positiva hacia el régimen de PrEP. Aquellos que tenían antecedentes de medicación pudieron aprovechar la experiencia para desarrollar estrategias para la adherencia a la PrEP. Los hallazgos sugieren la necesidad de asesoramiento preventivo para los iniciadores de la PrEP sobre el uso de múltiples estrategias, cómo prepararse para la adherencia a la PrEP, cómo adaptarse a los desafíos y adoptar una variedad de posibles estrategias para la adherencia.

'Dying from' to 'living with': framing institutions and the coping processes of African American women living with HIV/AIDS.

How do HIV-positive individuals transition from believing and behaving as though they have a 'death sentence' to interpreting and coping with HIV as a chronic but manageable illness? Using interview data collected from 30 HIV-positive African American women beginning in 2005, we reveal how and why interactions with non-profit and government institutions help to explain variation between those who thrive and those who do not following an HIV diagnosis. We argue that 'framing institutions' shape the form and tenor of coping trajectories by offering initial information about one's HIV status, a conceptual framework for understanding what it means to have HIV, language to talk about one's condition, and resources to begin restructuring one's life in the wake of a diagnosis. Ultimately, we highlight how a diverse array of non-profit and government institutions not only play a critical part in helping women cope with HIV but also renegotiate their self-conceptions as black women in the wake of receiving another stigmatizing social marker. In short, organizational ties shape women's movement from beliefs and behaviors that suggest that they are 'dying from' this disease to attitudes and actions consistent with the notion that they can 'live with' HIV.