Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 155(1): 3-13, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21255900

RESUMO

Hysteroscopy, hysterosalpingography (HSG), sonohysterography and endometrial ablation are increasingly performed in an outpatient setting. The primary reason for failure to complete these procedures is pain. The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of different types of pharmacological intervention for pain relief in office gynaecological procedures. A systematic search of medical databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central register of controlled trials, PsychInfo and CINHAL was conducted in 2009. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of local anaesthetics, opioid analgesics, non-opioid analgesics and intravenous sedation for pain relief during and after hysteroscopy, HSG, sonohysterography and endometrial ablation were reviewed. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects and failure to complete procedures. Where RCTs were not identified, the best available evidence was sought. Each study was assessed against inclusion criterion. Results for each study were expressed as a standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals and combined for meta-analysis with Revman 5 software. Meta-analysis revealed beneficial effect of the use of local anaesthetics during and within 30 min after hysteroscopy; SMD -0.45 (95% CI -0.73, -0.17) and SMD -0.51 (95% CI -0.81, -0.21) respectively. No beneficial effect was noted during HSG. One RCT found evidence of benefit for pain relief during hysterosalpingo-contrastsonography; SMD -1.04 [95% CI -1.44, -0.63]. There was no significant difference in failure to complete hysteroscopy due to cervical stenosis between the intervention and control groups (OR 1.31 (95% CI 0.66, 2.59)), but the incidence of failure to complete the procedure due to pain was significantly less in the intervention group (OR 0.29 (0.12, 0.69)). There is evidence of benefit for the use of local anaesthetics for outpatient hysteroscopy and hysterosalpingo-contrastsonography. Local anaesthetics may be considered when performing hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women to reduce the failure rate.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Obstétrico e Ginecológico/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 154(1): 9-15, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20926175

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Outpatient hysteroscopy is increasingly being used as a cost-effective alternative to in-patient hysteroscopy under general anaesthesia. Like other outpatient gynaecological procedures, however, it has the potential to cause pain severe enough for the procedure to be abandoned. There are no national guidelines on pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy. METHODS: A postal survey of UK gynaecologists was carried out to evaluate current clinical practice regarding methods of pain relief used during office hysteroscopy. A total of 250 questionnaires were sent out and 115 responses received. RESULTS: Outpatient hysteroscopy was offered by 76.5% of respondents. Respondents reported a wide variation in the use of routine and rescue analgesia, and also in the nature of the analgesia used. One-quarter of those offering outpatient hysteroscopy used no form of analgesia. CONCLUSION: The results showed that whilst there is no consensus on the type of analgesia provided, rescue analgesia is commonly being used, particularly in the form of intracervical blocks.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Analgesia/métodos , Histeroscopia/métodos , Manejo da Dor , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia/efeitos adversos , Histeroscopia/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Medicação Pré-Anestésica , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
3.
Hum Fertil (Camb) ; 11(2): 119-21, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18569067

RESUMO

Hysterosalpingography is a part of the infertility workup and can be painful. We conducted a postal survey of Obstetric and Gynaecology departments in the UK to evaluate the current clinical practice regarding the methods used to provide pain relief during hysterosalpingography. A total of 166 questionnaires were sent and 104 responses were received. Hysterosalpingography was offered by 93.3% of respondents. Respondents reported a wide variation in clinical practice with regards to the timing and the nature of analgesia used. Interestingly, 38% of respondents did not use analgesia at all. This variation in clinical practice may reflect the sparsity of evidence contained within the literature.


Assuntos
Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Histerossalpingografia , Infertilidade Feminina/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Satisfação do Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...