Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Prescribing Antidepressant Medication to Latino Immigrant Patients: A Preliminary Study.

Latinos in the United States are less likely to take antidepressants than non-Latino whites, and more likely to prefer depression treatment in primary care. This preliminary study comprised focus groups (2) with primary care providers (12) serving uninsured immigrant Latinos regarding their experiences prescribing and counseling patients about antidepressants. Barriers and challenges included health literacy, language barriers, and illiteracy; perceived stigma; patients' concerns about addiction, polypharmacy, and adverse effects; time constraints of office visits; and difficulty discussing comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder. Messages providers try to share with patients included allowing time for medications to work, taking medications daily as prescribed, mechanisms of action, weighing risks versus benefits, and flexible options for treatment. Providers' recommendations for improving this process included better low-literacy, culturally appropriate written materials with pictures or videos discussing depression. More research is needed to understand patients' and providers' needs in optimizing counseling about antidepressants, particularly regarding underserved and at-risk US populations.

Treatment of depression and PTSD in primary care clinics serving uninsured low-income mostly Latina/o immigrants: A naturalistic prospective evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: Uninsured immigrants to the United States are psychologically vulnerable due to limited access to mental health services. Latina/o immigrants from Central and South America are further at risk due to high levels of trauma exposure, both in their country of origin and their adopted country. Effective behavioral interventions in primary care are needed to address this services gap for common trauma-related mental disorders, including depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A naturalistic prospective study compared depression and PTSD outcomes for uninsured primary care patients, mostly Latina/o immigrants, in clinics with distinct models for integrating behavioral health services. One clinic had a collaborative care program, that is, a multicomponent, system-level intervention with the goals of facilitating increased screening, improving diagnostic accuracy, increasing uptake of evidence-based treatment, and utilizing measurement-based treatment to target. The other had colocated services, with an on-site therapist. METHOD: One hundred thirty-eight patients with presumptive depression were interviewed at baseline. Follow-up data were collected 8 months later. Care received between the two assessments was ascertained by chart review. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in depression symptoms regardless of clinic. Factors associated with improved depression outcomes included absence of comorbid PTSD and lack of additional trauma exposures. Although there was overall improvement in PTSD, there was significantly more improvement in the collaborative care clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that both models were effective for depression and PTSD; however, the collaborative care model had added benefits for those patients with PTSD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Knowledge and Preferences Regarding Antidepressant Medication Among Depressed Latino Patients in Primary Care.

US Latinos are less likely to utilize mental health services than non-Latino whites and to take antidepressant medications. This mixed-method study followed a subset (N = 28) of a research sample of depressed Latino immigrant primary care patients, who took depression medication, with a telephone interview to study their knowledge about and experiences with antidepressant medications. Most (82%) reported taking medication for 2 months or more, and 75% reported feeling better, whereas more than half reported side effects. Most (61%) agreed that antidepressants are generally safe and helpful in treating depression (68%); however, many believed they could be addictive (39%). Fifty percent of patients who discontinued their medication did not inform their providers. Twelve of the 28 patients also participated in focus groups about interactions with providers and made suggestions for conveying information about antidepressants. Patients suggested videos as a format to disseminate medication information because they do not require written comprehension. Other patient recommendations are presented.

Assessing health literacy and oral health: preliminary results of a multi-site investigation.

OBJECTIVES: To introduce a multi-site assessment of oral health literacy and to describe preliminary analyses of the relationships between health literacy and selected oral health outcomes within the context of a comprehensive conceptual model. METHODS: Data for this analysis came from the Multi-Site Oral Health Literacy Research Study (MOHLRS), a federally funded investigation of health literacy and oral health. MOHLRS consisted of a broad survey, including several health literacy assessments, and measures of attitudes, knowledge, and other factors. The survey was administered to 922 initial care-seeking adult patients presenting to university-based dental clinics in California and Maryland. For this descriptive analysis, confidence filling out forms, word recognition, and reading comprehension comprised the health literacy assessments. Dental visits, oral health functioning, and dental self-efficacy were the outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, up to 21% of participants reported having difficulties with practical health literacy tasks. After controlling for sociodemographic confounders, no health literacy assessment was associated with dental visits or dental caries self-efficacy. However, confidence filling out forms and word recognition were each associated with oral health functioning and periodontal disease self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that dental school patients exhibit a range of health literacy abilities. It also revealed that the relationship between health literacy and oral health is not straightforward, depending on patient characteristics and the unique circumstances of the encounter. We anticipate future analyses of MOHLRS data will answer questions about the role that health literacy and various mediating factors play in explaining oral health disparities.

A collaborative mental health research agenda in a community of poor and underserved Latinos.

The goal of this project was to engage community members and grassroots organizations in a discussion regarding perceived mental health needs and priorities of the population of underserved Latinos in Montgomery County, Maryland. Community-based participatory research was used to establish structures for participation and to design studies that effectively address local mental health needs. Four focus groups with 30 Latino lay health promoters and 20 key informant interviews were conducted to ascertain communal mental health needs and priorities. The main issues that emerged included mental health stigma, consequences of immigration-related stress, violence and alcoholism, and concerns about psychotropic medications. Ideas to address these issues and foster wellness through research were generated during a community-based workshop that included consumers, primary care and mental health clinicians, researchers, and representatives of local organizations and federal agencies. The product of this process was an implementable mental health research agenda, which is presented and discussed.

Latino oral health: A research agenda toward eliminating oral health disparities.

BACKGROUND: The Hispanic population has become the largest minority group in the United States, resulting in an increase in oral health care demands. Developing a research agenda and promoting collaboration on Latino oral health issues are crucial. METHODS: The Hispanic Dental Association and the University of Puerto Rico, School of Dentistry, San Juan, convened a workshop of health care providers and other experts to examine the current state of Hispanic oral health research and identify gaps in existing data and research methods. Participants were asked to break out into small groups to discuss research priorities. RESULTS: The participants discussed the following research areas: population-based studies, social and behavioral sciences, health promotion and communications, gene-environment interactions, and research training and workforce development. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding variations among subgroups within the Hispanic population in the development of future studies. CONCLUSIONS: Participants recommended collaborative research studies to advance existing oral disease prevention and oral health promotion efforts, with a stronger focus on the development of a multidisciplinary pipeline of researchers participating in Latino oral health research to address the growing needs of this population. Practice Implications. Building an infrastructure for research training and workforce development would supply researchers with the necessary tools to develop new studies that could affect the overall oral health of the Latino population. The translation and dissemination of these research findings will benefit clinicians by leading to a better understanding of new trends and specific population needs, as well as appropriate targeted interventions.